Chamber and committees

The budgets allocated are as follows:

Scotland’s AI Strategy was published in March 2021. Taking account of recent and fast-paced technological developments and a growing international focus on the opportunities and threats which AI can offer, it is essential that Scotland has in place a strategy which keeps us on the forefront of those developments.

In a Scottish Parliament debate on 1 June 2023, I announced that I would ask the Scottish AI Alliance Leadership Group to undertake an independent review setting out what Scotland needs to do to optimise the benefits of AI. The review will set out recommendations on how we can maximise the potential of AI whilst minimising its risk and ensuring benefit for all.

The final review report and recommendations are expected to be available in early 2024, and will be shared publicly when available. The review is not a formal update of the strategy, more a refocus and refresh given the speed of development.

I last met with the COSLA Culture Conveners group on 21 September 2023.

During this meeting we discussed ways in which we can collaborate to progress our shared priorities for culture in Scotland.

The next meeting of the Culture Conveners, which I will attend, is scheduled to take place in early 2024.

This is an operational matter for ScotRail, though we can advise that the Scottish Government does not support Driver Only Operation and continues to specify a requirement for a second member of staff to assist passengers on every ScotRail train.

I fully appreciate the need to get bookings released early so that businesses and individuals can plan ahead. The Scottish Government is aiming to confirm fares in the coming weeks to allow bookings to be opened beyond 31 March 2024.

This is an operational matter for ScotRail.

Government analysis concluded that the Bill could not extend compulsory measures beyond 18 using the children’s hearings system. This would fundamentally change the child welfare-based system, and require an entirely new framework. The tests needed to justify compulsion beyond childhood would require to be restated to accommodate the rights of evolving young adults, with limited suitable options for dealing with non-compliance. Such an approach could also cause capacity issues, including for the volunteer panel members, who would be making decisions in relation to young adults as opposed to children.

The Bill also includes powers to enable those who are remanded or sentenced under 18 to detention in secure accommodation, to remain in secure accommodation until a maximum age of 19. This is to prevent young people – where their sentence is due to end shortly after their turning 18 – being automatically conveyed to serve a short outstanding part of that sentence in a Young Offenders’ Institution. This is therefore directed at minimising placement moves and avoiding unnecessary risks, disruption or trauma. This is in line with UNCRC.

The definition of a Compulsory Supervision Order (CSO) is set out in section 83 of the Children’s Hearings (Scotland) Act 2011 and, as set out below, specifies the measures which can be included in a CSO.

A children's hearing can make a CSO if the hearing considers that it is necessary for the child’s protection, guidance, treatment or control.

A CSO must then be implemented by the relevant local authority to ensure that the child is adequately supported in accordance with the CSO.

Every CSO will as a minimum contain a standard measure that the local authority supervises the child, and will specify the period of time that the order has effect.

Children’s hearings can, where appropriate, make their intentions for supervision more specific by adding further specific measures to a CSO:

• A requirement that the child reside in a specific place.
• A direction to restrict the child's liberty whilst residing in a specific place.
• A prohibition on the disclosure of the address of the child where the child is required to reside in a specified place.
• A movement restriction condition.
• A secure accommodation authorisation.
• A requirement for specified medical or other examination for the child- only with the child's consent.
• A requirement for specified medical or other treatment for the child-only with the child's consent.

Children’s Hearings Scotland (‘CHS’) are preparing to extend the benefits of accessing children’s hearings to all Scotland’s 16 and 17 year olds who need it. It is the statutory responsibility of the National Convener at CHS to appoint children’s panel members. There is a consistent record dating back over 5 decades of sufficient prospective volunteers coming forward from Scotland’s communities to serve as children’s panel members. While volunteer positions across all sectors are more difficult to fill post-pandemic, Ministers are confident that the National Convener and CHS have the resources, skills and knowledge to fulfil their statutory duties. Officials remain in close contact with the National Convener and his team to determine if further interventions are required to maintain children’s panel capacity and resilience, both in the short-term and in the months to come. A range of escalating interventions have been prepared by CHS to improve panel intake and reinforce retention rates - those will be implemented as required.

Each child is considered in respect of their individual needs and risks when they are referred to the Principal Reporter, or where a children’s hearing is to be convened. The Scottish Government is not aware of evidence of inappropriate or unequal treatment between care-experienced children and those who do not have care experience or are coming to the system’s attention for the first time.