Chamber and committees

Questions and answers

Parliamentary questions can be asked by any MSP to the Scottish Government or the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body. The questions provide a means for MSPs to get factual and statistical information.

Written questions must be answered within 10 working days (20 working days during recess)
Other questions such as Topical, Portfolio, General and First Minister's Question Times are taken in the Chamber

Urgent Questions aren't included in the Question and Answers search. There is a SPICe fact sheet listing Urgent and emergency questions.

Find out more about parliamentary questions

Filter your results Hide all filters

Displaying 1976 questions Show Answers

Order by |

Question reference: S6O-04951

Asked by: Kenneth Gibson, MSP for Cunninghame North, Scottish National Party
Date lodged: Wednesday, 10 September 2025
Current Status: Taken in the Chamber on 18 September 2025

To ask the Scottish Government what recent discussions it has had with ScotRail regarding an increase to the service frequency on the Largs to Glasgow Central route.

Question reference: S6T-02625

Asked by: Kenneth Gibson, MSP for Cunninghame North, Scottish National Party
Date lodged: Monday, 01 September 2025
Current Status: Taken in the Chamber on 2 September 2025

To ask the Scottish Government, in light of the Cabinet Secretary for Transport's announcement on 19 February 2025, whether it will provide an update on its discussions with Peel Ports regarding bringing Ardrossan harbour into public ownership.

Question reference: S6O-04874

Asked by: Kenneth Gibson, MSP for Cunninghame North, Scottish National Party
Date lodged: Wednesday, 27 August 2025
Current Status: Taken in the Chamber on 3 September 2025

To ask the Scottish Government what assessment it has made of the impact on the public finances of working age economic inactivity.

Question reference: S6W-39517

Asked by: Kenneth Gibson, MSP for Cunninghame North, Scottish National Party
Date lodged: Wednesday, 23 July 2025
Current Status: Answered by Jenni Minto on 18 August 2025

To ask the Scottish Government what it estimates the annual cost to the Scottish economy was as a result of lost productivity caused by smoking-related early deaths or illness in (a) 2022-23, (b) 2023-24 and (c) 2024-25.

Question reference: S6W-39516

Asked by: Kenneth Gibson, MSP for Cunninghame North, Scottish National Party
Date lodged: Wednesday, 23 July 2025
Current Status: Answered by Jenni Minto on 18 August 2025

Scotland level information on costs for each of the years requested is not available. However, Action on Smoking and Health (ASH) commissioned Landman Economics to provide updated analysis on costs of smoking which was published in January 2025. This analysis estimates the UK wide costs of smoking on Social Care in 2024 were £16.541 billion. The Scottish Government undertook additional analysis of this data for the Public Service Reform Strategy. This estimated a public spending cost of smoking to Scotland, including wider costs to the health service, social care and responding to fire-related incidents, of £1.56bn in 2024, projected to reach £2.5 billion by 2035-36 unless further action is taken.

Question reference: S6W-39515

Asked by: Kenneth Gibson, MSP for Cunninghame North, Scottish National Party
Date lodged: Wednesday, 23 July 2025
Current Status: Answered by Jenni Minto on 18 August 2025

Scotland level information on costs for each of the years requested is not available. However, Action on Smoking (ASH) commissioned Landman Economics to provide updated analysis on costs of smoking which was published in January 2025. This estimated the UK wide costs of smoking on the NHS in 2024 were £2.161 billion. The Scottish Government undertook additional analysis of this data for the Public Service Reform Strategy. This estimated a public spending cost of smoking to Scotland, including wider costs to the health service, social care and responding to fire-related incidents, of £1.56bn in 2024, projected to reach £2.5 billion by 2035/36 unless further action is taken.

Question reference: S6W-39339

Asked by: Kenneth Gibson, MSP for Cunninghame North, Scottish National Party
Date lodged: Tuesday, 15 July 2025
Current Status: Answered by Ivan McKee on 8 August 2025

To ask the Scottish Government what information it holds on how much was spent by (a) the NHS, (b) local authorities and (c) the entire Scottish public sector on Microsoft 365 licences in the most recent year for which figures are available.

Scottish Government does not hold centralised figures for Microsoft 365 license spend across the entire public sector, however, information is held on spend through the Scottish Government Microsoft Enterprise Agreement and spend on all Microsoft products through the Software Value Added Reseller Services (SVARS) framework.

iTECS can confirm that the Scottish Government spent a total of £6,514,529.39 on Microsoft 365 licences in the most recent financial year, through the Microsoft Enterprise Agreement. This figure includes all licences held under the SCOTS Connect tenancy, which supports both SG Core and Non-Core customers. It is important to note that this cost includes licences for 55 SCOTS Connect customers on the network, which partially covers some of the wider public sector in Scotland. However, iTECS does not collate or hold centralised figures for Microsoft 365 licence expenditure by the NHS, local authorities, or the Scottish public sector as a whole.

Breakdown of Costs by Licence Type

Tenancy	Description	Cost (£)
SCOTSConnect	Predominantly M365 E3 licencing for SG Core and Non-Core users includes licences such as Power BI, Power Automate, Teams Phone, etc. which are recharged to business areas as a SCOTS Service	£6,284,281.43
SCOTS Connect SCE	Cloud products including SQL and Data Centre	£217,226.88
ScotsConnectTravel	M365 E3 and E5 for SCOTS Travel (Cyber)	£8,566.85
ScotsConnectTest	Minimal test licences (E1, E3, F3, E5, etc.)	£3,610.38
ScotsConnectPreProd	Minimal pre-production licences	£843.85
Total		£6,514,529.39

As of 2 April 2025, there were 24,178 users across SG Core (52.1%) and Non-Core (47.9%), with the M365 E3 licence cost split as follows:

SG Core: £3,188,685.03
Non-Core: £2,928,590.75

SVARS Microsoft Spend

The SVARS Framework provides Scottish public sector and third sector bodies with a compliant procurement route to purchase commercial off the shelf (COTS) software and associated services.

Information is held on spend on Microsoft 365 products via the SVARS frameworks, however, it should be noted that the information provided in the following table does not relate to sectoral spend out with our current framework agreements and does not include spend through other procurement routes or maverick spend as this information is not held by Scottish Government.

The SVARS data held on spend per sector for 2024-2025 FY is:

Sector	Spend (£)
NHS	£36,789,550.80
Local Authority	£6,017,028.85
Other Public Sector	£6,240,604.80
Total	£49,047,184.45

Colleagues in the Scottish Government are currently working on a programme which will capture new digital change spend information across Scottish Government core and the Executive Agencies. Future phases of this programme will implement a broader approach which will allow oversight of business-as-usual digital spend, which Microsoft licences would fall within, potentially offering greater oversight across other public sector organisations as well as Scottish Government.

Question reference: S6W-39373

Asked by: Kenneth Gibson, MSP for Cunninghame North, Scottish National Party
Date lodged: Tuesday, 15 July 2025
Current Status: Answered by Claire Baker (on behalf of the SPCB) on 31 July 2025

To ask the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body how much it spent on Microsoft 365 licences in the most recent year for which figures are available.

Question reference: S6W-38730

Asked by: Kenneth Gibson, MSP for Cunninghame North, Scottish National Party
Date lodged: Monday, 16 June 2025
Current Status: Initiated by the Scottish Government. Answered by Kate Forbes on 17 June 2025

To ask the Scottish Government whether it will provide an update on the commitment to the Finance and Public Administration Committee on the publication of reports on longer-term insights.

Today, we are publishing the findings from the Scottish Government’s Horizon Scanning project. The Future Trends for Scotland report and the accompanying Trend pack describe the 60 trends likely to be important to Scotland over the next 10 to 20 years. This publication does not cover potential policy or strategy implications and is not a statement of government policy or intention, rather it is about providing open analysis to spark reflection and guide decisions in a complex interconnected world.

Publishing the findings from the project fulfils the commitment made to the Finance and Public Administration Committee, will contribute to a wider debate about trends affecting Scotland in the future and will support other organisations and our partners in their own work in planning for the opportunities and plausible future risks.

Question reference: S6W-38267

Asked by: Kenneth Gibson, MSP for Cunninghame North, Scottish National Party
Date lodged: Wednesday, 04 June 2025
Current Status: Answered by Jenni Minto on 17 June 2025

To ask the Scottish Government what assessment it has made of the adequacy of current financial incentives for home dialysis and whether there has been any variation in adoption across NHS boards.

The primary driver for introducing a national policy was to achieve a level of consistency and resolve the situation where some NHS Boards were already reimbursing the electricity costs associated with home dialysis, some partially reimbursing and others making no reimbursement at all. The Scotland-wide policy allows for Boards to determine reimbursement rates for home dialysis whilst recommending the standard UK Kidney Association (UKKA) calculator as a basis.

A review of implementation of the national policy found that all Boards had reimbursement policies for eligible patients. The policy requests that Boards proactively identify patients eligible for reimbursement but does not mandate how Boards may manage the reimbursement process; this is a local decision for each Board.