This search includes all content on the Scottish Parliament website, except for Votes and Motions. All Official Reports (what has been said in Parliament) and Questions and Answers are available from 1999. You can refine your search by adding and removing filters.
I thank the minister for her comments.Before I ask my final question, I must say that it is difficult to discern a difference in the minister's position today compared to before the quota negotiations began in December.
The Arbuthnott report is complicated, so will the minister publish tables that can be compared with the ones in the original short guide, page 17 of which talks about the changes in resources for each health board?
I was concerned when the minister compared the elections with the elections to school boards and community councils, which are not uniformly successful in Scotland.
Will the minister provide, if not now, before tomorrow's debate, detailed figures for those he alleges will be better off, in terms of student debt, compared with those whose debt will be the same, or just as bad?
That is a return of 6.9 per cent for the mandatory drugs test, compared with other establishments that have percentage returns in the 40s, 50s and 60s.
We can present our proposals by comparing them with the existing ones. If our proposals are approved, we can explain that we still have a wee bit to do on them, but that we will come back in due course.
The Executive must also ensure that decisions of that supreme court in non-Scottish cases are not binding in Scots law—except in so far as the law that determines such cases is applicable on a UK basis.