It seeks to provide clarification that section 26 of the Conveyancing and Feudal Reform (Scotland) Act 1970 will operate to remove from the title sheet any remaining prior ranking or pari passu securities following a sale of repossession, even if the calling-up procedure did not comply with the interpretation of the statutory requirements in the Supreme Court decision on RBS v Wilson.In Scots property law, the established position has always been that where a standard security is called up and the property is repossessed, then subsequently sold by the first security holder, subsequent or pari passu securities are treated as having been automatically discharged.However, the keeper’s current policy when processing applications for registration of a dealing that is affected by the decision in RBS v Wilson is not to remove from the relevant title sheet any additional securities on the property that rank as pari passu with, or postponed to, the security that has been called up, unless they have been formally discharged.It is also the keeper’s policy to expressly exclude indemnity in respect of loss arising from rectification to delete such securities, or from the subjects being found not have been disburdened of them under section 26 of the 1970 act.The consequence of that policy is that land and charge certificates that are issued to the purchasers in such circumstances indicate that the title is still subject to pari passu or postponed securities granted by the previous owner, and that such securities rank ahead of any new security that is granted by the purchaser, for example for a mortgage.