This search includes all content on the Scottish Parliament website, except for Votes and Motions. All Official Reports (what has been said in Parliament) and Questions and Answers are available from 1999. You can refine your search by adding and removing filters.
It strikes me that either we have a timetabling motion that is followed by the Presiding Officer to the letter or we have no such motion. We must not get into an in-between situation.We are a new Parliament, setting off down the road of democracy.
My members have tried hard to take sugar out of products and invest in new developments, but the standards get tighter and tighter all the time, so some of the new products might not be acceptable in schools.
I wonder whether that is to do with getting the mechanisms up and running for the new financial year and, if so, whether we need to make haste on any decisions that we have to take.
I am sure that members of the committee in particular will welcome my response to the issues that they raised.I move amendment 26. We support amendment 26, which is sensible.
You are asking us to believe that it is better to support new, developing companies, even if that means getting rid of long-established, valuable companies.
If an operator is investing heavily, he is hardly going to say, "I am getting a fleet of new, low-floor vehicles, but I will run them only every couple of hours."