Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Questions and answers

Parliamentary questions can be asked by any MSP to the Scottish Government or the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body. The questions provide a means for MSPs to get factual and statistical information.

  • Written questions must be answered within 10 working days (20 working days during recess)
  • Other questions such as Topical, Portfolio, General and First Minister's Question Times are taken in the Chamber

Urgent Questions aren't included in the Question and Answers search.  There is a SPICe fact sheet listing Urgent and emergency questions.

Find out more about parliamentary questions

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 31 January 2026
Answer status
Question type

Displaying 2853 questions Show Answers

Order by |

Question reference: S1W-24041

  • Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
  • Date lodged: Tuesday, 12 March 2002
  • Current Status: Answered by David Steel on 26 March 2002

To ask the Presiding Officer how much (a) has been spent and (b) is due to be paid in legal costs in connection with the attempted recovery of debt from Flour City International Inc in respect of the losses to the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body resulting from the insolvency of Flour City Architectural Metals (UK) Ltd and whether it is worthwhile incurring further expenditure on such recovery.

Question reference: S1W-24044

  • Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
  • Date lodged: Tuesday, 12 March 2002
  • Current Status: Answered by David Steel on 26 March 2002

To ask the Presiding Officer, further to his answer to question S1W-20309 on 7 December 2001, whether there should now be an inquiry into the circumstances surrounding the award of the contract for the MSP block wall cladding and window package of the Holyrood Project to Flour City Architectural Metals (UK) Ltd and how the losses currently estimated at #3.9 million arose.

Question reference: S1W-24043

  • Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
  • Date lodged: Tuesday, 12 March 2002
  • Current Status: Answered by David Steel on 26 March 2002

To ask the Presiding Officer what evidence was provided of the skills and abilities of Flour City Architectural Metals (UK) Ltd prior to the contract for the MSP block of the Holyrood Project being awarded to it.

Question reference: S1W-23534

  • Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
  • Date lodged: Tuesday, 26 February 2002
  • Current Status: Answered by Andy Kerr on 26 March 2002

To ask the Scottish Executive whether it has used its power of direction in respect of non-departmental government bodies and, if so, (a) when, (b) in respect of which bodies and (c) why it did so.

Question reference: S1W-24047

  • Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
  • Date lodged: Tuesday, 12 March 2002
  • Current Status: Answered by David Steel on 22 March 2002

To ask the Presiding Officer on what date the tenders were received for the contract for the MSP block wall cladding and windows; on what date the Holyrood Project Team considered the tenders; on what date a recommendation was made by the Holyrood Project Team to the Holyrood Progress Group on which company should be awarded the contract; what recommendation was made, and whether all documents in regard to this recommendation will be made publicly available.

Question reference: S1W-24046

  • Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
  • Date lodged: Tuesday, 12 March 2002
  • Current Status: Answered by David Steel on 22 March 2002

To ask the Presiding Officer on what date the initial contract between Flour City Architectural Metals (UK) Ltd and the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body became binding.

Question reference: S1W-24042

  • Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
  • Date lodged: Tuesday, 12 March 2002
  • Current Status: Answered by David Steel on 22 March 2002

To ask the Presiding Officer what the detailed breakdowns are of (a) the current estimate of #3.9 million losses to the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body resulting from the insolvency of Flour City Architectural Metals (UK) Ltd and (b) the previous estimate of losses of approximately #2 million.

Question reference: S1W-24052

  • Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
  • Date lodged: Tuesday, 12 March 2002
  • Current Status: Answered by David Steel on 22 March 2002

To ask the Presiding Officer whether the guarantee document granted by Flour City International Inc. in respect of the obligations of Flour City Architectural Metals (UK) Ltd was signed by John W Tang, President and Chief Executive Officer and Johnson K Fong, Chief Financial Officer and, if not, who signed the document on behalf of Flour City International Inc.

Question reference: S1W-24045

  • Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
  • Date lodged: Tuesday, 12 March 2002
  • Current Status: Answered by David Steel on 22 March 2002

To ask the Presiding Officer on what date the Parent Company Guarantee was (a) dated and (b) received in respect of the obligations of Flour City Architectural Metals (UK) Ltd.

Question reference: S1W-23311

  • Asked by: Fergus Ewing, MSP for Inverness East, Nairn and Lochaber, Scottish National Party
  • Date lodged: Wednesday, 20 February 2002
  • Current Status: Answered by Elaine Murray on 20 March 2002

To ask the Scottish Executive what the impact will be on the Lochaber economy of the decision to reject plans for the #4.5 million Castle Tioram project.