This search includes all content on the Scottish Parliament website, except for Votes and Motions. All Official Reports (what has been said in Parliament) and Questions and Answers are available from 1999. You can refine your search by adding and removing filters.
In most cases that will be the owner, but it could be a tenant. Amendments 25 and 26 clarify that if the relevant person is not the owner, they are still responsible for all the repayable amount.
There needs to be a greater focus on that to ensure that we do not have continuous repeat visits to the same sites. I can give a short answer but, with respect, I note that it is a hugely important question about the entirety of future money.
The adviser would have to consider how much is too much travel for the client to visit their daughter. Neither the CFS nor the SFS gets advisers away from making that judgment.
When I was in a previous role elsewhere, a social worker was dealing with a middle-aged woman who had mental health issues and who, for a number of years, had constantly visited her GP to get antidepressants.
I have a question for Catherine Lloyd. I recently visited the Murton Trust in her patch, and one thing that came out of that visit is that, when youngsters are involved in activities there, they often come back and bring their mum and dad or aunt and uncle or whoever with them.
The purpose of the First Minister’s visit was to ensure that Scotland’s position, including our experience of the referendum and the result, was heard and understood in Europe.
(S5O-05012) Our rural tourism infrastructure fund is already supporting 45 projects and 26 design grants across Scotland, with investments in car parks, waste disposal facilities and toilet provision, for example.