- Asked by: Patrick Harvie, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 21 July 2009
-
Current Status:
Answered by Stewart Stevenson on 13 August 2009
To ask the Scottish Executive what information Scottish ministers provided or made available to (a) objectors and (b) the public relating to the potential impact of the proposed Aberdeen Western Peripheral Route on wildlife habitats, designated areas and protected species.
Answer
Information relating to the potential impact of the proposed Aberdeen Western Peripheral Route on wildlife habitats, designated areas and protected species was made available in a number of reports, including those listed below.
Aberdeen Western Peripheral Route, Environmental Statement 2007:
http://awpr.co.uk/document_archive.asp?command=OpenFolder&folder=Environmental+Statement%5C&file=September+2007.
Aberdeen Western Peripheral Route, Report to Inform Appropriate Assessment for the River Dee SAC:
http://www.awpr-pli.org/document_library.asp?command=OpenFolder&folder=Documents%5CTransport+Scotland+Documents%5C&file=TS081.
Aberdeen Western Peripheral Route, Environmental Statement 2007 Additional Survey Report: Breeding Birds:
http://www.awpr-pli.org/downloads/Documents/Transport%20Scotland%20Documents/TS074.pdf.
Aberdeen Western Peripheral Route, Environmental Statement 2007 Additional Survey Report: Bats:
http://www.awpr-pli.org/downloads/Documents/Transport%20Scotland%20Documents/TS075.pdf.
Aberdeen Western Peripheral Route, Correspondence between Promoters and Consultees in relation to the Environmental Statement:
http://www.awpr-pli.org/downloads/Documents/Transport%20Scotland%20Documents/TS072.PDF.
The public local inquiry considered evidence in relation to the environmental aspects of the proposed scheme, including evidence in relation to matters included in the Environmental Statement produced in accordance with the Environmental Impact Assessment (Scotland) Regulations 1999, as amended. The Scottish ministers are currently considering the public local inquiry reporters findings and recommendations prior to deciding whether or not to proceed with the scheme.
- Asked by: Patrick Harvie, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 21 July 2009
-
Current Status:
Answered by Stewart Stevenson on 13 August 2009
To ask the Scottish Executive whether the level and type of information provided or made available to the public by Scottish ministers on the need in principle for the Aberdeen Western Peripheral Route were consistent with the requirements of the Aarhus Convention.
Answer
Yes.
- Asked by: Patrick Harvie, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 21 July 2009
-
Current Status:
Answered by Stewart Stevenson on 13 August 2009
To ask the Scottish Executive on what information Scottish ministers based their decision on the route for the proposed Aberdeen Western Peripheral Route.
Answer
The decision on the route for the proposed Aberdeen Western Peripheral Route was based on the information noted in reports listed below:
Aberdeen Western Peripheral Route, Development of Preferred Route Initial Assessment Stage Report.
Aberdeen Western Peripheral Route, Development of Preferred Route Final Assessment Stage Report.
Aberdeen Western Peripheral Route, Project Development 2005-06 Consolidation Assessment Report.
These reports were made available from autumn 2006 on the Aberdeen Western Peripheral Route website at:
http://www.awpr.co.uk/document_archive.asp?command=OpenFolder&folder=&file=Documents+and+Reports.
The reports also identify procedures and criteria adopted to determine the route for the proposed Aberdeen Western Peripheral Route. Further information was provided in the form of evidence to the recent public local inquiry, in the precognitions of Mr A Graham, Mr J Wilson, Mr R Galbraith and Dr S Henderson. These, and all other precognitions lodged during the inquiry, are available from the inquiry website at:
http://www.awpr-pli.org/document_library.asp?command=OpenFolder&folder=Precognitions%5CFull+Precognitions%5C&file=Transport+Scotland.
- Asked by: Patrick Harvie, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 21 July 2009
-
Current Status:
Answered by Stewart Stevenson on 13 August 2009
To ask the Scottish Executive what alternative routes were considered for the proposed Aberdeen Western Peripheral Route to ensure that the Dee Special Area of Conservation would not be adversely affected.
Answer
The Habitats Directive was implemented in the UK by the Conservation (Natural Habitats etc) Regulations 1994 as amended. Regulation 48(1) and (2) make it clear that the point at which the competent authority requires to make an appropriate assessment, if necessary, is before deciding to undertake or give any consent, permission or other authorisation for a project. It is clear from Regulation 48(2) that it is as part of the statutory consent process that this procedure must be followed through.
In terms of Article (6)(3) of the Habitats Directive, the principal issue to be considered in the appropriate assessment is whether or not the project in question will adversely affect the integrity of the site. Only if a negative conclusion is reached in relation to that test, or there is uncertainty as to whether or not there would be an adverse effect on the integrity of the site, is it necessary to proceed to the considerations in Article 6(4). It is in that context that guidance from the European Commission suggests that it is necessary to consider whether the option put forward for approval is the least damaging for habitats, species and the integrity of the site and that no other feasible alternative exists that would not affect the integrity of the site.
Transport Scotland''s consultants have prepared a report to inform an appropriate assessment (RIAA) of the impacts of the proposed Aberdeen Western Peripheral Route on the River Dee Special Area of Conservation (SAC). The approach taken to completion of the RIAA was set out in consultation with Scottish Natural Heritage. A copy of the RIAA is available from the inquiry website at:
http://www.awpr-pli.org/document_library.asp?command=OpenFolder&folder=Documents%5CTransport+Scotland+Documents%5C&file=TS081.
- Asked by: Patrick Harvie, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 21 July 2009
-
Current Status:
Answered by Stewart Stevenson on 13 August 2009
To ask the Scottish Executive what the reasons were for the choice of scope and remit of the public local inquiry into the proposed Aberdeen Western Peripheral Route.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer given to question S3W-13576 on 9 June 2008. All answers to written parliamentary questions are available on the Parliament''s website, the search facility for which can be found at:
http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/Apps2/Business/PQA/Default.aspx.
- Asked by: Patrick Harvie, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 21 July 2009
-
Current Status:
Answered by Stewart Stevenson on 13 August 2009
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it will (a) accept and (b) deliver in full the report and recommendations of the public local inquiry into the proposed Aberdeen Western Peripheral Route
Answer
The report of the public local inquiry into the proposed Aberdeen Western Peripheral Route was received by Scottish ministers on 30 June 2009.
The matter is currently under active consideration and a decision will be announced as soon as possible. It would not be appropriate at this stage to make any further comment which could be prejudicial to the eventual outcome.
- Asked by: Patrick Harvie, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 21 July 2009
-
Current Status:
Answered by Stewart Stevenson on 13 August 2009
To ask the Scottish Executive what criteria were used to decide on the limits of the scope and remit of the public local inquiry into the proposed Aberdeen Western Peripheral Route.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer given to question S3W-13576 on 9 June 2008. All answers to written parliamentary questions are available on the Parliament''s website, the search facility for which can be found at:
http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/Apps2/Business/PQA/Default.aspx.
- Asked by: Patrick Harvie, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 21 July 2009
-
Current Status:
Answered by Stewart Stevenson on 10 August 2009
To ask the Scottish Executive how many objectors to the Aberdeen Western Peripheral Route took part in the public local inquiry.
Answer
Thirty two different groups and individuals presented evidence to the Aberdeen Western Peripheral Route public local inquiry. This included, amongst others, action groups, community councils, councillors and building developers. In addition to this, 34 witnesses were called by these parties.
- Asked by: Patrick Harvie, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 21 July 2009
-
Current Status:
Answered by Stewart Stevenson on 10 August 2009
To ask the Scottish Executive how many objectors to the Aberdeen Western Peripheral Route were disallowed from taking part in the public local inquiry on the basis of the limits to its scope and remit.
Answer
The reporters did not disallow any party from taking part in the public local inquiry, but they did disallow parts of some parties evidence that did not fall within the remit of their appointment. In addition to this, some evidence was not taken into account because it was not submitted on time.
- Asked by: Patrick Harvie, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish Green Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 21 July 2009
-
Current Status:
Answered by Stewart Stevenson on 10 August 2009
To ask the Scottish Executive how many objections to the Aberdeen Western Peripheral Route were discounted on the basis of the limits to the scope and remit of the public local inquiry.
Answer
The reporters appointed to conduct the public local inquiry, and to report to Scottish ministers into objections received against the proposed Aberdeen Western Peripheral Route, have considered all objections passed to them by Transport Scotland. The remit of the inquiry was set by Scottish ministers and in preparing their report to ministers, the reporters have only reported on matters that fell within this remit. Approximately 10,000 letters of objection were considered by the reporters and many of these letters contained multiple objections. The reporters did not keep a record of the number of letters or objections that fell outwith the remit of the inquiry.