This search includes all content on the Scottish Parliament website, except for Votes and Motions. All Official Reports (what has been said in Parliament) and Questions and Answers are available from 1999. You can refine your search by adding and removing filters.
It is proposed that at next week's meeting, on 14 December, we take evidence from the Deputy Minister for Finance and Public Service Reform. I propose that at the meeting the minister should be given an opportunity to set out the content of the Sewel motion and the Executive's reasons for lodging it.
I understand that the Executive will introduce that directive soon as the water environment and water services bill. My understanding is that, on the bill's introduction, a lead committee will be identified and the bill will begin its parliamentary process.
I understand that the Executive will introduce that directive soon as the water environment and water services bill. My understanding is that, on the bill's introduction, a lead committee will be identified and the bill will begin its parliamentary process.
To put that in context, that figure is about 0.1 per cent of what the Scottish health service will spend this year. That is a significant but not absolutely unusual price tag.
I also thank Edna Paterson, the international officer for Glasgow City Council's education services, who has produced a paper on the European dimension in Scottish education, which I will send to committee members.
I also thank Edna Paterson, the international officer for Glasgow City Council's education services, who has produced a paper on the European dimension in Scottish education, which I will send to committee members.
My understanding in this area of dispute has always been that it was down to London Transport, which for some reason was viewed as a UK service, of benefit to people in Caithness as well as to people in Islington, which struck me as odd.
Amendments 16 and 20 change the parliamentary procedures that enable ministers to add to the purposes for which directed surveillance or covert human intelligence services may be authorised, from negative to draft affirmative procedure, as we discussed in the previous debate.