This search includes all content on the Scottish Parliament website, except for Votes and Motions. All Official Reports (what has been said in Parliament) and Questions and Answers are available from 1999. You can refine your search by adding and removing filters.
A growing number of Scots believe that the best way to protect their local communities is to say an unequivocal no to any more nuclear power plants in Scotland.
We have tried to persuade the Labour group to shift the date for its away day, but it will not. I am sorry. We have done our best. We always have this difficulty, to a degree.
In an answer to a question from Karen Gillon last month, I said that I would be more than happy to meet her but, at that stage, we concluded that it might be best if we waited until we had fully considered the judgment.
Although that already happens to some extent, quite often we find duplication or gaps. Will he ensure that there is the best possible co-ordination in that respect while maintaining the various bodies' independence?
We were unsure about whether that is the best way to draft a regulation. The Executive has suggested that it will lodge an amendment to section 8, so all that we can do at this stage is draw the Executive's response to the attention of the Parliament.
The First Minister recently announced the establishment of a £6 million interim route development fund for Scottish air links, which will include specific provision for air links into the Highlands and Islands. We regard that as the best way to support those new routes in order to enhance services for the people of the Highlands and Islands.
As we went through the instruments last week, it occurred to me that we should study carefully the best-before dates. Indeed, we should do so more carefully than we have done up until now.There is a question of defective drafting in regulation 4(3) of both regulations, which the Food Standards Agency Scotland has acknowledged.
The issue is important and I will answer the questions as best I can. The Executive is deeply disturbed by recent press reports that suggest that, between 1959 and 1972, children's bones were removed at post mortem for research without parental consent.
In the light of recent experience, I am considering how best we can use the provisions of the Regulation of Care (Scotland) Bill to lever up standards.