Chamber and committees

Questions and answers

Parliamentary questions can be asked by any MSP to the Scottish Government or the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body. The questions provide a means for MSPs to get factual and statistical information.

Written questions must be answered within 10 working days (20 working days during recess)
Other questions such as Topical, Portfolio, General and First Minister's Question Times are taken in the Chamber

Urgent Questions aren't included in the Question and Answers search. There is a SPICe fact sheet listing Urgent and emergency questions.

Find out more about parliamentary questions

Filter your results Hide all filters

Displaying 43 questions Show Answers

Order by |

Question reference: S4O-00904

Asked by: Humza Yousaf, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish National Party
Date lodged: Wednesday, 11 April 2012
Current Status: Taken in the Chamber on 19 April 2012

To ask the Scottish Executive what improvements are being made in the regeneration of Glasgow’s infrastructure in preparation for the 2014 Commonwealth Games.

Question reference: S4O-00868

Asked by: Humza Yousaf, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish National Party
Date lodged: Wednesday, 21 March 2012
Current Status: Taken in the Chamber on 29 March 2012

To ask the Scottish Executive what impact the recently announced additional funding for insulin pumps will have on Glasgow.

Question reference: S4O-00682

Asked by: Humza Yousaf, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish National Party
Date lodged: Wednesday, 01 February 2012
Current Status: Taken in the Chamber on 9 February 2012

To ask the Scottish Executive what progress is being made on reducing nitrogen dioxide levels and improving air quality in Glasgow.

Question reference: S4O-00630

Asked by: Humza Yousaf, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish National Party
Date lodged: Wednesday, 25 January 2012
Current Status: Taken in the Chamber on 2 February 2012

To ask the Scottish Executive what recent discussions it has had with the Scottish Road Works Commissioner.

Question reference: S4F-00392

Asked by: Humza Yousaf, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish National Party
Date lodged: Monday, 09 January 2012
Current Status: Taken in the Chamber on 12 January 2012

To ask the First Minister what action the Crown Office has taken in response to legislative changes relating to double jeopardy.

Question reference: S4W-04640

Asked by: Humza Yousaf, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish National Party
Date lodged: Friday, 16 December 2011
Current Status: Initiated by the Scottish Government. Answered by Nicola Sturgeon on 19 December 2011

To ask the Scottish Executive whether it has come to a decision regarding the service change proposals submitted by NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde for approval that older people’s inpatient rehabilitation beds be transferred from Lightburn Hospital to Stobhill Hospital, that day hospital and outpatient services be transferred to Glasgow Royal Infirmary and that Lightburn Hospital be closed.

I have today written to the Chief Executive of NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde to confirm my decision in relation to the Lightburn Hospital service change proposals.

I have carefully considered all the available information and representations and am not convinced by the board’s case for change. As such, I am rejecting NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde’s proposal to transfer the inpatient and outpatient/day case services from Lightburn Hospital, and the request to close the facility; and have asked that the board now works to maintain and improve the quality of the service delivered from the hospital, in the best interests of local people.

In considering these proposals my paramount concern has been whether the benefits to patients of co-locating the inpatient, outpatient and day hospital services for older people in North East Glasgow on two larger hospital sites outweighs the obvious drawbacks around geographical access for a vulnerable patient group from one of the most disadvantaged communities in Scotland. I have repeatedly heard – not least from local patients and clinicians - that Lightburn Hospital provides high quality services that are greatly valued by the community. I am extremely conscious of the socio-economic and demographic profile of the area; and that the proposals combined with difficult public transport links could not only disadvantage the community, but also potentially act as a disincentive to some local people with significant health concerns and poor health outlooks accessing necessary care and treatment. I have heard from local patients who are clear that they do not wish to be admitted to an acute inpatient facility hospital but are prepared to attend the day hospital at Lightburn where they can receive the multi-disciplinary input needed to get them back on their feet again. This position is consistent with the national policy direction to treat people as locally as possible; encouraging as much care in the community as is practicable, whilst preventing inappropriate admissions to hospitals. This particularly applies to the outpatient and day hospital services.

I am also conscious of the argument in this case, reinforced by some local clinicians, that the effective rehabilitation of this patient group is best served by continuing to base the service in the local community; preserving easy geographical access to visitors, many of whom are from the same age group and would find the journey to Stobhill in particular most challenging. The benefits of the proposals for patients would therefore have to be clear and compelling to over-ride my real concerns about limiting geographical access to healthcare services in this community.

Hospital services are not static and need to change, and in that context this has been a difficult decision. However, in this particular case I am not convinced by the board’s proposal for change, and am persuaded by the argument for maintaining local access to what is clearly regarded as valuable and high quality local facility.

The government has a policy of maintaining local access to healthcare services where it is appropriate to do so, and where it is in patient’s best interests. It is my view, having carefully considered all the evidence and representations – not least around the adequacy and availability of the public transport options - that local people’s interests are best served by maintaining Lightburn Hospital and its healthcare services.

I have therefore asked that the board now works to maintain and improve the quality of the service delivered from the hospital, in the best interests of local people.

Question reference: S4O-00522

Asked by: Humza Yousaf, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish National Party
Date lodged: Wednesday, 14 December 2011
Current Status: Taken in the Chamber on 22 December 2011

To ask the Scottish Executive how it raises awareness of environmental issues in cities.

Question reference: S4W-02215

Asked by: Humza Yousaf, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish National Party
Date lodged: Monday, 15 August 2011
Current Status: Answered by Fergus Ewing on 9 September 2011

To ask the Scottish Executive how it is encouraging entrepreneurship and business start-up amongst people who are deaf or hard of hearing.

Business Gateway provides support for encouraging entrepreneurship and start-up advice and assistance for existing businesses. The delivery of Business Gateway is the responsibility of local authorities and is the key delivery channel offering a first point of contact or all publicly funded advice to businesses in Scotland. It provides advice and support on a number of aspects associated with forming and developing a business such as marketing, business advice and financial management. Full details of the services can be accessed on the Business Gateway website www.bgateway.com including details, through a minicom number 0800 023 2071, for deaf or hard of hearing individuals and entrepreneurs.

Question reference: S4O-00163

Asked by: Humza Yousaf, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish National Party
Date lodged: Wednesday, 07 September 2011
Current Status: Taken in the Chamber on 15 September 2011

To ask the Scottish Executive what progress the Cabinet Secretary for Education and Lifelong Learning has made to exempt students on 2 plus 2 degrees and those moving from undergraduate to postgraduate degrees from paying council tax.

Question reference: S4W-02214

Asked by: Humza Yousaf, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish National Party
Date lodged: Monday, 15 August 2011
Current Status: Answered by Michael Matheson on 5 September 2011

To ask the Scottish Executive what steps it is taking to make public services more accessible for people who are deaf or hard of hearing.

In the first place the public sector equality duty in the Equality Act 2010, which came into force on 5 April, requires public authorities to have “due regard” to the need to eliminate discrimination, victimisation and harassment which are unlawful under the act; to advance equality of opportunity, and to foster good relations. The Equality and Human Rights Commission has produced guidance to help public authorities respond to the duty.

The Scottish Government works with a number of organisations to raise awareness of issues that affect the deaf community, to ensure the views of deaf people are heard, and to reduce barriers to inclusion for deaf people to bring about an improvement in service planning and delivery.