- Asked by: Alex Neil, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 30 November 2005
-
Current Status:
Answered by Tavish Scott on 15 December 2005
To ask the Scottish Executive how it considers that Transport Scotland will improve the transport system.
Answer
As an executive agency of the Scottish Executive, Transport Scotland will have a clear remit focused on delivery of transport services and delivery, distinct from the wider role of a Government department and with the relevant skills and resources all in one place. It therefore has a visible and understandable role in the eyes of the public, whilst remaining accountable to Scottish ministers through the Chief Executive.
Transport Scotland will provide a centre of excellence with the right professional skills to deliver major transport projects in Scotland – making the most of the £3 billion capital programme for public transport and roads that we have committed over the next decade – as well as transport services which support integration – such as the national concessionary fares scheme, integrated ticketing and Real Time Information.
- Asked by: Alex Neil, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 30 November 2005
-
Current Status:
Answered by Cathy Jamieson on 15 December 2005
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S2W-20863 by Cathy Jamieson on 29 November 2005, what the distinction is between “failure to meet a particular contractual commitment” and “a breach of contract”.
Answer
I have asked Tony Cameron, Chief Executive of the Scottish Prison Service to respond. His response is as follows:
I refer the member to the answer to question S2W-21258 on 15 December 2005. All answers to written parliamentary questions are available on the Parliament's website, the search facility for which can be found at http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/webapp/wa.search.
- Asked by: Alex Neil, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 30 November 2005
-
Current Status:
Answered by Tavish Scott on 15 December 2005
To ask the Scottish Executive how it would manage any disruption to traffic caused in the event of the A80 from Stepps to Haggs through Cumbernauld being upgraded to full motorway status.
Answer
There will be a requirement on the contractor to maintain two lanes open in each direction on weekdays between 6am and 8pm. Similar arrangements have been used on other major projects on the A720, the A8, and the Auchenkilns upgrade.
- Asked by: Alex Neil, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 30 November 2005
-
Current Status:
Answered by Tavish Scott on 15 December 2005
To ask the Scottish Executive what projections it has made in respect of the volume of traffic per day on the A80 in (a) 10, (b) 20 and (c) 30 years time.
Answer
Projections have been made for the years 2010 and 2025 for the existing A80 (do minimum) and for the upgrading of the route to motorway status (with scheme). Volumes vary along the route. Typical values are shown in the following tables:
Do Minimum
| Route Section | 2010 Annual Average Daily Flow | 2025 Annual Average Daily Flow |
| Muirhead to Mollinsburn | 49,000 – 53,000 | 48,000 – 54,000 |
| Mollinsburn to Low Wood (Auchenkilns) | 86,000 | 89,000 |
| Auchenkilns to Castlecary | 87,000 – 91,000 | 93,000 – 99,000 |
With Scheme
| Route Section | 2010 Annual Average Daily Flow | 2025 Annual Average Daily Flow |
| Muirhead to Mollinsburn | 5,000 – 8,000 | 7,000 – 9,000 |
| Mollinsburn to Low Wood (Auchenkilns) | 123,000 | 134,000 |
| Auchenkilns to Castlecary | 104,000 – 107,000 | 111,000 |
- Asked by: Alex Neil, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 30 November 2005
-
Current Status:
Answered by Tavish Scott on 15 December 2005
To ask the Scottish Executive what plans it has to reduce the volume of traffic on the A80.
Answer
Should it be necessary to control the volume of traffic on the new route to preserve good traffic flow conditions, then measures will be considered to restrict access to the road at junctions and on the motorway upstream of the scheme to give priority to busses, HGV’s and multiple occupancy vehicles.
- Asked by: Alex Neil, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 30 November 2005
-
Current Status:
Answered by Tavish Scott on 15 December 2005
To ask the Scottish Executive what the strategic objectives of Transport Scotland are.
Answer
Transport Scotland’s purpose is to support the delivery of the Scottish Executive’s vision for sustainable transport in Scotland, making a real difference for people and businesses using the national rail and road systems. The specific aims, objectives and targets which Transport Scotland is tasked with delivering on behalf of ministers will be set out in the Corporate Plan 2006-08, which will be published in January 2006.
- Asked by: Alex Neil, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 07 December 2005
-
Current Status:
Answered by Lewis Macdonald on 15 December 2005
To ask the Scottish Executive what measures it is putting in place to prevent deaths from hypothermia this winter.
Answer
The Scottish Executive is implementing a number of measures including the central heating and Warm Deal Programmes, the Chief Medical Officer’s Wrap Up for Winter Campaign and the annual influenza campaign.
- Asked by: Alex Neil, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 05 December 2005
-
Current Status:
Answered by Malcolm Chisholm on 13 December 2005
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it is able to state its position on whether, had the way forward contained in a letter from William Rae to it on 12 December 2000 been acted upon, public money could have been saved.
Answer
The main allocations for the delivery of the Working for Families fund in local authorities are £10 million per annum for 2004-06 and £15 million per annum for 2006-08.
In addition to the main allocations, piloting, development and evaluation activities have also been carried out as shown in the following table:
| | 2003-04 | 2004-05 | 2005-06 |
| Pilot Projects | £565,000 | £0 | £0 |
| Rosemount Lifelong Learning Centre | £133,197 | £116,559 | £185,955 |
| Local Authority Project Development | £54,543 | £36,000 | £400,000 |
| Miscellaneous (including training events) | £9,285 | £9,780 | £3,708 |
| Evaluation | £48,085 | £38,989 | £77,978 |
- Asked by: Alex Neil, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 30 November 2005
-
Current Status:
Answered by Andy Kerr on 12 December 2005
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S2W-20285 by Mr Andy Kerr on 10 November 2005, whether the decisions of the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency or the European Medicines Agency are binding on the Executive and the NHS in Scotland.
Answer
Before a medicine can be placed on the UK market it must have a marketing authorisation either from the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency or the European Medicines Agency. Decisions on the marketing authorisations of medicines made by the MHRA or the EMEA are binding on the Executive and the NHS in Scotland.
Information about the MHRA and its work can be found at www.mhra.gov.uk.
- Asked by: Alex Neil, MSP for Central Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 30 November 2005
-
Current Status:
Answered by Andy Kerr on 12 December 2005
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S2W-20285 by Mr Andy Kerr on 10 November 2005, why the Scottish Medicines Consortium does not recommend that Memantine (Exiba ®) is used to treat moderately severe to severe Alzheimer’s Disease and whether this indicates that the drug is used to treat milder cases of Alzheimer’s Disease.
Answer
The Scottish Medicines Consortium (SMC) reviewed memantine (Ebixa) in July 2003 and did not recommend it for use within NHS Scotland. Its advice was that, although this is currently the only agent licensed for use in moderately severe to severe Alzheimer's disease, the magnitude of the effect is extremely small. Compared with placebo it is associated with a statistically significant reduction in the rate of deterioration in global, functional and cognitive scales. On the evidence presented, the associated gains appear to be marginal relative to the overall costs.
The company subsequently made a resubmission to SMC for assessment and in December 2003 SMC did not recommend it for use. The economic case submitted by the manufacturer did not suggest that use of this drug would be cost effective relative to standard practice in Scotland.
The licensed indication submitted for review was for the treatment of patients with moderately severe to severe Alzheimer's disease and SMC therefore commented on this indication only.