This search includes all content on the Scottish Parliament website, except for Votes and Motions. All Official Reports (what has been said in Parliament) and Questions and Answers are available from 1999. You can refine your search by adding and removing filters.
Investment in those capacity projects alone will provide an increase of at least 140 beds by 2025-26, boosting the rehab capacity in Scotland from 425 to 565, which is an increase of more than 30 per cent.
Alison Harris: To ask the Scottish Government what its position is on the reported views of businesses regarding slow broadband speeds in the Grangemouth area. (S5O-00176) 7. Tom Arthur: To ask the Scottish Government what action it is taking to empower communities.
Colin Smyth: To ask the Scottish Government what plans it has to review the criteria used to assess potentially vulnerable areas. (S5O-00863) 7. Kenneth Gibson: To ask the Scottish Government what the environmental impact will be in Scotland of reductions to UK-wide feed-in tariffs.
Retrieved from <a href="https://www.ruralnetwork.scot/funding/leader" target="_blank">https://www.ruralnetwork.scot/funding/leader</a> [accessed 8 March 2019] Under the EU rules, this approach is known as community-led local development.2European Commission. (2014, March 26). Community-led Local Development.
Annexe B: Written evidence submitted to the Committee
Below is a list of all written evidence submitted to the Committee in relation to this petition:
PE1603/A: Dundee City Council Letter of 22 September 2016
PE1603/B: North Lanarkshire Council Letter of 26 September 2016
PE1603/C: Angus Council Letter of 27 September 2016
PE1603/D: East Dunbartonshire Council Letter of 29 September 2016
PE1603/E: Glasgow City Council Letter 4 October 2016
PE1603/F: East Ayrshire Council Letter of 5 October 2016
PE1603/G: Argyll and Bute Council Letter of 6 October 2016
PE1603/H: Aberdeen City Council Letter of 7 September 2016
PE1603/I: AHDS Email of 7 September 2016
PE1603/J: Renfrewshire Council Letter of 10 October 2016
PE1603/K: East Renfrewshire Council Email of 11 October 2016
PE1603/L: South Lanarkshire Council of 11 October 2016
PE1603/M: Stirling Council Letter of 12 October 2016
PE1603/N: Children and Young People’s Commissioner Scotland Letter of 13 October 2016
PE1603/O: Scottish Government Letter of 14 October 2016
PE1603/P: Scottish Youth Parliament Letter of 21 October 2016
PE1603/Q: Minister of State for the Armed Forces Letter of 1 November 2016
PE1603/R: North Ayrshire Council Letter of 7 November 2016
PE1603/S: Petitioner Letter of 11 November 2016
PE1603/T: Young Scots for Independence Letter of 9 January 2017
PE1603/U: Minister of State for the Armed Forces Letter of 4 January 2017
PE1603/V: Together Scotland Letter of 11 January 2017
PE1603/W: Justice and Peace Commission of the Catholic Bishop's Conference of Scotland Letter of 12 January 2017
PE1603/X: Medact Letter of 12 January 2017
PE1603/Y: Women's International League for Peace and Freedom (Scottish Branch) Letter of 12 January 2017
PE1603/Z: Eileen Cook Email of 13 January 2017
PE1603/AA: SPTC Letter of 13 January 2017
PE1603/BB: Conor McAllister Letter of 16 January 2017
PE1603/CC: Skills Development Scotland Letter of 16 January 2017
PE1603/DD: Scientists for Global Responsibility (SGR) Letter of 17 January 2017
PE1603/EE: Petitioner Letter of 10 February 2017
PE1603/FF: Deputy First Minister and Cabinet Secretary for Education and Skills submission of 5 April 2017
PE1603/GG: Petitioners submission of 15 May 2017
PE1603/HH: Petitioners submission of January 2018
Yours sincerely, Kenneth Gibson MSP Convener 10 Letter from the Convener to the Permanent Secretary of 26 June 2024 (parliament.scot) 11 Letter from the Permanent Secretary to the Convener of 31 July 2024 (parliament.scot) 3
pdf.
application/pdf.
115340.
Assuming that these programmes are fully funded through capital, the capital budget required would peak between Financial Year 2022-23 to 2025-26 where it is estimated that an annual budget of £800-£900m will be required.
Such designation does not, however, require that the Committees consider the Bill. 7. Lack of a formal designation does not prevent any committee whose remit is engaged from considering the Bill if it so wishes. 8.