The successful appealsinclude those upheld by the panel and also cases where the appeal was resolved infavour of the producer prior to the panel review.Stage 1 Appeals Area Office Received Successful Unsuccessful Ayr 128 37 82 Benbecula 27 3 23 Dumfries 125 36 79 Elgin 33 7 24 Galashiels 98 30 64 Hamilton 88 21 62 Inverness 99 29 65 Inverurie 221 55 154 Kirkwall 45 14 31 Lairg 21 5 15 Lerwick 29 7 23 Oban 31 13 18 Perth 157 45 102 Portree 12 1 8 Stornoway 11 1 9 Thurso 46 9 34 Total 1,171 313 793 Stage 2 Appeals Area Office Received Successful Unsuccessful Ayr 20 3 7 Benbecula 3 0 1 Dumfries 17 3 6 Elgin 8 2 5 Galashiels 17 3 10 Hamilton 12 1 9 Inverness 14 1 7 Inverurie 31 1 15 Kirkwall 5 0 4 Lairg 2 0 0 Lerwick 7 1 4 Oban 8 0 6 Perth 24 1 18 Portree 1 0 1 Stornoway 0 0 0 Thurso 1 1 2 Total 170 17 95 Stage 1Appeals Challenge/National Reserve Appeals** Area Office Received Successful Unsuccessful Ayr 7 3 41 Benbecula 47 1 6 Dumfries 41 2 35 Elgin 7 2 7 Galashiels 50 3 41 Hamilton 12 3 10 Inverness 16 1 14 Inverurie 83 10 72 Kirkwall 16 0 14 Lairg 6 1 4 Lerwick 5 0 5 Oban 11 1 5 Perth 38 0 30 Portree 6 1 4 Stornoway 9 2 7 Thurso 15 2 12 Total 369 32 307 Stage 2 AppealsChallenge/National Reserve Appeals** Area Office Received Successful* Unsuccessful* Ayr 6 Benbecula Dumfries 4 Elgin 2 Galashiels 13 Hamilton 3 Inverness 2 Inverurie 18 Kirkwall 6 Lairg 1 Lerwick Oban 3 Perth 8 Portree Stornoway Thurso 4 Total 70 Notes: **Arising from the reform ofCAP in 2005*36 cases have been reviewedwith recommendations being prepared for minister.Scottish Land Court Cases Area Office Received Successful Unsuccessful Ayr Benbecula Dumfries 2 Elgin 1 1 Galashiels 4 1 Hamilton 1 Inverness 1 Inverurie 3 1 Kirkwall 1 Lairg Lerwick Oban 1 Perth 2 2 Portree Stornoway Thurso 2 Total 18 2 3 S2W-32204