There are 66,049 results relating to "comprar moneya FC 26 ps5 Visité Buyfc26coins.com. Rápido, constabl y con buen precis. Ideal..slc2"
Order by
|
Official Report
Meeting date:
5 June 2018
Meeting of the Parliament 05 June 2018
I am aware that both Assistant Chief Constable Higgins and the chief superintendent for local policing in the Inverclyde area, Gordon Crossan, visited both the officers in hospital on Friday and have been in contact with them and their families on a regular basis.
Last updated:
8 January 2025
Safety guidance for visiting groups
Visiting the Scottish Parliament with groups: Safety guidance for visiting teaching staff, supervisors and group leaders. 1.
Official Report
Meeting date:
30 June 2022
Meeting of the Parliament (Hybrid) 30 June 2022
First, on the impact of the SPF action, that is, of course, an operational matter for the chief constable. I would have thought that Douglas Ross might know that the chief constable has advised—Interruption.
Questions and Answers
Date answered:
9 October 2025
S6W-40810
The Scottish Government welcome’s Police Scotland’s commitment to providing a safe environment for officers, staff and the public.Management of the Police Scotland estate, including assessing the impact of the condition of police buildings on staff morale, is an operational matter for the Chief Constable under the oversight of the Scottish Police Authority (SPA).It is for the SPA and the Chief Constable to allocate resources to meet their priorities and I expect they will be reflecting fully on any health and safety issues, and of course on the wellbeing of officers and staff.
Questions and Answers
Date answered:
30 July 2021
S6W-01460
The published figures are not broken down to show the reasons for issuing of fixed-penalty notices or arrests; the presentation and format of Police Scotland data, is an operational matter for the Chief Constable. S6W-01460
Official Report
Meeting date:
8 November 2023
Meeting of the Parliament 08 November 2023
At NFU Scotland’s autumn conference on 26 October, I committed to working with the farming sector to provide support for repair of flood banks that were damaged by the extreme rainfall during October to protect our vitally productive farm land.
Official Report
Meeting date:
31 October 2018
Local Government and Communities Committee 31 October 2018
For Lennon, Monica (Central Scotland) (Lab) Simpson, Graham (Central Scotland) (Con) Stewart, Alexander (Mid Scotland and Fife) (Con) Wightman, Andy (Lothian) (Green) Against Dornan, James (Glasgow Cathcart) (SNP) Ewing, Annabelle (Cowdenbeath) (SNP) Gibson, Kenneth (Cunninghame North) (SNP) The result of the...
Last updated:
17 March 2026
Submission from NHS Lanarkshire
Question 2 – Regulation 3 covers the right to visits in general. Does this regulation adequately describe what ‘facilitation’ of visiting does or does not entail?
Official Report
Meeting date:
17 May 2023
Criminal Justice Committee 17 May 2023
For Findlay, Russell (West Scotland) (Con) Greene, Jamie (West Scotland) (Con) Against Clark, Katy (West Scotland) (Lab) MacGregor, Fulton (Coatbridge and Chryston) (SNP) Mackay, Rona (Strathkelvin and Bearsden) (SNP) McNeill, Pauline (Glasgow) (Lab) Nicoll, Audrey (Aberdeen South and North Kincardine) (SNP) ...
Last updated:
24 March 2021
SPBill72BS052021
Dogs (Protection of Livestock) (Amendment) (Scotland) Bill [AS PASSED] An Act of the Scottish Parliament to increase penalties and provide additional powers to investigate and enforce the offence of livestock worrying, and for connected purposes. 1 Offence under section 1 of the 1953 Act: name, definition and penalty (1) The Dogs (Protection of Livestock) Act 1953 (“the 1953 Act”) is amended as follows. 5 (2) The title of section 1 becomes “Offence where dog attacks or worries livestock on agricultural land”. (3) In that section— (a) in subsection (1), after “a dog” insert “attacks or”, (b) in subsection (2), paragraph (a) is repealed, 10 (c) in paragraph (b) of subsection (2A)— (i) after “guide dog” insert “or other assistance dog”, (ii) after “hunt” insert “, but only if and to the extent that the dog is performing the role in question”, (d) in subsection (4)— 15 (i) before “worrying” insert “attacking or”, (ii) before “worried” insert “attacked or”, (e) in subsection (6), for paragraphs (a) and (b) substitute— “(a) to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 12 months; (b) to a fine not exceeding £40,000; or 20 (c) both.”. (4) In subsection (2) of section 2, before “worrying” insert “attacking or”. (5) The modification made by subsection (3)(e) applies only to offences committed on or after the date on which the modification comes into force. 2 Power to make order in respect of person convicted 25 (1) After section 1 of the 1953 Act, insert— SP Bill 72B Session 5 (2021) 2 Dogs (Protection of Livestock) (Amendment) (Scotland) Bill “1A Orders in respect of persons convicted of an offence under section 1 (1) Where a person (P) is convicted of an offence under section 1, the court may make an order— (a) disqualifying P from owning or keeping a dog during such period as the 5 court thinks fit, (b) requiring P, during such period as the court thinks fit, to prevent any dog of which P has charge from going on to land which P knows, or reasonably ought to know, is agricultural land on which livestock is present or is likely to be present, or 10 (c) both. (2) Where P is convicted of an offence under section 1, then for the purposes of any appeal under the Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995 (c.46) an order under subsection (1) is to be treated as a sentence. (3) If P fails to comply with an order under subsection (1), P commits an offence 15 and is liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding level 5 on the standard scale. (4) Subsection (5) applies where an order has been made under subsection (1) and at least one year has elapsed since the order was made. (5) P may, in such manner as may be prescribed by rules of court, apply to the 20 court which made the order for the order to be discharged in whole or in part, or otherwise varied. (6) If the application in respect of an order is refused, in whole or in part— (a) P may appeal to the Sheriff Appeal Court, and (b) no further application in respect of that order shall otherwise be 25 competent unless at least one year has elapsed from the date of the refusal.”. (2) The modification made by subsection (1) applies only to offences committed on or after the date on which the modification comes into force. 3 Power to seize etc. dog suspected of attacking or worrying livestock 30 (1) Section 2 (enforcement) of the 1953 Act is amended as follows. (2) In subsection (2)— (a) after “any land” insert “(other than premises)”, (c) for “that land, and the land” substitute “land that”. (3) After that subsection, insert— 35 “(2A) Where in the case of a dog found on any land (other than premises) a police officer has reasonable cause to believe that— (a) the dog has been attacking or worrying livestock on land (whether the land on which the dog is found or other land) that appears to him to be agricultural land, and 40 (b) it is necessary to seize the dog in order to identify and secure evidence of the commission of an offence under section 1 of this Act, 3 Dogs (Protection of Livestock) (Amendment) (Scotland) Bill then the police officer may seize the dog and may detain it for as long as necessary to identify and secure any such evidence.”. (4) In subsection (3)— (a) for “(10)” substitute “(9)”, 5 (b) for “under the last preceding subsection” substitute “by a police officer under subsection (2) of this section”, (c) at the end, add “, subject to subsection (6) of this section”. (5) After that subsection insert— “(4) Subsections (2) to (9) of section three of the Dogs Act, 1906 shall apply in 10 relation to dogs seized by a police officer under subsection (2A) of this section as they apply in relation to dogs seized under subsection (1) of that section, subject to— (a) disregarding the words “and paid all expenses incurred by reason of its detention” where they appear in subsection (4) of that section, and 15 (b) subsection (6) of this section. (6) The application of section three of the Dogs Act, 1906 to dogs seized under this section is subject to a presumption that, unless there are reasonable grounds to suspect that the dog is dangerous or it is otherwise impracticable to do so, the dog should be sold rather than destroyed.”. 20 4 Powers to authorise entry, search, seizure etc. (1) For section 2A of the 1953 Act, substitute— “2A Power to authorise entry, search, seizure etc. (1) Subsection (4) applies if, on an application made by a constable...
