- Asked by: Keith Brown, MSP for Ochil, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 20 June 2008
-
Current Status:
Answered by Kenny MacAskill on 15 July 2008
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it considers historical re-enactment to constitute a form of theatre in terms of the 2007 Custodial Sentences and Weapons (Scotland) Act 2007.
Answer
Section 61 of the Custodial Sentences and Weapons (Scotland) Act 2007 enables the Scottish ministers to prohibit the manufacture, sale, hire, etc. of swords, and to provide defences for religious, cultural and sporting purposes. No such prohibitions or defences are yet in place. The policy memorandum for the bill made it clear that use relating to historical re-enactment will be recognised as one of the defences. It is not relevant to these provisions whether historical re-enactment is a form of theatre.
However, section 60 of the Custodial Sentences and Weapons (Scotland) Act 2007 does refer to theatre, and will provide a new defence in section 141 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988 relating to the manufacture, sale, hire, etc. of offensive weapons for the purposes of theatrical performances. Those defences will apply to all offences weapons covered by section 141.
The Custodial Sentences and Weapons (Scotland) Act 2007 does not change the law on the carrying of swords or other weapons in public. It is an offence under section 49 of the Criminal Law (Consolidation) (Scotland) Act 1995 to have any article which has a blade or is sharply pointed in a public place without good reason or lawful authority. Any individual instance will be a matter for the police, and ultimately the courts, but having a sword for the purpose of historical re-enactment would generally appear to be a good reason. Under section 47 of the same act it is an offence to carry an offensive weapon, which might for example be an axe or pike. Section 47 also includes a defence of “reasonable excuse” which has generally been seen to include historical re-enactment.
- Asked by: Keith Brown, MSP for Ochil, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 20 June 2008
-
Current Status:
Answered by Kenny MacAskill on 15 July 2008
To ask the Scottish Executive what orders are in force under the provisions of the Criminal Justice Act 1988, inserted by section 46 of the Custodial Sentences and Weapons (Scotland) Act 2007, in particular section 141ZA(3)(a) which allows Scottish Ministers to provide for defences against prosecution on religious, cultural, sporting or other grounds.
Answer
Section 61 of the Custodial Sentences and Weapons (Scotland) Act 2007 inserts new section 141ZA into the Criminal Justice Act 1988. It is not yet in force and no orders have been made.
- Asked by: Keith Brown, MSP for Ochil, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 20 June 2008
-
Current Status:
Answered by Kenny MacAskill on 15 July 2008
To ask the Scottish Executive whether Scottish Ministers have the powers to provide for defences against prosecution on religious, cultural, sporting or other grounds for possession, sale or other conduct in relation to weapons which are not swords but are nonetheless covered by the Criminal Justice Act 1988 (as amended).
Answer
Section 141 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988 deals with the manufacture, sale, hire, lending and giving of specified offensive weapons. It covers possession only where possession is for the purposes of sale or hire. Section 141 already provides limited defences relating to museums and galleries, and lending by such institutions for cultural, artistic or educational purposes.
Section 60 of the Custodial Sentences and Weapons (Scotland) Act 2007 contains amendments to section 141 including new subsections (11A) to (11E) which will provide defences relating to theatre, film and television. It also provides a power in new subsection (11G) for the Scottish ministers to vary the application of section 141 in relation to any description of weapon. That power could be used, if desired, to provide further defences on cultural, sporting or other grounds.
The weapons to which section 141 of the 1998 act applies are set out in the Criminal Justice Act 1988 (Offensive Weapons) (Scotland) Order 2005 and include knuckledusters, swordsticks and butterfly knives. That Order excludes antique weapons.
Section 47 of the Criminal Law (Consolidation)(Scotland) Act 1995 places prohibitions on the carrying of offensive weapons but allows the defence of having lawful authority or good reason.
- Asked by: Keith Brown, MSP for Ochil, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 06 June 2008
-
Current Status:
Answered by Stewart Stevenson on 20 June 2008
To ask the Scottish Executive whether the rail line between Kincardine and Dunfermline that has been used for freight to Longannet Power Station currently meets safety and other specifications for passenger travel.
Answer
The existing route between Kincardine and Dunfermline via Charleston Junction does not meet current standards to operate a regular passenger rail service.
- Asked by: Keith Brown, MSP for Ochil, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 10 June 2008
-
Current Status:
Answered by Fergus Ewing on 19 June 2008
To ask the Scottish Executive whether private homes providing bed and breakfast accommodation to the public qualify as domestic premises under the Fire (Scotland) Act 2005 and not relevant premises under the provisions of the Fire Safety (Scotland) Regulations 2006 which include houses of multiple occupancy and care homes but not homes offering bed and breakfast accommodation.
Answer
The answer requires interpretation of legislation which ultimately is a matter for the courts. However, the drafting intention was for the commercial or public areas of premises which are used for both domestic and non-domestic purposes to fall within the scope of “relevant premises” under the Fire (Scotland) Act 2005 and the Fire Safety (Scotland) Regulations 2006. Private areas are regarded as domestic premises and are therefore largely exempt.
- Asked by: Keith Brown, MSP for Ochil, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 10 June 2008
-
Current Status:
Answered by Stewart Stevenson on 18 June 2008
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it has plans to designate the remainder of the A977 as a trunk road.
Answer
We have no current plans to designate the A977 as a trunk road.
- Asked by: Keith Brown, MSP for Ochil, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 06 June 2008
-
Current Status:
Answered by Stewart Stevenson on 18 June 2008
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it considers that the concerns about potential traffic through the west Fife villages, as outlined in the members’ business debate on 15 May 2008 on the Upper Forth Crossing (Official Report c. 8750), could be reduced by the alternative of a passenger rail service running through western Fife.
Answer
Rail services in this area will be examined as part of the Strategic Transport Projects Review (STPR) which is expected to report to ministers in the summer.
- Asked by: Keith Brown, MSP for Ochil, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 06 June 2008
-
Current Status:
Answered by Stewart Stevenson on 18 June 2008
To ask the Scottish Executive whether giving the residents of western Fife direct access by rail to Stirling and its university could increase educational opportunities and contribute to the objective of making Scotland smarter.
Answer
It is not possible to determine what impact a direct rail link between western Fife and Stirling would have on educational opportunities.
Our rail policy document, Scotland’s Railways, sets out Scottish ministers aspirations for the rail network in Scotland. This focuses on achieving three key strategic outcomes of improving journey times and connections, reducing emissions and improving quality, accessibility and affordability.
- Asked by: Keith Brown, MSP for Ochil, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 06 June 2008
-
Current Status:
Answered by Stewart Stevenson on 18 June 2008
To ask the Scottish Executive how safety and other specifications for railways vary between passenger and freight use.
Answer
Railway safety is a matter which is reserved to the UK Government.
There is no significant difference in the safety of either a passenger or freight railway as both come under the same safety approvals process and both modes run on a shared infrastructure throughout the vast majority of the network.
There are a few lines which are designated freight only and whilst the level of safety will be similar to the rest of the network, there may be some variance on technical specification. This variance reflects the different operational requirements required on a freight only line. For example passenger routes are designed to accommodate a higher density of traffic and higher speeds than a freight only line where there is usually a lesser requirement for either traffic density or speed.
Similarly passenger trains and freight trains have similar standards of safety but are built to the most appropriate technical standards that reflect their operational requirements. For example the weight, braking and suspension characteristics of a passenger train permit it to travel at higher speeds than a heavy freight train on a given piece of track.
- Asked by: Keith Brown, MSP for Ochil, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 06 June 2008
-
Current Status:
Answered by Stewart Stevenson on 18 June 2008
To ask the Scottish Executive whether the Strategic Transport Projects Review being conducted by Transport Scotland is considering the utility of additional stations on existing railway lines in addition to railway extensions.
Answer
Transport Scotland’s Strategic Transport Projects Review is considering a range of land-based transport interventions for the period 2012 to 2022, primarily road and rail based. This includes looking at the scope for further enhancements to the rail network to improve rail routes.