- Asked by: Alex Johnstone, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 23 October 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jim Wallace on 6 November 2001
To ask the Scottish Executive (a) how many existing adult mandatory life prisoners will be affected by the Convention Rights (Compliance) (Scotland) Act 2001 and (b) when hearings under the Act in respect of such prisoners will be completed.
Answer
Four hundred and sixty-three existing adult mandatory life prisoners are affected by the transitional provisions of the Convention Rights (Compliance) (Scotland) Act 2001, in as much as they will require to have a punishment part set at a hearing before the High Court of Justiciary. In addition, there are 24 such prisoners, who have the right under the Act, to waive their entitlement to a hearing, in which case their punishment parts will be deemed to have been fixed by other methods set out in the Act. The Scottish ministers are required to refer the cases of those affected to the High Court of Justiciary but arrangements for the hearings are the responsibility of the court. At this time the court is unable accurately to forecast when the hearings will be completed.
- Asked by: Alex Johnstone, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 02 October 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Alasdair Morrison on 29 October 2001
To ask the Scottish Executive what action it plans to take to support the golf tourism industry and local economies in areas such as Carnoustie following the recent terrorist attacks in the United States of America.
Answer
The marketing of Scotland as a golf tourism destination is and will continue to be a high priority. VisitScotland has reviewed its marketing strategy in the light of the 11 September events and will target its campaigns carefully in order to maximise opportunities. Funding for VisitScotland is at a record level.
- Asked by: Alex Johnstone, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 04 September 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Wendy Alexander on 18 September 2001
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S1W-17516 by Ms Wendy Alexander on 29 August 2001, what its response was to the Arbroath aid package proposals and whether it intends to give any further response.
Answer
The letters of 11 May and 13 June to which I referred in my earlier answer of 29 August provided detailed comments on the proposals contained in the Arbroath Aid Package and suggestions as to how these proposals could be taken forward by Angus Council and Scottish Enterprise Tayside. Since this exchange of correspondence took place, the First Minister met with the Member for Angus on 23 August to discuss measures to promote economic development in Angus, and Scottish Executive officials met with representatives of Angus Council and Scottish Enterprise Tayside on 3 September to discuss progress in implementing the Arbroath Aid Package proposals.
- Asked by: Alex Johnstone, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 14 August 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Wendy Alexander on 29 August 2001
To ask the Scottish Executive when it will give its official response to the aid package proposals for the Arbroath area submitted in January 2001 by Angus Council and other groups.
Answer
The First Minister responded to Angus Council and partners concerning the Arbroath Aid Package proposals in his letter of 11 May 2001. In addition I myself wrote to the council and to Scottish Enterprise Tayside about the Arbroath Aid Package proposals on 13 June 2001.
- Asked by: Alex Johnstone, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 14 August 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 22 August 2001
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S1W-16697 by Ross Finnie on 9 August 2001, whether it will work with Her Majesty's Government to ensure that the test that is used in the UK to examine compound animal feedstuffs for the presence of mammalian protein is validated to the satisfaction of EU requirements as soon as possible.
Answer
The Executive is working with the UK Government to ensure that this important task is completed at the earliest possible opportunity.
- Asked by: Alex Johnstone, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 28 June 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 9 August 2001
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it will make representations to Her Majesty's Government to oppose the proposals by the European Union to ban the use of fishmeal in ruminant feeds and what information it has on the scientific basis of these proposals.
Answer
In agreement with the Scottish Executive, the UK Government has made representations to the European Union on the fishmeal issue throughout the legislative process. As a result fishmeal has not been banned from feeding to non-ruminant livestock. The UK has raised the possibility of a relaxation of the ban on feeding fishmeal to ruminants in the Standing Veterinary Committee and the Council. In the Agricultural Council of 19 June the Commission promised to review this ban once a test had been validated that is capable of differentiating between animal and fish protein in feed. The UK uses an ELISA to test compound animal feedingstuffs for the presence of mammalian protein, but this test has not yet been validated. Until this problem can be resolved we have no option but to implement the Community ban.The scientific basis for the ban on the use of fishmeal in ruminant feeds came from the EU Scientific Steering Committee, who considered possible scientific reasons for a general feed ban on meat and bone meal (MBM) to all farmed animals on 27/28 November 2000. Their opinion, which was published on the 29 November, stated that the risk of propagation of BSE and other TSEs was increased by the possibility of cross-contamination of animal feed. Cross contamination with possibly BSE contaminated ruminant MBM is a serious problem. A ban on the use of MBM containing feed for animals minimises this risk.
- Asked by: Alex Johnstone, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 28 June 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 26 July 2001
To ask the Scottish Executive what its policy is on the use of fishmeal in ruminant feeds.
Answer
As required by the Scotland Act, the Executive will observe its EU obligations and intends to introduce shortly legislation that will ban the use of fishmeal in ruminant feeds as of 1 August this year. However, the Executive will continue to press for the return of fishmeal in ruminant rations as soon as the potential for cross-contamination to occur can be discounted by a suitable testing protocol, which the EU is committed to pursuing.
- Asked by: Alex Johnstone, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 20 June 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Lewis Macdonald on 28 June 2001
To ask the Scottish Executive what further assistance it plans to make available to Angus Council to help it meet the costs of the replacement bridge over the South Esk at Montrose.
Answer
The Executive announced on 23 November that Angus Council would receive £2.8 million, included in its capital allocations, to enable work to start on the Montrose Bridge replacement project. We will continue to work with Angus Council on this matter.
- Asked by: Alex Johnstone, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 20 June 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Peter Peacock on 28 June 2001
To ask the Scottish Executive whether, in the light of recent press articles, its position on not reviewing local authority boundaries in the foreseeable future has changed.
Answer
There are no plans for a review of local authority boundaries.
- Asked by: Alex Johnstone, MSP for North East Scotland, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 15 May 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Ross Finnie on 31 May 2001
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it has been counting adjacent outbreaks of foot-and-mouth disease as single outbreaks.
Answer
Each infected premises is counted as a single case for counting purposes.