This search includes all content on the Scottish Parliament website, except for Votes and Motions. All Official Reports (what has been said in Parliament) and Questions and Answers are available from 1999. You can refine your search by adding and removing filters.
To be serious, we are out of time for parliamentary questions, but if anyone wants to inquire, the issue might be one for a Fife MSP to raise in the new parliamentary session. There is a technical issue that must be investigated.
It is important to the university because it will enhance our research profile. We think that it is important to new medical graduates because it will attract them to the region to study at a more advanced level.In summary, we have held probing consultation within the university and with the other Scottish universities.
The Communities Committee raised the issue in its meeting of 26 May and ministers have agreed to write to that committee to set out the proposed timetable for the publication of guidance on each part of the bill.
I have previously reported on the costs of implementing the new pay agreements and, in exhibit 13 on page 34, I have provided the committee with the Health Department's latest estimate of the additional cost for 2004-05 and 2005-06.
I move to amendment 40, in the name of Bruce Crawford, which we discussed at our previous meeting with amendment 26. It relates to a substantive amendment that was disagreed to.
I am grateful to the Scottish warm homes campaign for appearing today. We considered its petition on 26 April last year when, to a large extent, we were quite a different committee.