- Asked by: Nicola Sturgeon, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 14 January 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Malcolm Chisholm on 28 January 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive how it is encouraging local authorities (a) to implement existing guidance on brain injury and (b) to ensure that services for brain injured people are clearly explained in the Joint Strategy documents currently being drawn up with health boards and social work services departments.
Answer
Our guidance to local authorities on community care planning contained in SWSG 35/1997 remains extant. Local authorities are required to update and roll forward annually their community care plans in partnership with health boards. All plans are produced jointly with NHS boards. In early 2000, we issued to health boards, trusts and local authorities a Scottish Needs Assessment Programme report on the needs of people with brain injuries, and invited these agencies to respond to the findings and recommendations intended to improve care planning and provision. Community Care Plans are primarily for use locally, and are intended to help agencies develop strategic thinking on a joint basis, and plans are a matter of public record. We also provide core funding to Headway Scotland, the brain injured association, which, in addition to providing support services locally for sufferers, also helps to raise awareness of the needs of the brain injured with the statutory service providers.
- Asked by: Nicola Sturgeon, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 14 January 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Malcolm Chisholm on 28 January 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive how it is monitoring the implementation of existing guidance for local authorities on brain injury.
Answer
Local authorities are required to produce and publish Community Care Plans every three years, and to review these annually. Officials scrutinise these plans for their content.
- Asked by: Nicola Sturgeon, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 18 December 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Malcolm Chisholm on 28 January 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive what impact any reduction in staffed bed rates in (a) all acute specialities and (b) acute specialities in Lothian Health Board hospitals arising from the move to the new Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh will have on (i) the number of in-patient admissions from the accident and emergency department, (ii) average waiting times, (iii) the number of postponed or cancelled elective admissions and (iv) the morale of hospital staff.
Answer
NHS Lothian successfully commissioned the first phase of the new Royal Infirmary on 27 January, and phase 2 will follow in early 2003. The new hospital will offer first class surroundings and state of the art equipment to match the excellent clinical care already delivered by health professionals in Lothian. Overall bed numbers are planned on a cross-Lothian basis. A review was undertaken in 1999 by Lothian Health Board of planned acute bed numbers for the new Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh. This confirmed that the proposed numbers were adequate in the context of the board's plans for developing community and primary care services. The balance between hospital and community services, and therefore the requirement for acute beds, is kept under regular review.NHSScotland will continue to respond to the needs of patients within the policy framework provided by the Scottish Executive, which emphasises the importance of patient-centred services and reductions in waiting to meet key targets.
- Asked by: Nicola Sturgeon, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 18 December 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Malcolm Chisholm on 28 January 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive what role the downsi'ing of acute bed capacity in the NHS currently plays in its health care delivery strategy.
Answer
Acute bed numbers must reflect patients' health care needs. Over time, patterns of care in acute hospitals have changed, with shorter lengths of stay and much greater use of day surgery. As a result, fewer acute beds have been necessary to support treatment of patients.Detailed decisions about bed numbers in the light of these service developments are most appropriately carried out at NHS board level, where local needs and priorities are best understood, and where decisions can best be made about meeting the health needs of the local population safely and sustainably.The Scottish Executive continues to monitor carefully trends in the level and pattern of care to ensure that resources are used in the most effective manner to meet patients' needs.
- Asked by: Nicola Sturgeon, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 24 December 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Malcolm Chisholm on 21 January 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the publication of the Scottish Health Plan, Our National Health: A plan for action, a plan for change, what barriers have been identified and/or removed to allow closer working between NHS Boards and local authorities to improve public health.
Answer
The Community Care and Health (Scotland) Bill, introduced on 24 September 2001, Part 2, Section 12 allows NHS bodies and local authorities to work together in different ways by removing some of the legal barriers to joint working which currently exist.A consultation paper on the Executive's proposals for a Local Government Bill issued in early December 2001 with a closing date for responses on 6 February 2002. One of the proposals in the Bill is a general power for councils to promote the well-being of their area. This power will remove any constraints on councils from developing a broader and more innovative role. The legislation will introduce a duty on other bodies such as NHS Boards to engage in the Community Planning process. The Bill will be introduced in spring this year.The Executive is providing support for two posts based in COSLA which will further enhance local authorities' public health capacity. Funding of £1.5 million over three years has also been made available to support joint funded health improvement posts in every local authority.
- Asked by: Nicola Sturgeon, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 24 December 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Malcolm Chisholm on 21 January 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the publication of the Scottish Health Plan, Our National Health: A plan for action, a plan for change, when its recruitment campaign to encourage people to be part of local decision-making in the NHS was launched and what effect that campaign has had to date.
Answer
In September 2001, we established 15 new NHS boards to enhance local decision making in NHSScotland. The membership of the new boards - which now includes elected local councillors, NHS staff and clinicians - has been specifically designed to provide a better reflection of the communities they serve.Putting in place the new, unified local NHS systems has involved more than 100 new non-executive appointments to NHS boards and trusts since January 2001, each of which has been made in line with guidance issued by the Commissioner for Public Appointments. This process has included local and national advertising campaigns, most notably for the Chairpersons of 13 NHS boards and five trusts, which have attracted a wide range of applicants from diverse backgrounds.Additionally, Patient Focus and Public Involvement, published in December 2001, requires each new NHS Board to work closely with its community planning partners and voluntary organisations to develop a sustainable framework to support local public involvement.
- Asked by: Nicola Sturgeon, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 24 December 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Malcolm Chisholm on 21 January 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the publication of the Scottish Health Plan, Our National Health: A plan for action, a plan for change, how it is encouraging the consistent development of clinical information systems across Scotland.
Answer
The consistent development of clinical information systems across Scotland is being supported by the work of the Clinical Standards Board for Scotland, ISD and Audit Scotland. During 2001 they held two national meetings to review national databases in order to identify information sources suitable for monitoring the quality of direct patient care. A further meeting is planned with wider participation in spring 2002. In addition improving the quality of clinical information was a key strand of the recent CRAG Symposium, Improving Quality of Care for Patients: Sharing Principles and Practice. This showcased examples of good practice in developing consistent information systems to support direct patient care and to bring about improvements in patient management. CRAG has also supported the development of the Strategy Programme for Information & Management which sets out national and local programmes and targets for establishing greater collaboration and consistency of approach to the development of information management and technology (IM&T) across NHS Scotland. As part of this wider work CRAG will support a conference on IM&T systems in April.
- Asked by: Nicola Sturgeon, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 24 December 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Malcolm Chisholm on 21 January 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the publication of the Scottish Health Plan, Our National Health: A plan for action, a plan for change, what the current stage of development is of the communications programme for the Health Department and the NHS in Scotland.
Answer
Since the publication of Our National Health: a plan for action, a plan for change, a number of steps have been taken to improve communications with and by NHSScotland. For example, ministers meet regularly with NHS Board Chairs, the Chief Executive of NHSScotland holds regular meetings with NHS Chief Executives and senior officials have regular dialogue with key stakeholder groups. The importance of effective two-way communication features highly in these discussions.Effective communication with patients and the public is a key theme of the plans outlined in Patient Focus and Public Involvement published in December 2001.Additionally, the Health Department has introduced a web-based Weekly Bulletin aimed at alerting the NHS, local authorities and other key stakeholders to publications, guidance and other papers issued by the department. The department has recently appointed a Corporate Communications Manager who will have a key role in working with NHSScotland to develop a structured programme to further improve communications.
- Asked by: Nicola Sturgeon, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 24 December 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Malcolm Chisholm on 21 January 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the publication of the Scottish Health Plan, Our National Health: A plan for action, a plan for change, when it will establish an expert group to support and advise local NHS Boards in managing changes.
Answer
Our National Health: A plan for action, a plan for change, set out the Executive's intention to establish an expert group to support and advise local NHS Boards in managing changes in the configuration of services and to advise the Health Department on the appropriateness of local reconfiguration. I expect to make an announcement about this in the next few weeks.
- Asked by: Nicola Sturgeon, MSP for Glasgow, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 24 December 2001
-
Current Status:
Answered by Malcolm Chisholm on 21 January 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the publication of the Scottish Health Plan, Our National Health: A plan for action, a plan for change, what funding the Scottish Community Diet Project received, or will receive, in (a) 2000-01, (b) 2001-02 and (c) 2002-03.
Answer
The Scottish Community Diet Project received £197,843 and £294,615 in 2000-01 and 2001-02 respectively, and is due to receive £381,350 in 2002-03. As specified in the Our National Health commitment, the grant provided in 2000-01 included an increase to allow the project to support over 50% more projects than previously budgeted for.