- Asked by: Fiona Hyslop, MSP for Lothians, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 19 September 2006
-
Current Status:
Answered by Nicol Stephen on 6 October 2006
To ask the Scottish Executive, with reference to Consolidated Resource Accounts for the Year Ended 31 March 2005, what factors caused the Student Awards Agency for Scotland's underspend to be less than predicted on student fees, support through the Quigley agreement, resource aspects of student loans and other schemes.
Answer
The underspend was due to thenumber of students being less than originally anticipated, resulting in underspendson various SAAS schemes and also an underspend in the resource cost of student loans.
- Asked by: Fiona Hyslop, MSP for Lothians, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 19 September 2006
-
Current Status:
Answered by Nicol Stephen on 6 October 2006
To ask the Scottish Executive what the (a) mean, (b) mode and (c) median student loan debt is for Scottish borrowers who ceased to be students during 2006.
Answer
The following table shows themean, mode and median student loan debt for Scottish borrowers who entered repaymentin 2006:
Student Loan Debt for ScottishDomiciled Borrowers, as at 31 March 2006
| Student Loan Debt |
Mode | £4,214 |
Median | £4,259 |
Mean | £5,891 |
Source: Student Loans Company.
It should be noted that debtis calculated at the point of entering repayment (i.e. 31 March 2006) ratherthan at the point of graduation. Therefore, the majority of customers who have ceasedto be students in 2006 will not enter repayment until 2007 and we cannot providefigures for these students as yet.
- Asked by: Fiona Hyslop, MSP for Lothians, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 19 September 2006
-
Current Status:
Answered by Nicol Stephen on 6 October 2006
To ask the Scottish Executive what steps it will take to improve the quality of its statistics on graduate destinations.
Answer
The data that the Scottish Executivecurrently holds on graduate destinations comes from two sources. Information ongraduates from Higher Education Institutions is provided by the Higher EducationStatistics Agency (HESA) from their Destination of Leavers from Higher Education(DLHE) survey. Information on graduates from Further Education Colleges is providedby the Scottish Funding Council (SFC) and their First Destination of Graduates (FDG)survey.
The destination information currentlycollected gives details of graduates activities and location approximately six monthsafter graduating.
HESA have successfully piloteda longitudinal survey that aims to find out what graduates have been doing, overa longer period of time, since completing their studies. It will survey graduatesthree and a half years after graduation has been completed. The first full DLHELongitudinal survey will take place this winter. A sample of graduates from the2002-03 leaving cohort will be surveyed.
The FDG survey is currently carriedout by Scotland’s Further Education Colleges. The Scottish Funding Councilhas indicated that they are looking to implement a more standardised approach. Thiswill include internet access for students undertaking the survey. It is hoped tohave this structure in place next year, which would mean that students graduatingin 2007-08 would be the first to be influenced by this change.
- Asked by: Fiona Hyslop, MSP for Lothians, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 19 September 2006
-
Current Status:
Answered by Nicol Stephen on 6 October 2006
To ask the Scottish Executive what sums it has paid to the purchasing banks in each year since 1998 in respect of the student loans sold by HM Treasury in 1998 and 1999 and what obligations were covered by these sums.
Answer
The information requested isgiven in the following table:
. | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | Total |
(£000) Subsidy | (£000) Write Off’s | (£000) Loans Repurchased | (£000) First Loss Claims | (£000) First Loss Repayments | (£000) Adjustment |
1998-991 | 6,438 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | -1 | 6,437 |
1999-2000 | 10,754 | 114 | 104 | 1 | 0 | 1,236 | 12,209 |
2000-01 | 12,471 | 52 | 83 | 1,596 | 0 | 638 | 14,840 |
2001-02 | 8,595 | 93 | 22 | 3,229 | -44 | -551 | 11,344 |
2002-03 | 8,610 | 95 | 25 | 2,349 | -108 | -326 | 10,645 |
2003-04 | 5,611 | 162 | 95 | 1,495 | -221 | -90 | 7,052 |
2004-05 | 5,075 | 193 | 41 | 1,134 | -217 | 999 | 7,225 |
2005-06 | 4,712 | 461 | 30 | 1,630 | -289 | 0 | 6,544 |
Note: 1 – Scottish Office Figures.
Column 1 – The subsidy is thepayment made to the purchasing banks to cover the difference between the commercialrate of interest the banks would normally charge and the rate of inflation theyare required to charge by the regulations.
Column 2 – Payments are madeto the purchasing banks for loans which are written off due to age or death.
Column 3 – Shows payments madefor loans which are “repurchased” and returned to the government portfolio for reasonsof permanent disability or being medically unfit for work.
Column 4 - First loss claims,reimburse the purchasing banks for loans which become 24 months or more in arrears,as these loans no longer attract the interest rate subsidy.
Column 5 - First loss repaymentsare deducted from the total Executive payment as loan repayments can still be receivedafter the first loss claim is put in place, i.e. after the bad debt is written off.
Column 6 - Adjustments can bemade to the figures in respect of year-end reconciliations between what has beenpaid by the DfES and the devolved administrations. Adjustments can also be madeto reflect accruals and differences in spend across financial years.
- Asked by: Fiona Hyslop, MSP for Lothians, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 19 September 2006
-
Current Status:
Answered by Nicol Stephen on 6 October 2006
To ask the Scottish Executive what factors have caused the fall in the Age Participation Index since 2001-02.
Answer
The fall in the Age ParticipationIndex is likely to have been influenced by a number of factors. The Executive intendsto engage with the Scottish Funding Council and with colleges and universities todiscuss the issue in detail and will take appropriate action in light of these discussions.
- Asked by: Fiona Hyslop, MSP for Lothians, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 19 September 2006
-
Current Status:
Answered by Nicol Stephen on 6 October 2006
To ask the Scottish Executive, with reference to Consolidated Resource Accounts for the Year Ended 31 March 2005, why £38 million was received in student loan repayments when £29 million is shown as income applied for the Student Awards Agency for Scotland.
Answer
There is no correlation betweenthe two figures. The £38 million is student loan repayments whereas the £29 millioncomprises capitalised interest (£29.3 million) and repayment of awards (£21,000).
- Asked by: Fiona Hyslop, MSP for Lothians, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 19 September 2006
-
Current Status:
Answered by Nicol Stephen on 6 October 2006
To ask the Scottish Executive how many student loan borrowers domiciled in Scotland, now in repayment status, had their payments outweighed by interest charged on their loans in the most recent year for which figures are available.
Answer
When considered in real terms,no student loan borrower in any stage of repayment will have payments outweighedby interest charged on their loans.
Thereal rate of interest on student loans is zero, as the interest charge simply coversinflation. Therefore, any repayment made, no matter how small, would always resultin a borrower owing less in real terms.
If no repayments were made, theborrower would still owe the same amount in real terms.
- Asked by: Fiona Hyslop, MSP for Lothians, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 19 September 2006
-
Current Status:
Answered by Nicol Stephen on 6 October 2006
To ask the Scottish Executive how graduate endowment income has been spent since it became available.
Answer
Graduate Endowment income becameavailable in 2005-06 and in accordance with section 2 of The Education (GraduateEndowment and Student Support) (Scotland) Act 2001 has been applied in the provision of studentsupport.
- Asked by: Fiona Hyslop, MSP for Lothians, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 15 September 2006
-
Current Status:
Answered by Tom McCabe on 28 September 2006
To ask the Scottish Executive for which local authorities it has still to approve electoral arrangement orders submitted by the Local Government Boundary Commission for Scotland, also indicating the length of time since these orders were submitted.
Answer
The Local GovernmentBoundary Commission for Scotland submitted their report on the North LanarkshireCouncil Area on 22 August. This is still within the 6 week period during whichno decisions can be made. Information on other local authority areas for whichan Electoral Arrangements Order has yet to be made (information correct as of22 September) is detailed in the following table:
Local Authority | Date Report Submitted by Commission |
Aberdeen City | 1 August 2006 |
City of Edinburgh | 17 July 2006 |
Fife | 13 June 2006 |
Glasgow City | 27 July 2006 |
Highland | 27 July 2006 |
Na h-Eileanan an Iar | 10 April 2006 |
Renfrewshire | 7 August 2006 |
Scottish Borders | 3 July 2006 |
Shetland Islands | 10 April 2006 |
West Dunbartonshire | 17 July 2006 |
West Lothian | 6 June 2006 |
- Asked by: Fiona Hyslop, MSP for Lothians, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 15 September 2006
-
Current Status:
Answered by Tom McCabe on 28 September 2006
To ask the Scottish Executive how many electoral arrangement orders for the 2007 election have been disputed by local authorities.
Answer
Representations have beenreceived from 11 authorities following publication of the Local GovernmentBoundary Commission for Scotland’s report for their council area. These authoritieswere Angus, City of Edinburgh, Comhairle Nan Eilean Siar, Dumfries and Galloway, East Renfrewshire, Fife, Perth and Kinross, Renfrewshire, Shetland Islands, West Dunbartonshire, and West Lothian.