This search includes all content on the Scottish Parliament website, except for Votes and Motions. All Official Reports (what has been said in Parliament) and Questions and Answers are available from 1999. You can refine your search by adding and removing filters.
That probably brings us to the second point under paragraph 25 of the paper, which asks whether the committee is "content with the level of detail contained in the Action Programme in relation to the timetabling of national developments".Does David McLetchie's comment help with that point?
There are comments from the Subordinate Legislation Committee on the Rural Development Contracts (Rural Priorities) (Scotland) Amendment Regulations 2009 (SSI 2009/1) and an extract of its report has been circulated to members as paper RAE/S3/09/4/4.
(S3O-5404) The Scottish Government's role in the development of the cultural programme is that of a full and active partner and the main sponsor of the games.
We felt it appropriate to come to Dumbarton because we have received several petitions in recent months that relate to the area. I hope that that development is positive for the petitioners.
I am sure that people with recent personal experience of having babies would testify to the fears— Fear of my son developing cranial abnormalities was one of my paranoias—I kept putting him on his tummy when he was awake.
I was particularly interested in the issues of subsidiarity, which we will all have to do a lot of work on in order to develop some form of relationship with Westminster.
Does the minister agree that those positive developments in the curriculum would be jeopardised if we were to inflict on our pupils Lord Goldsmith's divisive proposal—championed by Gordon Brown—for the swearing of an oath of allegiance?