This search includes all content on the Scottish Parliament website, except for Votes and Motions. All Official Reports (what has been said in Parliament) and Questions and Answers are available from 1999. You can refine your search by adding and removing filters.
Act of Adjournal (Criminal Procedure Rules Amendment No 3) (Risk Assessment Orders and Orders for Lifelong Restriction) 2006 (SSI 2006/302) No points arise on the act of adjournal. Convener, I believe that we may have had our discussion about denturists in relation to the wrong instrument.
That augurs badly for the future, unless we can get a grip on things somewhere along the line. I recognise the serious point that Phil Gallie makes. It is important to consider details, although we may not agree on outcomes.
Does the Executive having failed to respond to our points within the time available mean that we have lost a week, or will we get an extra week to consider the Executive's response?
The clerks have also circulated some issues that were raised during the debate on the legislative process on 15 March. We will consider mainly the points that are raised in paper PR/S2/06/7/2, which sets out the situation well.
There is no reason why we should not mention it. Again, we come back to the point that the Executive should explain more why particular powers are used.
Again, on the basis of the responses that we have received from all the people to whom we wrote, I do not think there is any point in taking the petition further.