- Asked by: Mark Griffin, MSP for Central Scot and Lothians West, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 04 August 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shirley-Anne Somerville on 24 August 2026
To ask the Scottish Government what arrangements it plans to put in place to monitor and evaluate the performance and effectiveness of More Homes Scotland, including any plans for independent scrutiny of its impact on housing supply, affordability and homelessness.
Answer
As More Homes Scotland is currently being established, arrangements for monitoring and evaluating its performance remain under development. Appropriate governance, accountability and scrutiny arrangements will assess the agency’s effectiveness and impact, including its contribution to increasing housing supply, delivering affordable homes and addressing homelessness.
The agency will be delivered in phases over this Parliamentary Session, beginning with organisational set-up, governance and operational capability in 2027-28. As delivery expands, robust performance and reporting measures will support ongoing assessment of outcomes.
- Asked by: Ariane Burgess, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 06 August 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Gillian Martin on 24 August 2026
To ask the Scottish Government whether it will make a statement to the Parliament on its response to Environmental Standards Scotland's finding that Scottish Ministers have not effectively discharged their duties under Regulations 4 and 14 and have failed to comply with Regulation 13 of the Marine Strategy Regulations 2010.
Answer
The Scottish Government is carefully considering the findings and recommendations of Environmental Standards Scotland (ESS) contained in its report Protecting Scotland’s Seafloor: an assessment of Scottish Ministers’ implementation of the Marine Strategy Regulations 2010, and will work constructively with ESS to seek to agree an appropriate action plan within the timescale suggested in the report.
The Scottish Government will set out its position on the report's findings and recommendations through that engagement and in its formal response, updating the Scottish Parliament as appropriate in this respect.
- Asked by: Sanne Dijkstra-Downie, MSP for Edinburgh Northern, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 30 July 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Stephen Flynn on 24 August 2026
To ask the Scottish Government whether it has any plans to extend free bus travel or any other free travel schemes to military veterans, and whether it will provide an update on any consideration it has given to this issue since it was discussed during the previous parliamentary session.
Answer
The Scottish Government greatly values the contribution made by military veterans and recognises the importance of supporting the Armed Forces community.
Veterans resident in Scotland are eligible to access the existing National Concessionary Travel Schemes where they meet the existing age or disability-related eligibility criteria, including those relating to mobility, injury, or receipt of specific benefits.
Veterans can also access discounted rail travel through the Veterans Railcard, which is available across Great Britain and provides one-third off most rail fares.
- Asked by: Mark Griffin, MSP for Central Scot and Lothians West, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Friday, 31 July 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shirley-Anne Somerville on 24 August 2026
To ask the Scottish Government what steps it is taking to ensure that the current review of Section 2 (Fire) of the Technical Handbooks does not result in any weakening of current fire safety standards.
Answer
As part of the Scottish Government’s response to the Grenfell Tower Inquiry Phase 2 Report, a full review of Section 2 (Fire) of the building standards will strengthen, and not weaken, fire safety standards in Scotland. This review is being informed by a Call for Evidence, undertaken between 16 January and 10 April 2026, which will identify fire safety priorities for review. The review will be advised by an independent expert panel, and supported by targeted research and stakeholder engagement. These measures will ensure that future changes are evidence-based, technically robust and improve fire safety outcomes.
- Asked by: Mark Griffin, MSP for Central Scot and Lothians West, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Friday, 31 July 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Shirley-Anne Somerville on 24 August 2026
To ask the Scottish Government, in light of the findings of the Grenfell Tower Inquiry report, for what reason BS 8414 continues to form part of both domestic and non-domestic technical handbooks in Scotland, and whether it considers that removing this from the handbooks would provide greater clarity and certainty for those involved in the design, construction and control of buildings.
Answer
BS 8414 testing and BR 135 assessments were removed as an alternative compliance route for buildings covered by the combustible cladding ban in 2022. BS 8414 remains available for buildings outside the ban’s scope.
In response to the Grenfell Tower Inquiry Phase 2 Report, a wider review of fire safety standards is underway, informed by recent evidence, UK Government research on BS 8414 and developments in fire performance testing.
- Asked by: Duncan Dunlop, MSP for South Scotland, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 11 August 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Stephen Flynn on 24 August 2026
To ask the Scottish Government what assessment it has made of whether the current concessionary travel reimbursement rate model adequately reflects the higher average fare, and therefore higher revenue-forgone cost, of rural bus journeys compared with urban journeys.
Answer
National Concessionary Travel Schemes reimbursement rates are negotiated annually between Transport Scotland and the Confederation of Passenger Transport on behalf of bus operators, using an agreed economic model. The model is updated annually to take into account the latest developments in fares, operating costs, passenger behaviours and travel demand, to ensure that the rates are set to leave operators financially no better and no worse off for their participation in the schemes. The model uses a weighted average fare, which reflects the fares and relative volume of concessionary journeys made on all services under the scheme.
- Asked by: Lorna Slater, MSP for Edinburgh Central, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 10 August 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Stephen Flynn on 24 August 2026
To ask the Scottish Government in light of the UK Government’s response to Wendy Chamberlain UIN 469 tabled on 13 May 2026, whether (a) it intends to bring forward amendments to the Traffic Signs Regulations and General Directions 2016, and (b), if so, what amendments it is considering
Answer
Transport Scotland officials are engaging with UK Department for Transport regarding its proposed amendments to the UK Traffic Signs Regulations and General Directions 2016, including side road zebra crossings as noted in the UK Government’s response to Wendy Chamberlain MP, UIN 469.
Should it be established that side road zebra crossings are appropriate for use in Scotland, their incorporation in Traffic Signs Regulations and General Directions 2016 as it applies in Scotland is intended. Scottish Ministers are yet to determine what other amendments will be progressed. Any amendments would be subject to consultation.
- Asked by: Julie MacDougall, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Reform UK
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 29 July 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Stephen Flynn on 24 August 2026
To ask the Scottish Government whether it plans to introduce centralised data collection regarding the numbers of reported potholes on roads and public pathways across Scotland.
Answer
Transport Scotland is responsible for the management and maintenance of the strategic trunk road network, including motorways, on behalf of Scottish Ministers. It operates a centralised database system for the use of term maintenance contractors to record potholes on the trunk road network.
Local authorities have a duty under the Roads (Scotland) Act 1984 to manage and maintain local roads in their area and duties under the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 to secure expeditious, convenient and safe movement of traffic.
Local Authorities hold information on defects recorded on their roads and the Scottish Government has no plans to collect centralised data with regards to the number of potholes on the local road network.
- Asked by: Kayleigh Kinross-O'Neill, MSP for Edinburgh and Lothians East, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 05 August 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ivan McKee on 24 August 2026
To ask the Scottish Government, in relation to the Seabird Compensation Plan, which the developer of Berwick Bank offshore windfarm is required to prepare as a condition of its section 36 consent, whether it expects compensation activities set out in the plan to be delivered in Scotland and the UK, and whether it would consider activities delivered elsewhere in Europe and around the world to be eligible for inclusion in the plan.
Answer
Each project specific Seabird Compensation Plan is considered on case by case basis in line with regulation and relevant guidance – it would not be appropriate to comment further on the content of individual Seabird Compensation Plans until they are submitted. There is nothing in regulations to preclude Seabird Compensation Plans including compensation measures delivered outside Scotland or the UK as long as it can be demonstrated that the compensatory measures proposed benefit the UK Marine Protected Area network.
- Asked by: Claire Baker, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 06 August 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Stephen Gethins on 24 August 2026
To ask the Scottish Government, in relation to its working paper on refreshing the Good Practice Principles for Community Benefits from Onshore Renewable Energy, published on 18 February 2026, when it expects the recommended community benefit fund level for solar developments to take effect.
Answer
The recommended community benefit fund level for solar developments will be set out in the refreshed Good Practice Principles for Community Benefits from Onshore Renewable Energy Developments. Decisions on implementation arrangements, including when any revised recommended fund levels should take effect, are subject to Ministerial approval.
The Good Practice Principles are non-statutory guidance and the recommended community benefit fund levels are voluntary. The Scottish Government continues to call on the UK Government to use its reserved powers to mandate community benefits for mature onshore renewable energy technologies.