This search includes all content on the Scottish Parliament website, except for Votes and Motions. All Official Reports (what has been said in Parliament) and Questions and Answers are available from 1999. You can refine your search by adding and removing filters.
I am obliged.I do not accept Ted Brocklebank's first point. The answer that I gave in good faith is based on the number of vessels that have notified the fisheries department of their exclusive use of category 4(a) gears under the terms of the annex V effort management regime.
We ask the Ministry of Defence and others who make these decisions to take that point of view on board. Yes, the First Minister will defend the regiments' identities, but the simple question is: will he defend their existence?
Action is in hand that will provide what the petitioners have sought to achieve. I broadly agree with that point. However, I refer to the previous Executive response.
Everybody must be clear about what is happening. That is a fair point, Mr Mundell, and it will be transmitted to those who will attend the site visits.
It provides comprehensive information on the operation of Historic Scotland's historic buildings repair grants scheme and of the United Kingdom-wide listed places of worship grants scheme. The main point to emerge is that the level of HBRG is reduced in later phases of repair projects as an alternative source of funding from the LPWG scheme comes into play ...
I am not convinced that there is a problem with the SIP, which is why I made play of the point in Des McNulty's letter. Des McNulty has clearly identified a problem with the differing priorities that are set by Greater Glasgow NHS Board.
First, the accounting change on capital charges is important. Mr Ewing is correct on one point because the change could wait until the autumn or until next year.
The inaccuracies are in the four grid reference points used to locate the corners of the small rectangular-shaped piece of land to which the bill relates.I move amendment 1.