This search includes all content on the Scottish Parliament website, except for Votes and Motions. All Official Reports (what has been said in Parliament) and Questions and Answers are available from 1999. You can refine your search by adding and removing filters.
We have not received any apologies as yet.The first item is to seek the committee's agreement to take its draft report on the evidence on the Vulnerable Witnesses (Scotland) Bill in private at a future meeting. The draft report is likely to be considered on 23 September after we have heard evidence from the Executive next week.
However, the consortium involved in the original negotiations has indicated that it may wish to develop a comprehensive study in a future year, and SNH has offered to provide further advice and guide the development of such a proposal.
The second question is, that motion S1M-3869, in the name of Alex Neil, on the Enterprise and Lifelong Learning Committee report on the future of tourism in Scotland, be agreed to.
We spent some time evaluating how well that process performed, how we would change it in the future, and how we could develop it to ensure that it is even more productive.
Therefore, we will say that the committee would be minded to block similar statutory instruments in future, so long as there were no financial consequences for anyone.
That would be difficult to pick up in this year's budget figures, but it will be important to track it in the future. I should point out that we must report to the Finance Committee on this matter by tomorrow.
I have written back to all the people from whom Tommy received letters and I have asked Martin Verity to put that on a future agenda. I will also give you the latest letters, convener.
This is a question for all members of the committee; perhaps it is a matter for future discussion. We have mentioned what emerged about the budget from which the money for Scottish Opera was drawn, and where the money for Hampden came from.