- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 04 November 1999
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 16 November 1999
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it will review the Agricultural Wages (Scotland) Order 1998 (SI 1998/46) to ensure that employment defined therein as "customary" is not excluded from protection.
Answer
Under the current Agricultural Wages (Scotland) Order (No 46) 1998, hill shepherds are paid at a weekly rate for all hours worked on the "customary" duties related to tending sheep. This rate includes a notional allowance for overtime. Actual overtime is paid only when a hill shepherd undertakes additional duties unrelated to sheep.
From 1 January 2000, hill shepherds will be paid a basic rate for the first 39 hours worked each week and an overtime rate for any additional hours regardless of the nature of the work undertaken. The reference to "customary" duties will disappear from the new Wages Order, but hill shepherds will have the same level of protection of pay and conditions of service as all other agricultural workers.The Scottish Agricultural Wages Board is responsible for making Wages Orders.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 02 November 1999
-
Current Status:
Answered by Sarah Boyack on 16 November 1999
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it will amend Schedule 7, paragraph 3 of the Local Government etc (Scotland) Act 1994 to permit the appointment of more than eleven members of water and sewerage authorities.
Answer
We have no plans to expand the membership of the Water Authorities beyond that currently allowed under the Act.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 02 November 1999
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jim Wallace on 16 November 1999
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it will review the rules governing the Victims Notification Scheme, in particular to permit notification to victims of the release of a person from custody where, although the person in custody was under 18 years of age at the time of the commitment of the crime, he or she is over 18 at the date of release.
Answer
The present Victim Notification Scheme would not prevent the victims of crime being notified of the release of a person from custody in these circumstances. The age of a person at the time of committing a crime would not in itself prevent the victim or, in the case of homicide, next of kin, being notified of that person's release from custody under the Victim Notification Scheme.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 12 July 1999
-
Current Status:
Answered by Henry McLeish on 15 November 1999
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it intends to review the structure of the Scottish Tourist Board with a view to increasing the emphasis on the marketing of Scotland.
Answer
We have no plans to do so. A Policy and Financial Management Review of the STB undertaken in 1998 found that all of the Board's current functions are necessary. These functions can be summarised as consumer and trade marketing, the development of the Area Tourist Board network and increasing the competitiveness of the industry. They are carried out in support of the objective that has been set for the Board, which is to help maximise the economic benefit of tourism to Scotland. Currently, over 60% of the Board's programme expenditure is incurred on consumer and trade marketing.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 29 October 1999
-
Current Status:
Answered by Henry McLeish on 12 November 1999
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it will consult with interested bodies as to how the Scottish University for Industry will add value to existing provision and how adequate performance measurement mechanisms will be instituted.
Answer
The Opportunity Scotland consultation paper of September 1998, the "Skills for Scotland" paper of March 1999 and the SUfI Development Plan of October 1998 all invited comment on our plans to establish the Scottish University for Industry by autumn 2000. Respondents overwhelmingly supported the establishment of the Scottish UfI.The Scottish UfI will be required to develop a number of success criteria which will be monitored and published. These will include targets such as the number of enquiries to the Scottish UfI helpline, the numbers taking up learning, the numbers progressing to further learning and the numbers completing learning. The Scottish UfI will be expected to publish an annual report and will be required to meet tough targets under a contractual agreement with the Scottish Executive for its funding.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 29 October 1999
-
Current Status:
Answered by Henry McLeish on 12 November 1999
To ask the Scottish Executive what the proposed salaries are of the Chairman and other Directors of the proposed Scottish University for Industry.
Answer
The Chief Executive post was advertised at circa £80,000, and the 4 Executive Directors at circa £50,000. Non Executive Directors of the Scottish UfI will not be paid. The question of an honorarium for the Chairman has yet to be decided.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 29 October 1999
-
Current Status:
Answered by Henry McLeish on 12 November 1999
To ask the Scottish Executive what the estimated annual operating costs are of the proposed Scottish University for Industry.
Answer
£5 million a year has been identified for the development and operating costs of the Scottish UfI for the period to 31 March 2002.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 29 October 1999
-
Current Status:
Answered by Henry McLeish on 12 November 1999
To ask the Scottish Executive what the sources of funding are of the #16.3 million costs for the proposed Scottish University for Industry.
Answer
£16.3m over 3 years has been allocated for the development of the Scottish UfI. £445,000 was allocated from the Windfall tax. The remainder was allocated from the Industry, Enterprise and Training budget of the Scottish Block. Funding for the development phase has been included in the Scottish Enterprise Grant in Aid allocation for 1999-2000.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 29 October 1999
-
Current Status:
Answered by Henry McLeish on 12 November 1999
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it will launch a marketing campaign aimed at small and medium si'e businesses to highlight the potential benefits of the Scottish University for Industry.
Answer
The Scottish University for Industry's branding and communications strategy will be central to stimulating the demand for learning. The Scottish UfI will develop an extensive communications strategy, targeted at a number of sectors including SMEs. The Scottish UfI will work closely with local enterprise companies, and with representative bodies, to ensure that small firms are aware of, and can benefit from, the Scottish University for Industry.
- Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 06 August 1999
-
Current Status:
Answered by Susan Deacon on 2 November 1999
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it will set up a body, similar to the MacFarlane Trust which exists to provide help to people in the haemophilia community who incur extra costs of living arising from HIV or AIDS as a result of having received contaminated blood products in the UK, to provide such support for those who have contracted hepatitis C in the same manner.
Answer
The circumstances surrounding those who may have contracted Hepatitis C through treatment with blood products are tragic. I have met the Haemophilia Society to hear their concerns at first hand and officials within my Department are making enquiries into the circumstances surrounding this issue. I will be better placed to consider whether any further action on the part of the Scottish Executive is indicated when these enquiries are completed.