This search includes all content on the Scottish Parliament website, except for Votes and Motions. All Official Reports (what has been said in Parliament) and Questions and Answers are available from 1999. You can refine your search by adding and removing filters.
We could die of paralysis by analysis: how many stages do we want? We agree that we need to make the system as efficient as possible to achieve the objectives of a democratically elected Government of whatever persuasion.
We have given members the information that has enabled them to support the general principles of the bill. It is heartening to hear so many good wishes from members—I am sure that they will be passed on to Lord Hamilton.
Infrastructure Investment Plan I welcome to the 11th meeting in 2005 of the Finance Committee the press and the public, although not many members of either are in attendance.
Another consideration is not meeting deadlines. The order contains many dates that people could miss. David Cullum has worked on the issue and we should reflect that in the report.
If we can get evidence of the difference that can be made for people, surely service providers can, too. Even basic information about how many people are waiting for services would assist.
We put it in the bid category of underfunding from the most recent review period because there are many problems in roads maintenance. The issue is not about developing a new roads infrastructure, but about the maintenance of existing carriageways.
Adopting such an objective for cross-party groups would make things clearer for many people who work in them.Other possible solutions would include defining the term "parliamentary in character".
What we had heard, and the electronic responses that we had received, did not suggest unanimity on many issues. By talking, we have discovered more common ground, at least on the approach to the next phase.