This search includes all content on the Scottish Parliament website, except for Votes and Motions. All Official Reports (what has been said in Parliament) and Questions and Answers are available from 1999. You can refine your search by adding and removing filters.
As members have no comments on the background introduction on pages 1 and 2—paragraphs 1 to 6—or the following section on "Basis of the Common Position"—paragraphs 7 to 17—I will move on.
As members have no comments on the background introduction on pages 1 and 2—paragraphs 1 to 6—or the following section on "Basis of the Common Position"—paragraphs 7 to 17—I will move on.
I thank all members of the Rural Affairs Committee for their handling of stages 1 and 2 of the bill, and I thank representatives of the fishing industry—the Scottish Fishermen's Federation and the Association of Scottish Shellfish Growers—for their participation.
Like Fergus Ewing, I welcome the Executive's position as laid out in sections 9(2)(c) and 23(1). I also welcome the fact that there has been some give on the question of moving from a negative procedure.
According to a written answer at Westminster, extending provision to all school-age children would cost £1.8 billion. It would cost £1 billion to extend provision to primary school children.
The working title of the report is "A Review of the Impact of European List 1 Designated Disease Infectious Salmon Anaemia and List 2 Disease Viral Haemorrhagic Septicaemia on the Scottish Aquaculture Industry".
The working title of the report is "A Review of the Impact of European List 1 Designated Disease Infectious Salmon Anaemia and List 2 Disease Viral Haemorrhagic Septicaemia on the Scottish Aquaculture Industry".
We will lodge further consequential amendments at stage 3. Also during the stage 1 debate, Christine Grahame referred to The Hague Conference on Private International Law and to Professor Eric Clive.