Skip to main content

Parliament dissolved ahead of election

The Scottish Parliament is now dissolved ahead of the election on Thursday 7 May 2026.

During dissolution, there are no MSPs and no parliamentary business can take place.

For more information, please visit Election 2026

Loading…

Search

There are 102,876 results relating to "Mais barato L"

Order by |

Refine your search

Select from the available filters to refine your search


Available filters:

Can't find what you're looking for?

If you're having trouble finding the information you want, please contact [email protected].

Official Report Meeting date: 29 June 2004

Subordinate Legislation Committee, 29 Jun 2004

Upon such a recommendation, the Parliamentary Bureau would have to lodge a motion to annul for consideration in the chamber, and there would not be time for all that to happen on the other side of recess. Any member may lodge a motion to annul within the 40-day period.
Official Report Meeting date: 16 June 2004

Environment and Rural Development Committee, 16 Jun 2004

As a consequence, it might have been more appropriate for this committee to consider the detail of how the code will be implemented.I had discussions with some of the representative organisations that were involved in preparing the code, and I share their general view that access to Scotland's countryside is important, and that we have a long tradition in this country of free access to the countryside, but that there are issues in the code that raise questions that have to be addressed.I will briefly go through some of the matters that have been brought to my attention, particularly issues such as the exercising of rights of access on tram lines within standing crop. That may...
Official Report Meeting date: 24 March 2004

Education Committee, 24 Mar 2004

Our priorities could no doubt be arranged differently, but I do not think that we are under particular pressure to produce something by the Easter recess, the summer recess, or whenever, that would prevent us from dealing with the proposed bill.If I may, I will move on to the list of suggested witnesses.
Official Report Meeting date: 25 November 2003

Standards Committee, 25 Nov 2003

We have the option to call witnesses later if we want to do so, and I am content to go along with that. Members may not have been aware that, as Kenneth Macintosh rightly said, the Standards Committee first took an interest because of the circumstances surrounding Margaret Jamieson's placement.
Official Report Meeting date: 28 October 2003

Audit Committee, 28 Oct 2003

On 6 November, we will publish a report that follows up on parts of the response, particularly in relation to what is happening in local authorities. If I may, I shall invite my colleague to say more about that.
Official Report Meeting date: 1 October 2003

Public Petitions Committee, 01 Oct 2003

At that point, if we believe that a parliamentary committee should examine the issue, we could action petition PE616. May I— I am sorry, Fergus, but we are pushed for time.
Official Report Meeting date: 2 September 2003

Enterprise and Culture Committee, 02 Sep 2003

The National Library of Scotland would not then be able to receive publications that would be useful to it. Bob Irvine may wish to comment on the delay since 2002.
Official Report Meeting date: 24 June 2003

European and External Relations Committee, 24 Jun 2003

It should belong to the Finance Committee—I do not know what its work programme is like, but surely that issue should form a major aspect of its work.I see that consideration of the euro has been marked down for May and June of next year. We therefore have time for that and we do not have to start a load of work on it at this particular stage.Like Gordon Ja...
Official Report Meeting date: 10 June 2003

Equal Opportunities Committee, 10 Jun 2003

We will have to consider the legislation that is coming through and how it will affect us. We may want to catch up with the Minister for Communities to ask what is happening with mainstreaming.
Official Report Meeting date: 25 March 2003

Public Petitions Committee, 25 Mar 2003

In his previous response to the Public Petitions Committee, the Lord Advocate acknowledged that the petitioners may disagree with that view, but made it clear that "the Opinion is set out comprehensively and is binding".

Can't find what you're looking for?

If you're having trouble finding the information you want, please contact [email protected].