This search includes all content on the Scottish Parliament website, except for Votes and Motions. All Official Reports (what has been said in Parliament) and Questions and Answers are available from 1999. You can refine your search by adding and removing filters.
Members have had a chance to read the paper, so I want to confirm whether or not they want to take the course of action that is outlined in the report. The report is not yet on the website, but it will be—I know that that is exciting for members.
We will not have reached our objectives if, within the near future, it is not possible for people to go via us or our website to find that kind of information.
I do not understand it.In your professional judgment, was the interactive website forum for the members' business debate on chronic pain on 27 February a successful example of the kind of discussion that can take place in the Parliament?
If our system is seen to be unfair, disillusionment sets in and democracy begins to die a little. I believe that we are already an uncomfortable distance down that road.
Not only that, but in the areas in which zero tolerance was, quite reasonably, being imposed, there was a transfer from overt, violent street crime to more subtle forms of crime, partly commercial and retail crime.
In a sense, the draft SPP 8 and the draft SPP 21 are two sides of the same coin. The draft SPP 8 suggests that the main emphasis of development should be the revival of town centres, so the two go hand in hand.
I would be surprised if anybody would disagree with the proposal, simply because it can happen—that is, the two people can toss a coin to decide which one is to be the applicant and which one is to be the respondent; one will sign page 1 and the other will sign page 2, and in effect that will be a joint application.
There was a misunderstanding about the number of properties involved and figure 26 referred to the number of blocks on the plan whereas each block represents four properties.