- Asked by: Murray Tosh, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 07 October 1999
-
Current Status:
Answered by Sarah Boyack on 25 October 1999
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it has any plans to de-trunk any part of the A68.
Answer
The Scottish Executive has no plans to detrunk any part of the A68.
- Asked by: Murray Tosh, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 22 September 1999
-
Current Status:
Answered by Sarah Boyack on 20 October 1999
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it plans to compensate Glasgow City Council and South Lanarkshire Council for the costs of Blight Notices served in respect of the proposed M74 extension.
Answer
This scheme is currently the responsibility of Glasgow and South Lanark Councils. The future status of this road is being considered in the Strategic Roads Review and The Executive can give no undertaking on future arrangements for blight costs until a decision has been taken as to whether this scheme should be taken forward. I shall report to the Scottish Parliament on the Strategic Roads Review soon.
- Asked by: Murray Tosh, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 05 October 1999
-
Current Status:
Answered by Henry McLeish on 13 October 1999
To ask the Scottish Executive what representations it has made to Her Majesty's Government with regard to the implications for Scotland of the proposed agreement between Her Majesty's Government and the Food and Drink Federation on energy reduction measures, as an alternative to energy taxation, and whether any such representations related to the Food and Drink Federation's request for a year's delay before entering into any such agreement.
Answer
The Scottish Executive is in regular contact with Her Majesty's Government across a range of matters, including those relating to the climate change levy and the agreements being negotiated on reductions in energy consumption by the Trade Associations representing the energy intensive sectors.
- Asked by: Murray Tosh, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 22 July 1999
-
Current Status:
Answered by Susan Deacon on 11 October 1999
To ask the Scottish Executive to specify the capital and revenue costs which will fall on water authorities, health boards and other public agencies in Scotland as a result of fluoridation and whether additional resources will be made available to each of the foregoing to offset these costs.
Answer
Health boards would be responsible for the capital costs incurred by water authorities in providing the treatment technology necessary to ensure that fluorides are added to water supplies accurately and safely and for revenue costs. Health boards promoting applications to fluoridate would also face the costs of consulting the public and any other administrative costs. Standing guidance indicates that central government will consider providing assistance to health boards of up to 60 per cent of the capital costs incurred in a fluoridation scheme.
- Asked by: Murray Tosh, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 30 September 1999
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jim Wallace on 7 October 1999
To ask the Scottish Executive whether Scottish Ministers will be able either to take final decisions themselves relating to the current review of Sheriff Court provision in Lothian and Borders, or to ensure that any final decisions take fully into account implications for the operational costs of all relevant agencies.
Answer
The review of Sheriff Court provision in Lothian and Borders is being undertaken by Sheriff Principal Gordon Nicholson who is consulting interested parties on a number of proposals. Any recommendations from the review which affect Court boundaries will be submitted to Scottish Ministers who will take account of all relevant considerations before deciding on a course of action. Any changes in provision of Courts would have to be set out in a Statutory Instrument requiring the approval of the Parliament.
- Asked by: Murray Tosh, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 29 September 1999
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jim Wallace on 7 October 1999
To ask the Scottish Executive whether Scottish Ministers will be able either to take final decisions themselves relating to the current review of Sheriff Court provision in Lothian and Borders, or to ensure that any final decisions take fully into account implications for the operational costs of all relevant agencies.
Answer
The review of Sheriff Court provision in Lothian and Borders is being undertaken by Sheriff Principal Gordon Nicholson who is consulting interested parties on a number of proposals. Any recommendations from the review which affect Court boundaries will be submitted to Scottish Ministers who will take account of all relevant considerations before deciding on a course of action. Any changes in provision of Courts would have to be set out in a Statutory Instrument requiring the approval of the Parliament.
- Asked by: Murray Tosh, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 22 July 1999
-
Current Status:
Answered by Susan Deacon on 28 September 1999
To ask the Scottish Executive to specify the estimated cost of establishing a fluoridation system in Scotland and the estimated annual cost of operating such a system.
Answer
Initial estimates by the Scottish water authorities suggest that fluoridating the water supplies where it is possible to do so, serving the majority of the population, would imply capital expenditure in the order of £29 million and annual running costs of £4 million. It is not practical technically to fluoridate some 15 per cent of public water supplies in Scotland. Some 2-3 per cent of the population are served by private water supplies. These costs might vary considerably if fluoridation schemes were introduced at local level at different times. The costs of consulting the public, for example, by local opinion polls, prior to the introduction of any fluoridation scheme will be determined once the arrangements for public consultation have been agreed.
- Asked by: Murray Tosh, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 07 September 1999
-
Current Status:
Answered by Sarah Boyack on 27 September 1999
To ask the Scottish Executive to provide an estimate of the capital value of the trunk road and motorway network in Scotland.
Answer
At 1 April 1999 the capital value of the trunk road and motorway network in Scotland was estimated as being £7.9bn.
- Asked by: Murray Tosh, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 07 September 1999
-
Current Status:
Answered by Sarah Boyack on 27 September 1999
To ask the Scottish Executive what money has been paid from motoring penalties collected in Scotland to Her Majesty's Treasury in each of the last three years; what plans it has to secure hypothecation of such money for road and other specific projects in Scotland, and what proportion of income from motoring penalties it believes it can secure for such projects in future years.
Answer
Revenue from all motoring penalties in Scotland was £10.897 million in 1996-97, £11.660 million in 1997-98 and £12.306 million in 1998-99. These amounts accrued to the Exchequer.Consideration is being given to the possibility of using fine income to fund additional speed cameras. In addition, local authorities in Scotland can seek approval from the Scottish Ministers to introduce decriminalised parking schemes. These enable a local authority to administer its own parking penalty scheme and to retain the revenue from the penalties to finance its parking enforcement procedures. The legislation underpinning these powers requires that the revenue from on-street parking penalties must be used for traffic or transport related projects and cannot be used for any other purpose
- Asked by: Murray Tosh, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 07 September 1999
-
Current Status:
Answered by Sarah Boyack on 27 September 1999
To ask the Scottish Executive what works are programmed for the Kingston Bridge on the M8, what plans it has to repair the bridge, and when it expects the bridge to be restored to full operation.
Answer
A major contract to address Kingston Bridge's structural problems is in progress. The works include strengthening of the centre and side spans of the deck, demolition and reconstruction of the main supports, and restoring the articulation of the bridge. This contract is expected to be completed in autumn 2000.
Further works to improve the approach viaducts and ramps are planned. These works will take a number of years to complete depending on the availability of funds.Until the programme for the remaining works has been finalised we cannot say when the current traffic restrictions will be removed and the bridge restored to full operation.