- Asked by: Miles Briggs, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 30 May 2019
-
Current Status:
Answered by Clare Haughey on 6 June 2019
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answers to questions S5W-23058 and S5W-23292 by Clare Haughey on 16 and 29 May 2019 respectively, in light of the assertion in the initial response that "very few people who access mental health care and treatment are ever treated against their will", what its response is to the Mental Welfare Commission for Scotland reporting that it was notified of 5,647 new episodes of compulsory treatment in 2017-18.
Answer
Our mental health legislation is based on rights and principles and offers protection for patients where compulsory treatment is necessary. Any increase in compulsory treatments may represent the effects of more people coming forward for treatment and increased awareness and response to mental ill health. It’s also important to note that the largest proportion of people subject to compulsion are for short-term orders rather than long-term orders.
We are making significant investment in the range of mental health support available, which will see issues tackled earlier and where possible in the community, while ensuring speedier access to specialist care for those who need it. We will continue to work with the Mental Welfare Commission for Scotland and stakeholders both to ensure these orders are used correctly, and to promote patients’ rights more generally.
- Asked by: Miles Briggs, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 28 May 2019
-
Current Status:
Answered by Clare Haughey on 6 June 2019
To ask the Scottish Government what the remit will be of the chair of the committee that is to review mental health legislation.
Answer
Scottish Ministers recently announced the appointment of John Scott QC as Chair of the review.
We have been clear that it is for the Chair to determine how the review work will be taken forward. However, this will include appointing a review group whose remit will include agreeing the terms of reference, ensuring each stage of the process has an engagement strategy which is not only transparent but also affords the opportunity to gather as wide-ranging views as possible by engaging people with real experiences, service users, carers and professionals, as well as those with a more academic interest.
We have also publically stated that the principal aim of the review is to improve the rights and protections of persons with a mental disorder and remove barriers to those caring for their health and welfare. The Chair will therefore provide leadership which will deliver on these aims by:
- reviewing the developments in mental health law and practice on compulsory detention and care and treatment since the Mental Health (Care and Treatment) (Scotland) Act 2003 came into force;
- making recommendations that give effect to the rights, will and preferences of the individual by ensuring that mental health, incapacity and adult support and protection legislation reflects people’s social, economic and cultural rights including UNCRPD and ECHR requirements; and
- considering the need for the convergence of incapacity, mental health and adult support and protection legislation.
- Asked by: Miles Briggs, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 29 May 2019
-
Current Status:
Answered by Kevin Stewart on 6 June 2019
To ask the Scottish Government how it works with local authorities to encourage the greater use of stone and slate from Scotland in buildings and streetscapes.
Answer
Scottish Government provides a framework of policy guidance on planning and architecture that supports local authorities in promoting development that responds appropriately to its context.
This reinforces the identity and character of Scotland’s communities and the use of appropriate materials is recognised as a key consideration in that.
- Asked by: Miles Briggs, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 28 May 2019
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jeane Freeman on 5 June 2019
To ask the Scottish Government whether it will amend Scottish Health and Social Care Standards so that these do not condone the use of chemical restraint.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer to question S5W-22466 on 23 May 2019. All answers to written parliamentary questions are available on the Parliament's website, the search facility for which can be found at http://www.parliament.scot/parliamentarybusiness/28877.aspx .
- Asked by: Miles Briggs, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 22 May 2019
-
Current Status:
Answered by John Swinney on 4 June 2019
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S5W-16303 by John Swinney on 9 May 2018, whether it will provide the same information for 2018.
Answer
a) Number of pupils with additional support needs (ASN) by Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation (SIMD) deciles, 2014-2018.
SIMD Decile 1 | Year |
2014 3 | 2015 3 | 2016 3 | 2017 | 2018 |
1 = Most deprivation | 22,612 | 23,462 | 26,132 | 27,197 | 30,868 |
2 | 16,871 | 18,314 | 22,802 | 24,232 | 26,320 |
3 | 14,551 | 16,107 | 19,075 | 20,923 | 22,719 |
4 | 14,932 | 16,316 | 17,816 | 19,107 | 20,537 |
5 | 13,615 | 14,778 | 16,143 | 17,554 | 18,947 |
6 | 12,981 | 14,562 | 15,294 | 16,348 | 17,391 |
7 | 13,247 | 15,000 | 15,035 | 16,399 | 17,508 |
8 | 12,229 | 13,590 | 14,088 | 15,484 | 16,492 |
9 | 10,580 | 11,547 | 13,286 | 14,504 | 15,597 |
10 = Least deprivation | 7,810 | 8,497 | 10,372 | 11,352 | 12,327 |
No SIMD Data 2 | 1,073 | 970 | 399 | 391 | 359 |
1. SIMD 2012 deciles are used for 2014 and 2015, and SIMD 2016 deciles are used for 2016-2018. |
2. Includes all pupils at Grant Aided special schools and a number of pupils at local authority schools for whom no SIMD data was available. Pupils at Grant Aided special schools were not included in this row in the answer to S5W-16303. |
3. The total number of pupils with an ASN differs slightly to published figures for 2014-2016 due to corrections made to Grant Aided special school pupil numbers. |
4. The total number of pupils with an ASN differs slightly to that reported in the answer to question S5W-16303 as pupils at Grant Aided special schools have been included with those with no SIMD data in this answer. |
b) Percetange of pupils with additional support needs (ASN) by Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation (SIMD) decile, 2014-2018.
SIMD Decile 1 | Year |
2014 3 | 2015 3 | 2016 3 | 2017 | 2018 |
1 = Most deprivation | 16.09 | 15.32 | 15.33 | 14.82 | 15.51 |
2 | 12.01 | 11.96 | 13.38 | 13.21 | 13.22 |
3 | 10.36 | 10.52 | 11.19 | 11.40 | 11.41 |
4 | 10.63 | 10.65 | 10.45 | 10.41 | 10.32 |
5 | 9.69 | 9.65 | 9.47 | 9.57 | 9.52 |
6 | 9.24 | 9.51 | 8.97 | 8.91 | 8.74 |
7 | 9.43 | 9.79 | 8.82 | 8.94 | 8.80 |
8 | 8.70 | 8.87 | 8.27 | 8.44 | 8.28 |
9 | 7.53 | 7.54 | 7.80 | 7.90 | 7.84 |
10 = Least deprivation | 5.56 | 5.55 | 6.09 | 6.19 | 6.19 |
No SIMD Data 2 | 0.76 | 0.63 | 0.23 | 0.21 | 0.18 |
1. SIMD12 deciles are used for 2014 and 2015, and SIMD16 deciles are used for 2016-2018. |
2. Includes all pupils at Grant Aided special schools and a number of pupils at local authority schools for whom no SIMD data was available. Pupils at Grant Aided special schools were not included in this row in the answer to S5W-16303. |
3. The total number of pupils with an ASN differs slightly to published figures for 2014-2016 due to corrections made to Grant Aided special school pupil numbers. |
4. Percentages may differ slightly to those in the answer to question S5W-16303 as pupils at Grant Aided special schools have been included with those with no SIMD data. This affects the total number of pupils with ASN used to calculate these figures. |
- Asked by: Miles Briggs, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 22 May 2019
-
Current Status:
Answered by John Swinney on 4 June 2019
To ask the Scottish Government (a) how many and (b) what percentage of pupils with a co-ordinated support plan there have been in each of the last five years, broken down by Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation (SIMD) decile.
Answer
a) Number of pupils with a Co-ordinated Support Plan (CSP) by Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation (SIMD) decile, 2014-2018.
SIMD Decile 1 | Year |
2014 3 | 2015 3 | 2016 3 | 2017 | 2018 |
1 = Most deprivation | 358 | 308 | 237 | 220 | 204 |
2 | 290 | 242 | 230 | 204 | 185 |
3 | 311 | 281 | 242 | 214 | 217 |
4 | 306 | 282 | 255 | 236 | 220 |
5 | 309 | 276 | 236 | 249 | 229 |
6 | 360 | 296 | 254 | 235 | 191 |
7 | 320 | 283 | 236 | 220 | 199 |
8 | 280 | 260 | 208 | 193 | 166 |
9 | 269 | 228 | 207 | 181 | 170 |
10 = Least deprivation | 227 | 180 | 210 | 191 | 165 |
No SIMD Data 2 | 83 | 61 | 45 | 39 | 40 |
1. SIMD 2012 deciles are used for 2014 and 2015, and SIMD 2016 deciles are used for 2016-2018. |
2. Includes all pupils with CSPs at Grant Aided special schools and a number of pupils with CSPs at local authority schools for whom no SIMD data was available. |
3. The total number of pupils with a CSP differs slightly to published figures for 2014-2016 due to corrections made to Grant Aided special school pupil numbers. |
b) Percentage of pupils with a Co-ordinated Support Plan (CSP) by Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation (SIMD) decile, 2014-2018.
SIMD Decile 1 | Year |
2014 3 | 2015 3 | 2016 3 | 2017 | 2018 |
1 = Most deprivation | 11.50 | 11.42 | 10.04 | 10.08 | 10.27 |
2 | 9.32 | 8.97 | 9.75 | 9.35 | 9.32 |
3 | 9.99 | 10.42 | 10.25 | 9.81 | 10.93 |
4 | 9.83 | 10.46 | 10.81 | 10.82 | 11.08 |
5 | 9.93 | 10.23 | 10.00 | 11.41 | 11.53 |
6 | 11.56 | 10.98 | 10.76 | 10.77 | 9.62 |
7 | 10.28 | 10.49 | 10.00 | 10.08 | 10.02 |
8 | 8.99 | 9.64 | 8.81 | 8.85 | 8.36 |
9 | 8.64 | 8.45 | 8.77 | 8.30 | 8.56 |
10 = Least deprivation | 7.29 | 6.67 | 8.90 | 8.75 | 8.31 |
No SIMD Data 2 | 2.67 | 2.26 | 1.91 | 1.79 | 2.01 |
1. SIMD12 deciles are used for 2014 and 2015, and SIMD16 deciles are used for 2016-2018. |
2. Includes all pupils with CSPs at Grant Aided special schools and a number of pupils with CSPs at local authority schools for whom no SIMD data was available. |
3. The total number of pupils with a CSP differs slightly to published figures for 2014-2016 due to corrections made to Grant Aided special school pupil numbers. |
- Asked by: Miles Briggs, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 21 May 2019
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jeane Freeman on 4 June 2019
To ask the Scottish Government, further to the answer to question S5W-20295 by Jeane Freeman on 21 December 2018, how many missed NHS appointments there were in 2018-19.
Answer
The Scottish Government does not currently hold information on the number of missed appointments during 2018-19. This information will be published later this year and will be available at: https://www.isdscotland.org/Health-Topics/Hospital-Care/Publications/
The number of Did Not Attends (DNA) for new outpatient appointments in Scotland between April 2018 to December 2018 (inclusive) was 83,332.
- Asked by: Miles Briggs, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 20 May 2019
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jeane Freeman on 30 May 2019
To ask the Scottish Government whether delaying the proposed new clinical decision support system will lead to radiology breaking away from the national project and, if so, what the impact of this will be.
Answer
The national clinical decision support (CDS) discovery project has considered how a national proposal to CDS Platform might benefit clinical decision across NHS services. Radiology has been part of that project. SG officials have recently met with representatives of the Scottish Radiology Transformation Project (SRTP) CDS steering group to discuss key interdependencies and associated risks between a proposed National Decision Support Platform and the radiology project providing CDS to that speciality. Radiology colleagues are considering future options for the STRP and an SG decision on a national platform is due over the Summer.
- Asked by: Miles Briggs, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 20 May 2019
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jeane Freeman on 30 May 2019
To ask the Scottish Government, in light of it being an open standards solution, for what reason it is halting work on implementing the proposed new clinical decision support system.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer to S5W-23295 on 30 May 2019. All answers to written parliamentary questions are available on the Parliament's website, the search facility for which can be found at http://www.parliament.scot/parliamentarybusiness/28877.aspx .
- Asked by: Miles Briggs, MSP for Lothian, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 20 May 2019
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jeane Freeman on 30 May 2019
To ask the Scottish Government what the purpose is of the review of the clinical decision support system; whether it will publish the review's criteria; what questions are being asked in the review, and which clinicians are in the review team.
Answer
A review is currently being scoped to provide due diligence over the consideration of the business case for a National Decision Support Platform. I will be happy to update the member on the outcome of the review once it is concluded.