- Asked by: Elaine Smith, MSP for Coatbridge and Chryston, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Monday, 15 August 2011
-
Current Status:
Answered by Aileen Campbell on 12 September 2011
To ask the Scottish Executive what procedure reporters follow when making a decision on a local plan examination.
Answer
The procedures are set out in Part 4 of the Town and Country Planning (Development Planning) (Scotland) Regulations 2008.
- Asked by: Elaine Smith, MSP for Coatbridge and Chryston, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Monday, 15 August 2011
-
Current Status:
Answered by Aileen Campbell on 12 September 2011
To ask the Scottish Executive what consideration it will give to intervening in the North Lanarkshire local plan.
Answer
This matter will be considered after North Lanarkshire Council have sent Scottish Ministers a copy of the plan they wish to adopt and the advert of their intention to adopt the plan.
- Asked by: Elaine Smith, MSP for Coatbridge and Chryston, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Monday, 15 August 2011
-
Current Status:
Answered by Aileen Campbell on 12 September 2011
To ask the Scottish Executive whether a decision made by a reporter in a local plan examination requires to be signed off by ministers.
Answer
Development plan examination reports are not signed off by ministers, but ministers do have the opportunity to intervene later in the process.
I refer the member to the answer to question S4W-02188 on 12 September 2011. All answers to written parliamentary questions are available on the Parliament’s website, the search facility for which can be found at:
http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/Apps2/MAQASearch/QAndMSearch.aspx.
- Asked by: Elaine Smith, MSP for Coatbridge and Chryston, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Monday, 15 August 2011
-
Current Status:
Answered by Aileen Campbell on 12 September 2011
To ask the Scottish Executive under what circumstances it would be acceptable to alter land zoned as greenbelt to land suitable for construction.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer to question S4W-02199 on 12 September 2011. All answers to written parliamentary questions are available on the Parliament’s website, the search facility for which can be found at http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/parliamentarybusiness/28877.aspx.
- Asked by: Elaine Smith, MSP for Coatbridge and Chryston, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Monday, 15 August 2011
-
Current Status:
Answered by Aileen Campbell on 12 September 2011
To ask the Scottish Executive whether section 20(7) of the Planning etc. (Scotland) Act 2006 confers on ministers the power to make a final decision following the examination of the North Lanarkshire local plan.
Answer
Section 20(7) gives ministers the powers to direct that the plan will only be constituted if and when approved by ministers.
- Asked by: Elaine Smith, MSP for Coatbridge and Chryston, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Monday, 15 August 2011
-
Current Status:
Answered by Aileen Campbell on 12 September 2011
To ask the Scottish Executive what circumstances would be required to satisfy the necessity test in Scottish Planning Policy when releasing land previously zoned as greenbelt.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer to question S4W-02202 on 12 September 2011. All answers to written parliamentary questions are available on the Parliament’s website, the search facility for which can be found at http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/parliamentarybusiness/28877.aspx.
- Asked by: Elaine Smith, MSP for Coatbridge and Chryston, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Monday, 15 August 2011
-
Current Status:
Answered by Aileen Campbell on 12 September 2011
To ask the Scottish Executive what avenues of appeal exist after a local plan has been adopted.
Answer
Following the adoption of a local plan, any aggrieved person may question the validity of the plan through an application to the Court of Session under Section 238 of the Town and Country Planning (Scotland) Act 1997. Such an application must be made within six weeks of the publication of the adopted plan.
- Asked by: Elaine Smith, MSP for Coatbridge and Chryston, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Monday, 15 August 2011
-
Current Status:
Answered by Aileen Campbell on 12 September 2011
To ask the Scottish Executive at which point in a local plan examination process ministers are no longer able to intervene.
Answer
Ministers have no powers to intervene in the examination process, but may intervene in the planning authority’s subsequent actions to adopt the plan.
I refer the member to the answer to question S4W-02188 on 12 September 2011. All answers to written parliamentary questions are available on the Parliament’s website, the search facility for which can be found at http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/Apps2/MAQASearch/QAndMSearch.aspx.
- Asked by: Elaine Smith, MSP for Coatbridge and Chryston, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Monday, 15 August 2011
-
Current Status:
Answered by Aileen Campbell on 12 September 2011
To ask the Scottish Executive what arrangements are in place for the transition from local plans to local development plans.
Answer
These are set out in the Planning etc. (Scotland) Act 2006 (Development Planning) (Saving, Transitional and Consequential Provisions) Order 2008. The effect is that those local plans which had progressed through the consultation stage but not to public local inquiry stage when the new development planning arrangements were commenced at February 2009 could still progress, but would be examined under the new arrangements.
- Asked by: Elaine Smith, MSP for Coatbridge and Chryston, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Monday, 15 August 2011
-
Current Status:
Answered by Aileen Campbell on 12 September 2011
To ask the Scottish Executive under what circumstances it would be acceptable to build on greenbelt land.
Answer
It is for planning authorities to set out their policies to manage development in green belt areas in their development plans. Scottish Planning Policy (SPP) states that green belt designation should provide clarity and certainty on where development will and will not take place, and provides examples of types of development that may be appropriate in green belts, such as development associated with agriculture. It also notes that other proposals may be acceptable where they are a national priority or to meet an established need if no other site is available. Green belts are not necessarily permanent, and SPP notes that where it is considered necessary, the proposed release of land previously designated as green belt should be identified as part of the settlement strategy set out in the development plan.