Skip to main content
Loading…

Search

There are 92,884 results relating to "7 buy fc coins Besuche die Website Buyfc26coins.com. gunston und schonel..aGuR"

Order by |

Refine your search

Select from the available filters to refine your search


Available filters:

Can't find what you're looking for?

If you're having trouble finding the information you want, please contact [email protected].

Official Report Meeting date: 14 March 2005

Waverley Railway (Scotland) Bill Committee, 14 Mar 2005

I guess that the reverse side of that coin is that we do not believe that a clear and comprehensive risk management strategy is in place at this stage.
Official Report Meeting date: 8 March 2001

Plenary, 08 Mar 2001

Without crofting, many such remote areas would die. It is therefore essential that crofting is not put under threat, but is instead given all possible help to ensure its long-term future.
Questions and Answers Date answered: 11 October 2001

S1W-18562

To ask the Scottish Executive what guidance will be given to Highlands and Islands Enterprise on how the #36 million investment in tourism initiatives announced on 7 August 2001 should be spent. None.
Official Report Meeting date: 19 January 2005

Education Committee, 19 Jan 2005

I have one other point on paragraph 7, which is about focusing on efficiency and budget considerations.
Official Report Meeting date: 2 July 1999

Plenary, 02 Jul 1999

I move,That the Parliament agrees that on or after 2 July 1999 the register of interests of Members of the Parliament be printed in a loose-leaf folder to be kept at the Office of the Clerk of the Parliament and published on the Parliament's website.
Official Report Meeting date: 15 March 2007

Plenary, 15 Mar 2007

Motion moved, That the Parliament agrees that, during Stage 3 of the Custodial Sentences and Weapons (Scotland) Bill, debate on groups of amendments shall, subject to Rule 9.8.4A, be brought to a conclusion by the time limit indicated, that time limit being calculated from when the Stage begins and excluding any periods when other business is under consideration or when the meeting of the Parliament is suspended (other than a suspension following the first division in the Stage being called) or otherwise not in progress: Groups 1 to 4: 55 minutes Groups 5 to 6: 1 hour 35 minutes Groups 7...
Official Report Meeting date: 25 January 2007

Plenary, 25 Jan 2007

Bill, debate on groups of amendments shall, subject to Rule 9.8.4A, be brought to a conclusion by the time limit indicated, that time limit being calculated from when the Stage begins and excluding any periods when other business is under consideration or when the meeting of the Parliament is suspended (other than a suspension following the first division in the Stage being called) or otherwise not in progress: Groups 1 to 5: 55 minutes Groups 6 and 7...
Official Report Meeting date: 2 November 2006

Plenary, 02 Nov 2006

Motion moved, That the Parliament agrees that, during Stage 3 of the Scottish Commissioner for Human Rights Bill, debate on groups of amendments shall, subject to Rule 9.8.4A, be brought to a conclusion by the time limit indicated, that time limit being calculated from when the Stage begins and excluding any periods when other business is under consideration or when the meeting of the Parliament is suspended (other than a suspension following the first division in the Stage being called) or otherwise not in progress: Group 1: 50 minutes Group 2: 1 hour 20 minutes Groups 3 to 5: 1 hour 45 minutes Groups 6 and 7...
Official Report Meeting date: 20 June 2006

Subordinate Legislation Committee, 20 Jun 2006

Okay—a failure to follow proper legislative practice and defective drafting.Our points 3 to 7 were also on defective drafting. In our eighth point, we suggested that the meaning could have been clearer and we highlighted more defective drafting.
Official Report Meeting date: 25 April 2006

Subordinate Legislation Committee, 25 Apr 2006

The Executive's response is included with our papers and members have been given an updated copy.The suggestion is that we draw the attention of the Parliament to the order on the following grounds: further information was required from and supplied by the Executive on points 1 and 2; defective drafting was acknowledged by the Executive in points 3, 5, 6 and 7; and points 4 and 8 indicate that meaning could have been clearer.

Can't find what you're looking for?

If you're having trouble finding the information you want, please contact [email protected].