Skip to main content
Loading…

Chamber and committees

Questions and answers

Parliamentary questions can be asked by any MSP to the Scottish Government or the Scottish Parliamentary Corporate Body. The questions provide a means for MSPs to get factual and statistical information.

  • Written questions must be answered within 10 working days (20 working days during recess)
  • Other questions such as Topical, Portfolio, General and First Minister's Question Times are taken in the Chamber

Urgent Questions aren't included in the Question and Answers search.  There is a SPICe fact sheet listing Urgent and emergency questions.

Find out more about parliamentary questions

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 2 September 2025
Answer status
Question type

Displaying 3059 questions Show Answers

|

Question reference: S2W-23664

  • Asked by: Alex Neil, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
  • Date lodged: Wednesday, 01 March 2006
  • Current Status: Answered by Cathy Jamieson on 20 March 2006

To ask the Scottish Executive whether it will provide written proof that it was accepted by both parties to the settlement reached between Shirley McKie and the Scottish Executive that an “honest mistake” was made by individuals.

Question reference: S2W-23784

  • Asked by: Alex Neil, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
  • Date lodged: Friday, 03 March 2006
  • Current Status: Answered by Cathy Jamieson on 20 March 2006

To ask the Scottish Executive, in respect of the quashing of the conviction of David Asbury for the murder of Marion Ross in Kilmarnock in 1997 on the basis that the fingerprint evidence provided by the Scottish Criminal Record Office (SCRO) was unreliable, what action was taken by Scottish Ministers and the Lord Advocate to rectify the deficiencies in the fingerprint evidence being presented by the SCRO.

Question reference: S2W-23932

  • Asked by: Alex Neil, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
  • Date lodged: Tuesday, 07 March 2006
  • Current Status: Answered by Tavish Scott on 20 March 2006

To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S2W-21275 by Tavish Scott on 15 December 2005, who made the assessment of these costs.

Question reference: S2W-23937

  • Asked by: Alex Neil, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
  • Date lodged: Tuesday, 07 March 2006
  • Current Status: Answered by Allan Wilson on 20 March 2006

To ask the Scottish Executive what discussions it has had (a) with Her Majesty’s Government and (b) internally about the impact of potential exploration for sources of oil in the Atlantic Ocean.

Question reference: S2W-24087

  • Asked by: Alex Neil, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
  • Date lodged: Thursday, 09 March 2006
  • Current Status: Answered by Cathy Jamieson on 20 March 2006

To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S2W-23439 by Cathy Jamieson on 7 March 2006, when it expects that the court will have resolved the outstanding issues in relation to expenses in respect of the Shirley McKie case.

Question reference: S2W-24037

  • Asked by: Alex Neil, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
  • Date lodged: Thursday, 09 March 2006
  • Current Status: Answered by Colin Boyd on 20 March 2006

To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S2W-21577 by Cathy Jamieson on 22 December 2005, whether it is a responsibility of the public, press or politicians in Scotland to investigate crime and obtain evidence satisfactory to gain a conviction on the necessary judicial standard.

Question reference: S2W-24086

  • Asked by: Alex Neil, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
  • Date lodged: Thursday, 09 March 2006
  • Current Status: Answered by Cathy Jamieson on 20 March 2006

To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S2W-23439 by Cathy Jamieson on 7 March 2006, what the total costs to it have been to date of the legal representation which it sought in defence of the claim for compensation against it by Shirley McKie, broken down by year since 1997.

Question reference: S2W-23923

  • Asked by: Alex Neil, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
  • Date lodged: Monday, 06 March 2006
  • Current Status: Answered by Tavish Scott on 20 March 2006

To ask the Scottish Executive whether the cost of constructing the M80 through the identified Kelvin Valley route has been analysed by either an independent contractor or consultancy engineers.

Question reference: S2W-23921

  • Asked by: Alex Neil, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
  • Date lodged: Monday, 06 March 2006
  • Current Status: Answered by Tavish Scott on 20 March 2006

To ask the Scottish Executive why it prefers to upgrade the A80 on its on-line route to full motorway status, rather than constructing the M80 through the identified Kelvin Valley route.

Question reference: S2W-23922

  • Asked by: Alex Neil, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
  • Date lodged: Monday, 06 March 2006
  • Current Status: Answered by Tavish Scott on 20 March 2006

To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S2W-21275 by Tavish Scott on 15 December 2005, whether its estimate of the cost of constructing the M80 through the identified Kelvin Valley route takes account of the (a) good rock that would be excavated at various points on the route that could be crushed on site and utilised for hardcore and other purposes, thus saving purchase cost and aggregate tax, (b) utilisation of excavated material which could be used as filling, thereby saving on landfill transport and landfill tax, or (c) sale of large amounts of peat that could be excavated on the route which could be offset against the costs of construction.