This search includes all content on the Scottish Parliament website, except for Votes and Motions. All Official Reports (what has been said in Parliament) and Questions and Answers are available from 1999. You can refine your search by adding and removing filters.
Then, as a result of amendment 149, OSCR would have to consider whether non-compliance by a charity or charity trustee was misconduct. Following from amendments 5 or 159, it would have to judge whether mismanagement was minor.
So you think that the City of Edinburgh Council will be able to continue with that scheme. Absolutely. I will follow up on a point to which you might have referred in your answer to Karen Whitefield's question.
As Sandy Boyle said, people talk about issues such as the South African asbestos case. Why, therefore, do we need to follow the line that has been proposed?
As Sandy Boyle said, people talk about issues such as the South African asbestos case. Why, therefore, do we need to follow the line that has been proposed?
On whether it would have been a good idea to have followed DEFRA in putting a time limit on prosecutions, my feeling and my understanding is that the standard position—if there is such a thing—for such offences is that there is no time limit.
The Transport and the Environment Committee is required to report on the instrument by 1 October 2001.We will follow our standard procedure for handling affirmative Scottish statutory instruments.
I presume that you do so if you feel that your recommendations have not been followed. Can you give examples of circumstances in which you would do so?