- Asked by: Liam McArthur, MSP for Orkney, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 06 October 2010
-
Current Status:
Answered by Richard Lochhead on 28 October 2010
To ask the Scottish Executive what discussions it has had with stakeholders regarding the penalty regime associated with an over declaration of eligible land under the Single Farm Payment and Less Favoured Area Support schemes.
Answer
The Scottish Government''s Rural Payments and Inspections Directorate (SGRPID) has worked with the National Farmers Union of Scotland (NFUS), and taken its advice, on how best to communicate with farmers and crofters on how they can avoid penalties by claiming only land that meets eligibility requirements. A number of meetings were held between senior officials, NFUS'' office bearers, and senior official with the aim of minimising any loss of support due to over declaration penalties. At a public level, SGRPID and NFUS worked together to put this objective into practice. Firstly, a series of public meetings to remind farmers about their obligations to claim only eligible land, secondly, SGRPID''s Chief Agricultural Officer provided articles for The Scottish Farmer on the same themes and thirdly, after consultation with NFUS, SGRPID issued a personal letter to all farmers likely to be involved with either the Single Farm Payment Scheme and / or the Less-Favoured Area Support Scheme, containing advice on how to avoid penalties.
- Asked by: Liam McArthur, MSP for Orkney, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 06 October 2010
-
Current Status:
Answered by Richard Lochhead on 28 October 2010
To ask the Scottish Executive how much support it expects to be withheld from claimants in 2010-11 as a result of penalties arising from an over declaration of eligible land under the Single Farm Payment and Less Favoured Area Support schemes.
Answer
The inspection cycle for 2010-11 is underway but not complete and the settlement of claims has not begun, so it is not possible to answer the question as asked.
- Asked by: Liam McArthur, MSP for Orkney, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 06 October 2010
-
Current Status:
Answered by Richard Lochhead on 28 October 2010
To ask the Scottish Executive what action it is taking to ensure that any penalties incurred by claimants resulting from an over declaration of eligible land under the Single Farm Payment and Less Favoured Area Support schemes are fair and proportionate.
Answer
Any reductions in the area claimed, as a result of declaring land over and above what would otherwise be considered as eligible are calculated on the basis of a physical measurement using modern mapping and measurement technologies. Each calculation of land area is also informed by an assessment of eligibility by a professional trained agricultural officer. This methodology ensures that the deduction is reasonable. With the issue of proportionality, the Scottish Government''s Rural Payments and Inspections Directorate does not have any discretion to vary the level of penalties as these are set by the European Commission. The penalty regime, however, differentiates between over declarations committed intentionally, for which the level of penalty is severe, and those committed through oversight where the level of penalty varies according to the scale of the over claim and the eligible land found.
- Asked by: Liam McArthur, MSP for Orkney, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 06 October 2010
-
Current Status:
Answered by Richard Lochhead on 28 October 2010
To ask the Scottish Executive how many inquiries each Scottish Government Rural Payments and Inspections Directorate (SGRPID) office has received regarding Single Farm Payment and Less Favoured Area Support schemes land eligibility since January 2010 and how these figures compare with the number of inquiries received over the same period in 2009.
Answer
The Scottish Government''s Rural Payments and Inspections Directorate (SGRPID) receives numerous enquiries from its client group of c.21,000 farmers, and crofters. It does not keep, however, records of those enquiries as a matter of routine. It is not possible, therefore, to undertake the analysis required in order to answer this question.
- Asked by: Liam McArthur, MSP for Orkney, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 06 October 2010
-
Current Status:
Answered by Richard Lochhead on 28 October 2010
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it has compared the penalty regimes associated with an over declaration of eligible land under the Single Farm Payment and Less Favoured Area Support schemes and equivalent agricultural schemes in (a) Scotland, (b) England, (c) Wales, (d) Northern Ireland, (e) the Republic of Ireland and (f) other European Union member states and, if so, what the results were and, if not, whether it would consider undertaking such an exercise.
Answer
No comparison of penalty regimes associated with declaring land over and above what would otherwise be considered as eligible has been undertaken. Since the penalty regime is set in European legislation and, therefore, applicable to all member states, such a comparison would not be worthwhile.
- Asked by: Liam McArthur, MSP for Orkney, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 28 September 2010
-
Current Status:
Answered by Nicola Sturgeon on 21 October 2010
To ask the Scottish Executive how many complaints were registered against the air ambulance service in (a) 2007-08, (b) 2008-09, (c) 2009-10, broken down by NHS board area.
Answer
This information is not held centrally.
- Asked by: Liam McArthur, MSP for Orkney, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Friday, 01 October 2010
-
Current Status:
Answered by Stewart Stevenson on 21 October 2010
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answers to questions S3W-36066 and S3W-36059 by Stewart Stevenson on 30 September 2010, whether its “regular ongoing contact about ferry services in Scotland with a range of public bodies” included discussions with (a) Orkney Islands Council, (b) Shetland Islands Council and (c) Argyll and Bute Council regarding its plan to extend the Road Equivalent Tariff pilot on the Western Isles routes for a further 12 months before that decision was (i) taken and (ii) announced.
Answer
Orkney Islands Council, Shetland Islands Council and Argyll and Bute Council have, through regular road equivalent tariff (RET) stakeholder meetings, and the recent Scottish ferries review meetings, been kept fully involved and informed during all stages of the RET pilot.
t
- Asked by: Liam McArthur, MSP for Orkney, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 23 September 2010
-
Current Status:
Answered by Alex Neil on 4 October 2010
To ask the Scottish Executive how many applications there have been for Stage Four measures under the Energy Assistance Package; how many (a) were rejected, (b) were withdrawn and (c) are under consideration; for how many (i) the improvement work has been completed, (ii) the improvement work is underway, (iii) surveys have been undertaken but the improvement work has yet to start, (iv) surveys have yet to start, and what the average time is from the submission of an application to the completion of the improvement work, broken down by local authority area.
Answer
15,066 applications were referred to Stage Four of the Energy Assistance Package in the financial year 2009-10. Of these, five were duplicates, leaving 15,061. Of these 15,061 applications, by the end of August 2010:
a. 2,799 had been rejected because they were not eligible and a further 696 were cancelled before the initial screening process because the managing agent was unable to reach the customer, total 3,495;
b. 2,160 had been withdrawn, and
c. None were still under consideration.
i. 7,910 had received installations;
ii. 1,031 had work underway;
iii. 465 have had surveys undertaken but improvement work yet to start;
iv. None still had surveys yet to start.
The average time from referral to Stage 4 to installation was 68 days. An analysis by local authority area is given in the following table:
Energy Assistance Package: 2009-10 Stage 4 Applications Received and Processed by Local Authority Area: Status at End August 2010
| | Applications | a. Rejected | b. Withdrawn | Stage 4 Measures | Average Delivery Time (Working Days) |
| i. Installed | ii. Under-way | iii. Surveyed, Work Yet to Start |
| Aberdeen City | 349 | 87 | 38 | 198 | 17 | 9 | 75 |
| Aberdeenshire | 563 | 106 | 77 | 308 | 52 | 20 | 89 |
| Angus | 390 | 82 | 67 | 207 | 21 | 13 | 69 |
| Argyll and Bute | 404 | 70 | 81 | 198 | 38 | 17 | 96 |
| Clackmannanshire | 94 | 22 | 7 | 62 | 3 | 0 | 64 |
| Dumfries and Galloway | 713 | 117 | 154 | 367 | 50 | 25 | 93 |
| Dundee City | 506 | 114 | 55 | 312 | 16 | 9 | 55 |
| East Ayrshire | 240 | 53 | 34 | 145 | 4 | 4 | 58 |
| East Dunbartonshire | 302 | 90 | 52 | 156 | 2 | 2 | 54 |
| East Lothian | 222 | 46 | 37 | 121 | 12 | 6 | 65 |
| East Renfrewshire | 272 | 70 | 47 | 145 | 5 | 5 | 57 |
| Edinburgh, City of | 920 | 248 | 155 | 466 | 34 | 17 | 61 |
| Eilean Siar | 1,045 | 188 | 172 | 294 | 278 | 113 | 90 |
| Falkirk | 375 | 106 | 35 | 220 | 8 | 6 | 64 |
| Fife | 1,062 | 257 | 146 | 589 | 46 | 24 | 66 |
| Glasgow City | 1,209 | 356 | 153 | 667 | 22 | 11 | 55 |
| Highland | 1,262 | 267 | 175 | 565 | 185 | 70 | 88 |
| Inverclyde | 209 | 58 | 30 | 112 | 9 | 0 | 60 |
| Midlothian | 188 | 42 | 20 | 112 | 4 | 10 | 53 |
| Moray | 288 | 49 | 42 | 176 | 18 | 3 | 82 |
| North Ayrshire | 429 | 102 | 50 | 254 | 11 | 12 | 65 |
| North Lanarkshire | 692 | 166 | 65 | 442 | 9 | 10 | 53 |
| Orkney Islands | 141 | 26 | 28 | 42 | 39 | 6 | 82 |
| Perth and Kinross | 434 | 81 | 57 | 247 | 30 | 19 | 72 |
| Renfrewshire | 343 | 89 | 40 | 203 | 5 | 6 | 56 |
| Scottish Borders | 343 | 61 | 59 | 191 | 24 | 8 | 83 |
| Shetland Islands | 55 | 10 | 8 | 10 | 19 | 8 | 152 |
| South Ayrshire | 322 | 61 | 65 | 178 | 10 | 8 | 64 |
| South Lanarkshire | 771 | 208 | 90 | 434 | 33 | 6 | 60 |
| Stirling | 466 | 124 | 64 | 244 | 19 | 15 | 59 |
| West Dunbartonshire | 224 | 72 | 25 | 123 | 2 | 2 | 59 |
| West Lothian | 228 | 67 | 32 | 122 | 6 | 1 | 59 |
| Scotland | 15,061 | 3,495 | 2,160 | 7,910 | 1,031 | 465 | 68 |
- Asked by: Liam McArthur, MSP for Orkney, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Friday, 03 September 2010
-
Current Status:
Answered by Stewart Stevenson on 30 September 2010
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it will detail the outcome of the assessment undertaken of the legality of an extension to the pilot of Road Equivalent Tariff fares on the ferry services to the Western Isles beyond spring 2011 before a decision was made to extent the pilot by one year.
Answer
It is the Scottish Government''s view that the Road Equivalent Tariff (RET) scheme is compliant with EU law. This view is not affected by our recent decision to extend the RET pilot to spring 2012.
- Asked by: Liam McArthur, MSP for Orkney, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Friday, 03 September 2010
-
Current Status:
Answered by Stewart Stevenson on 30 September 2010
To ask the Scottish Executive when it began its consideration of an extension to the pilot of Road Equivalent Tariff fares on the ferry services to the Western Isles beyond spring 2011.
Answer
It would have been premature to end the pilot before the final evaluation study had been completed and fully considered. This decision was taken within the context of ongoing consultation and engagement as set out in the answer to question S3W-36059 on 30 September 2010.
All answers to written parliamentary questions are available on the Parliament''s website, the search facility for which can be found at:
http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/Apps2/Business/PQA/Default.aspx.