This search includes all content on the Scottish Parliament website, except for Votes and Motions. All Official Reports (what has been said in Parliament) and Questions and Answers are available from 1999. You can refine your search by adding and removing filters.
I agree—we will reply that we wrote with the best of intentions and that the Executive would have been better to admit its culpability because we were not reproaching it in any way.
Questions and Answers
Date answered:
24 March 2006
Committees will make decisions about that for various reasons. However, I appreciate the point that she makes. I am sure that the convener of the Procedures Committee has heard her point and that we will consider the issue as our work progresses.
We are considering the 2021 target, its underpinning environmental and economic aims and the best way to achieve them as part of the consultation on the development of the national transport strategy, which was launched on 20 April 2006.
As I said, the research and the conference will help to highlight best practice. Does the minister agree that young people can sometimes be wrongly diagnosed as dyslexic?
If you will allow me, I would like to make a point about the proposed new rule 3.15, on the removal of members of the Scottish Commission for Public Audit, which states that "any member" may, by a motion, propose such a removal.
Fine. No points arise on the regulations.Civil Legal Aid (Scotland) Amendment (No 2) Regulations 2002 (SSI 2002/254) Civil Legal Aid (Scotland) Amendment (No 2) Regulations 2002 (SSI 2002/254) A question of consolidation arises in respect of the regulations.