Members have seen the Executive's response and will note that the order will be made available free of charge, which is what we asked for.Are members content to draw the attention of the lead committee and the Parliament to the order on four grounds: a failure to follow proper legislative practice, in so far as it does not include an italic head note that states that the new order will be made available free of charge, and that the explanatory note does not state that the instrument replaces a defective instrument; the failure to follow proper legislative practice or defective drafting in relation to the point on when the order came into force—members may remember that the order should have come in slightly before the other order was revoked— Have you jumped over a point, convener?