This search includes all content on the Scottish Parliament website, except for Votes and Motions. All Official Reports (what has been said in Parliament) and Questions and Answers are available from 1999. You can refine your search by adding and removing filters.
Professor Black's opinion appears to mirror the points of appeal that were rejected by the Appeal Court, the High Court of Justiciary in the stated cases of Smith, Miller, McMorrine and Robbie the Pict on 16 December 1999.
Has making economic growth a theme as well as a priority made any difference to Government planning? What is the point of stating economic growth as a theme if it is already a priority?
I would like to pursue Karen Gillon's point. Say, for the sake of argument, that we approve this revised guidance so that it can be sent to the promoters, even though it may have to be revised again in future.
I do not think that it is for us to reopen inquiries that are completed or to deal with matters that, from our point of view, are time bound. That is not our role.
I agree that that is an important question. The point might well be put to the chief executive of SFEFC when the committee meets him.I will give the committee a general sense of the position as we understand it.
Which organisations—if any—carry out work that is similar to that which MOJO seeks to promote? Linda Fabiani makes a good point. I was rather disturbed on reading MOJO's submission.