- Asked by: Patrick Harvie, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 23 June 2025
-
Current Status:
Answer expected on 21 July 2025
To ask the Scottish Government whether the Scottish Trades Union Congress (STUC) Freelance and Forgotten report will be considered by the (a) Culture Fair Work Taskforce when making its recommendations and (b) Scottish Ministers when
considering the taskforce’s recommendations.
Answer
Answer expected on 21 July 2025
- Asked by: Patrick Harvie, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 23 June 2025
-
Current Status:
Answer expected on 21 July 2025
To ask the Scottish Government whether any additional Barnett consequential funding is
available as a result of the UK Government’s reported additional investment for
dealing with reinforced autoclaved aerated concrete (RAAC) in English schools,
and whether it has profiled any capital spend for dealing with RAAC in school
estates in Scotland.
Answer
Answer expected on 21 July 2025
- Asked by: Patrick Harvie, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 20 June 2025
-
Current Status:
Answer expected on 18 July 2025
To ask the Scottish Government whether it will update its Fair Work First guidance to recognise that "Unions – not staff forums – are the legitimate voice of workers", as recommended in the Scottish Trades Union Congress (STUC) report, Freelance and Forgotten.
Answer
Answer expected on 18 July 2025
- Asked by: Patrick Harvie, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 20 June 2025
-
Current Status:
Answer expected on 18 July 2025
To ask the Scottish Government when the Culture Fair Work Taskforce is expected to publish its recommendations.
Answer
Answer expected on 18 July 2025
- Asked by: Patrick Harvie, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 06 June 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ivan McKee on 19 June 2025
To ask the Scottish Government what action it has taken, since the publication of the International Court of Justice's 19 July 2024 advisory opinion, to ensure that public bodies are enacting the Scottish Government's 2014 public procurement policy note in relation to discouraging trade and investment from illegal settlements.
Answer
Regulations implementing international obligations in relation to public procurement permit bidders to be excluded from tender exercises in certain circumstances. This includes when the bidder can be shown to have engaged in grave professional misconduct. The Scottish Government's long-standing view is that the exploitation of assets in illegal settlements is likely to be regarded as constituting grave professional misconduct for this purpose. Any decision to exclude a bidder from a procurement process must, however, be taken on a case-by-case basis by the contracting authority awarding the contract, and must be grounded in evidence. To that end, the Minister for Business wrote to public bodies in October 2024 to inform them that the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights' (OHCHR) database of companies active in listed activity in the Occupied Palestinian Territory had been updated, and that this should be considered as part of due diligence processes.
As I confirmed in response to S6O-04782 on 11 June 2025, I have asked officials to advise on what further work can be done to strengthen our approach here.
All answers to Oral Parliamentary Questions are available on the Parliament’s website, the search facility for which can be found at All answers to Oral Parliamentary Questions are available on the Parliament’s website, the search facility for which can be found at Official Report: search what was said in Parliament | Scottish Parliament Website
- Asked by: Patrick Harvie, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 16 June 2025
-
Current Status:
Taken in the Chamber on 19 June 2025
Question to be taken in Chamber.
Answer
Taken in the Chamber on 19 June 2025
- Asked by: Patrick Harvie, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 12 June 2025
-
Current Status:
Taken in the Chamber on 19 June 2025
To ask the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body what responses have been received from LGBTQ+ staff or organisations that it has consulted with, or been contacted by, since the announcement of its interim policy on Parliament facilities, following the UK Supreme Court ruling.
Answer
Taken in the Chamber on 19 June 2025
- Asked by: Patrick Harvie, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 27 May 2025
-
Current Status:
Taken in the Chamber on 29 May 2025
Question to be taken in Chamber.
Answer
Taken in the Chamber on 29 May 2025
- Asked by: Patrick Harvie, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 09 May 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Kate Forbes on 21 May 2025
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S6W-36651 by Kate Forbes on 30 April 2025, whether it will provide further details and updated information on how it evaluates whether its grant conditions are successful in achieving diversification away from arms manufacturing.
Answer
This is an operational matter for our Enterprise Agencies. I have asked each of their Chief Executives to write to you with a full response.
- Asked by: Patrick Harvie, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 08 May 2025
-
Current Status:
Answered by Fiona Hyslop on 20 May 2025
To ask the Scottish Government what assessment it has made of the potential impact on (a) Glasgow, (b) the NHS and (c) emergency services of the reported proposed industrial action by staff at the Clyde Tunnel.
Answer
Transport Scotland are aware of the proposed industrial action by staff at the Clyde Tunnel, however no assessment has been made as the Clyde Tunnel is a local road under the responsibility of Glasgow City Council.
It would be a matter for the Council to assess the proposed impact and engage with stakeholders who may be affected.