This search includes all content on the Scottish Parliament website, except for Votes and Motions. All Official Reports (what has been said in Parliament) and Questions and Answers are available from 1999. You can refine your search by adding and removing filters.
.—
we remain open to views on whether or not there would be benefit in retaining or removing this provision, and would welcome any further evidence on the impact of Section 72 to date to inform this. The consultation closes on 4 April 2017 and we will consider responses and any associated evidence in due course, prior to any final decision on whether or not...
My understanding is as you have described, convener. The first payment date has been an issue, but people have been working together and we think that we are now in a much better place.
Those people should be afforded the same protections as children, because the way in which they give evidence at a later date could be compromised if they are not.
I agree that we should use the most relevant, appropriate and up-to-date data, but if a housing officer in Fife goes into a house and sees dampness, that needs to be sorted.
Also, I am not entirely sure that those measures have been fully monitored and evaluated to establish how successful they have been to date. It may be that they have been found to be successful.
However, the arrangements that are currently in place in the UK for developing trade deals are already inadequate, out of date and in need of an urgent and radical overhaul.
I do not think that this is your specialist area, but can you comment on the feasibility of achieving that by the intended date of 2030—a little over 10 years from now?
We are talking about significant Scots law principles. I understand that at a future date the committee will hear from the legal fraternity in the form of the Faculty of Advocates and others.