There are 122,389 results relating to "Followed 2020 auf anurag"
Order by
|
Official Report
Meeting date:
1 November 2005
Edinburgh Tram (Line One) Bill Committee and Edinburgh Tram (Line Two) Bill Committee (Joint Meeting), 01 Nov 2005
There are no other questions from committee members. Do you have any follow-up questions, Mr Thomson? I have only one.
Official Report
Meeting date:
9 March 2005
Justice 1 Committee, 09 Mar 2005
Most ordinary citizens will not even know that the law has changed until they are affected by it.Let me give as an example a Scottish national who lived abroad—in France, say—but who moved back to Scotland following a separation or a divorce. Their partner, who lived in France, would apply to the French court for a decision to be made about their children.
Official Report
Meeting date:
21 December 2004
Procedures Committee, 21 Dec 2004
At a previous meeting, we agreed that following our review of the procedure for private bills our next major inquiry would relate to Sewel motions.
Official Report
Meeting date:
10 November 2004
Environment and Rural Development Committee, 10 Nov 2004
Having agreed that Ross Finnie should come before the committee in December to talk to us about the Executive response, it would be good to follow on from that with a session on a practical topic that we can all get our heads round.
Official Report
Meeting date:
28 September 2004
Subordinate Legislation Committee, 28 Sep 2004
The issue is serious, however; it is suggested that we follow the matter up with the Executive.
Official Report
Meeting date:
21 January 2003
Subordinate Legislation Committee, 21 Jan 2003
We could ask why there is no reference to article 9 of EC regulation 178/2002. The practice seems to be followed in English legislation but we in Scotland do not follow it because, in the past, the Executive has taken the view that the style should mirror our domestic legislation.
Official Report
Meeting date:
4 December 2002
Standards Committee, 04 Dec 2002
It is difficult for us to decide what course of action the new Standards Committee should follow—it might well not make a review of cross-party groups its number 1 priority.
Official Report
Meeting date:
24 September 2002
Subordinate Legislation Committee, 24 Sep 2002
Although section 53(4)(b) refers to the procedure to be followed in relation to applications for removal, it does not provide that those applications need to be made by the body itself.
Official Report
Meeting date:
11 September 2002
Standards Committee, 11 Sep 2002
He took that back to Hungary and following that, much to my surprise, I was asked to speak at the conference in Budapest.I contacted Sam Jones and suggested that speaking at the conference might be good for the Parliament.
Official Report
Meeting date:
28 June 2000
Standards Committee, 28 Jun 2000
Are we saying that this is the code that members should follow and that will be invoked by the Standards Committee?
