This search includes all content on the Scottish Parliament website, except for Votes and Motions. All Official Reports (what has been said in Parliament) and Questions and Answers are available from 1999. You can refine your search by adding and removing filters.
The changes have been explained, therefore the question has been answered, but the answer begs the further question of what will happen under the new system. Do you mean because we do not yet know what the new system will produce?
We have received apologies from Pauline McNeill, Sandra White, Margaret Smith and Winnie Ewing.New Petitions New Petitions The first item is new petitions.
Scottish ParliamentFinance CommitteeTuesday 26 June 2001(Morning) Scottish ParliamentFinance CommitteeTuesday 26 June 2001(Morning) The Convener opened the meeting at 10:03Items in Private.
Could we stick to the report on the visit to Wales? We arrived in Wales at a strange time, with the Lib Dems and the Labour party having just established a new Cabinet.
The future of fish farming in Scotland may depend on the substitution of new species for salmon. A moratorium at this time on new species farming would be detrimental to Scotland.
So the amount left will be £55 million less £29 million. Yes. That leaves £26 million. We might expect that to be topped up in part from EYF, if ministers choose to operate the same 75:25 rule as before.
The Executive's letter talks about providing for a"right to buy when rural land comes to be sold, a crofting community right to buy and a right of responsible access."
According to the memorandum, SNBTS does not buy any insurance products. Indeed. Public bodies do not buy commercial insurance products for their day-to-day businesses.