This search includes all content on the Scottish Parliament website, except for Votes and Motions. All Official Reports (what has been said in Parliament) and Questions and Answers are available from 1999. You can refine your search by adding and removing filters.
It is still a matter of speculation whether we are talking about one to four cases, but I point out that those are the formal investigations, not the complaints.
Although the 2018 act says that SCOSS should be given the time that it needed, the reality was that, if there was a legislative timetable imperative for some regulations to be done by a certain point, that would happen whether we reported or not.
SP Bill 60–EN 1 Session 5 (2019) This document relates to the Forensic Medical Services (Victims of Sexual Offences) (Scotland) Bill (SP Bill 60) as introduced in the Scottish Parliament on 26 November 2019 The Bill: an overview 5.
I have a wee question about the Erik Østergaard email that was sent on 26 September. He made it quite clear that the contract should not have gone ahead.
Retrieved from <a href="https://archive2021.parliament.scot/S5_Delegated_Powers/20180911CabSec.pdf" target="_blank">https://archive2021.parliament.scot/S5_Delegated_Powers/20180911CabSec.pdf</a> [accessed 6 August 2021] On 26 June 2019, the Convenor of the Finance and Constitution Committee (FCC) wrote to the Cabinet Secretary for Government Business and Constitutional Relations, summarising the outcome of their cross-parliamentary consultation on the impact of Brexit on devolution and parliamentary scrutiny.2Scottish Parliament. (2019, June 26).
One of that committee’s recommendations—recommendation 26 in its report—was that perinatal mental health services should not be restricted to the one-year period after the birth of the child.