- Asked by: Des McNulty, MSP for Clydebank and Milngavie, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 02 August 2007
-
Current Status:
Answered by Stewart Stevenson on 23 August 2007
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S3W-1820 by Stewart Stevenson on 17 July 2007, whether ministers requested that the Tay Road Bridge Joint Bridge Board notify employees involved in toll collection prior to the announcement of the abolition of tolling and when employees were informed of ministers’ proposals.
Answer
Ministers did notrequest that the Tay Road Bridge Joint Board notify its employees prior to the announcementto abolish tolls. When employees were formally informed is a matter for theboard.
The proposals to abolishthe tolls were well publicised and contained in this Government’s pre-election documentA New Approach: Our First Steps.
- Asked by: Des McNulty, MSP for Clydebank and Milngavie, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 02 August 2007
-
Current Status:
Answered by Stewart Stevenson on 23 August 2007
To ask the Scottish Executive why Argyll and Bute Council was able to grant permission for the new linkspan at Dunoon as a variation to planning permission for the breakwater without the matter having to be referred to the Scottish Ministers.
Answer
I refer the memberto the question S3W-2904 on 23 August 2007. All answers to writtenparliamentary questions are available on the Parliament’s website, the search facilityfor which can be found at
http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/webapp/wa.search.
- Asked by: Des McNulty, MSP for Clydebank and Milngavie, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 02 August 2007
-
Current Status:
Answered by Stewart Stevenson on 23 August 2007
To ask the Scottish Executive whether there were any discussions with Western Ferries regarding proposals for the new linkspan at Dunoon.
Answer
I understand thatthere were discussions between Argyll and Bute Council and Western Ferries and CalMacregarding the new linkspan at Dunoon. These discussions focussed on ensuring thateach operator’s vessels could be accommodated at the new linkspan.
- Asked by: Des McNulty, MSP for Clydebank and Milngavie, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 02 August 2007
-
Current Status:
Answered by Stewart Stevenson on 23 August 2007
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S3W-1864 by Stewart Stevenson on 17 July 2007, when it will be in a position to confirm that it is satisfied with the (a) accuracy of the cost and (b) assessment of risk involved in dualling the A9.
Answer
As I stated in myanswer to question S3W-1864 on 17 July 2007, further scoping work is underway andthis will feed into the Strategic Transport Projects Review (STPR). The STPR willassess potential future investment options against the Government’s strategic objectivesand will be formally appraised in accordance with the Scottish Transport AppraisalGuidance process. The STPR is due to report in summer 2008.All answers to writtenparliamentary questions are available on the Parliament’s website, the search facilityfor which can be found at
http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/webapp/wa.search.
- Asked by: Des McNulty, MSP for Clydebank and Milngavie, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 02 August 2007
-
Current Status:
Answered by Stewart Stevenson on 23 August 2007
To ask the Scottish Executive what criteria were applied when the decision was made that the A720 Edinburgh City bypass east of the M8 extension and the A95 from Aviemore to Keith become part of the trunk road network in April 1996.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer to question S3W-2868 on 23 August 2007. All answers to written parliamentary questions are available on the Parliament''s website, the search facility for which can be found at
http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/webapp/wa.search.
- Asked by: Des McNulty, MSP for Clydebank and Milngavie, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 02 August 2007
-
Current Status:
Answered by Stewart Stevenson on 23 August 2007
To ask the Scottish Executive what criteria were applied when the decision was made that the A82 between the Glasgow City Council area boundary and the Erskine Bridge be transferred to local authority control in April 1996.
Answer
I refer the memberto the answer to question S3W-2868 on 23 August 2007. All answers to written parliamentary questions are availableon the Parliament’s website, the search facility for which can be found at
http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/webapp/wa.search.
- Asked by: Des McNulty, MSP for Clydebank and Milngavie, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 02 August 2007
-
Current Status:
Answered by Stewart Stevenson on 23 August 2007
To ask the Scottish Executive how many vehicles have used the A82 between the Glasgow City Council area boundary and the Erskine Bridge in each of the last five years.
Answer
The Scottish Executivecollects traffic data relating to the trunk road network for which it is responsiblethrough its agency Transport Scotland. The Executive does not hold centrally anytraffic flow information for the local road section of the A82 between Glasgow CityCouncil area boundary and the Erskine Bridge as this is the responsibility of West Dunbartonshire Council.
- Asked by: Des McNulty, MSP for Clydebank and Milngavie, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 02 August 2007
-
Current Status:
Answered by Stewart Stevenson on 23 August 2007
To ask the Scottish Executive why no separate planning permission was required for the new linkspan at Dunoon.
Answer
Argyll and Bute Councilwas responsible for the new breakwater and linkspan at Dunoon. Planning permissionfor the original breakwater scheme was granted through due process in consultationwith Scottish ministers. The linkspan was a late addition to the breakwater scheme.It is my understanding that the council took the view that the new linkspan was“permitted development”. Consequently, the council concluded that the addition of the new linkspan to the original breakwater scheme required neither separate planningpermission nor to be referred to Scottish ministers.
- Asked by: Des McNulty, MSP for Clydebank and Milngavie, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 02 August 2007
-
Current Status:
Answered by Stewart Stevenson on 23 August 2007
To ask the Scottish Executive what concerns have been previously highlighted by officials regarding value for money and conformity with guidance and regulations in relation to proposals for a ferry service linking Campbeltown to Ballycastle and whether there has been any significant change in circumstances.
Answer
This Executive isaware of the value for money issues regarding previous tender exercises for theCampbeltown to Ballycastle ferry service. I understand that Accountable OfficerDirections were issued by previous Ministers to Executive officials in 2002 and2005 because of officials’ concerns over value for money issues emerging from theeconomic appraisals undertaken at that time. In re-examining the case for reinstatingthe service a future appraisal will include value for money issues. Until such timeas that appraisal has been completed it would be premature to speculate on whetherthere has been any change in circumstances.
- Asked by: Des McNulty, MSP for Clydebank and Milngavie, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 15 August 2007
-
Current Status:
Answered by John Swinney on 22 August 2007
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S3W-2836 by John Swinney on 14 August 2007, why it does not plan to introduce legislation to implement its commitment to a local income tax until 2008-09.
Answer
It is my intentionto consult on our proposals for a fairer local tax before we introduce the necessarylegislation. That is why the legislation will not be introduced to Parliament until2008-09.