- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 09 October 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Cathy Jamieson on 29 October 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive what data it has on retrospective studies of outcomes in terms of actual placements following secure care authorisations by children's hearings, as recommended in section 2.6 of Secure Accommodation Advisory Group Interim Report May 2001.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer given to question S1W-30448 today. All answers to written parliamentary questions are available on the Parliament's website, the search facility for which can be found at
http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/webapp/search_wa.
- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 09 October 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Cathy Jamieson on 29 October 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive how many young people were retained in secure units due to a lack of follow-up facilities in (a) 1999-2000, (b) 2000-01, (c) 2001-02 and (d) 2002-03 to date.
Answer
The information requested is not held centrally.
- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 09 October 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Cathy Jamieson on 29 October 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive what (a) alternatives to secure care exist and (b) funding was allocated to these alternatives in (i) 1999-2000, (ii) 2000-01, (iii) 2001-02 and (iv) 2002-03 to date.
Answer
There are a number of close support units in Scotland, offering alternatives to secure accommodation. Local authorities are also able to use youth crime monies to develop such services, £13.5 million has been allocated to local authorities between 1999-2000 to 2002-03. On 18 October, I announced a new Intensive Support Fund of £3 million to enable both local authorities and voluntary organisations to increase the level of community-based supervision of young offenders, to improve the quality of care in secure and to improve support for those returning to their communities from secure accommodation.
- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 09 October 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Cathy Jamieson on 29 October 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive when the final report of the Secure Accommodation Advisory Group will be published.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer given to question S1W-30212 on 23 October 2002. All answers to written parliamentary questionsare available on the Parliament's website, the search facility for which can be found at
http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/webapp/search_wa.
- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Monday, 07 October 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Iain Gray on 29 October 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive whether any specific small institution funding could be made available to the Heriot-Watt University Scottish Borders campus in relation to its textile, clothing and fashion courses.
Answer
The allocation of funds to individual higher education institutions is a matter for the Scottish Higher Education Funding Council (SHEFC). Ministers are expressly prevented, in terms of the Further and Higher Education (Scotland) Act 1992, from framing SHEFC grant conditions by reference to particular institutions or programmes.
- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 09 October 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Cathy Jamieson on 29 October 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive what steps have been taken, and when, regarding financial support for the provision of secure care, as recommended in section 2.5 of Secure Accommodation Advisory Group Interim Report May 2001.
Answer
I refer the member to the answer given to question S1W-30448 today. All answers to written parliamentary questions are available on the Parliament's website, the search facility for which can be found at
http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/webapp/search_wa.
- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Tuesday, 15 October 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Cathy Jamieson on 29 October 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive whether it has issued guidelines on the average caseload of community social workers.
Answer
The Scottish Executive has issued no guidance on average caseloads for social workers working in the community. Employers take account of complexity, local circumstances such as geography and the experience of individual social workers in determining caseloads.
- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 11 October 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Cathy Jamieson on 29 October 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive, further to the answer to question S1W-28350 by Cathy Jamieson on 23 September 2002 and with regard to Annex B, paragraph 8 of its Social Work Services Group circular SWSG 9/98, what the normal upper age limit is for (a) new and (b) reappointed members of children's panels.
Answer
Panel members are normally recruited up to the age of 60 and will not usually be re-appointed beyond the 15 May following their 65 birthday. However, if recommended by a Children's Panel Advisory Committee (CPAC), appointments may be made up to the age of 62 for new applicants. Reappointment of serving panel members beyond their 65 birthday may also be approved subject to a recommendation by a CPAC. Reasons might include recruitment or retention difficulties affecting the balance of skills and experience, age or gender of the panel. This change was notified to CPACs on 18 August 2000. The circular is currently being updated to reflect this and other changes.
- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 09 October 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Jim Wallace on 28 October 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive how many guardianships have been (a) applied for and (b) awarded under the vulnerable adults procedures in (i) 1999-2000, (ii) 2000-01, (iii) 2001-02 and (iv) 2002-03 to date, broken down by local authority.
Answer
Information on the number of guardianships granted under the Mental Health (Scotland) Act 1984 in the three years 1999-2000, 2000-01 and 2001-02, and the number applied for and granted under the Adults with Incapacity (Scotland) Act 2000 from April 2002 to date, by local authority area, is provided in the following tables. Information on the number of guardianships applied for under the 1984 act is not available centrally.Number
1 of Guardianships Granted Under the Mental Health (Scotland ) Act 1984
| Authority | 1999-2000 | 2000-01 | 2001-02 |
| Aberdeen City | 7 | 16 | 16 |
| Aberdeenshire | * | 6 | 6 |
| Angus | * | * | * |
| Argyll and Bute | * | * | * |
| Clackmannanshire | 0 | * | * |
| Dumfries and Galloway | * | * | * |
| Dundee City | 6 | * | 9 |
| East Ayrshire | * | * | * |
| East Dunbartonshire | * | * | * |
| East Lothian | * | * | * |
| East Renfrewshire | * | * | * |
| Edinburgh, City of | 12 | 17 | 21 |
| Eilean Siar | 0 | 0 | * |
| Falkirk | * | * | * |
| Fife | 9 | 17 | 19 |
| Glasgow City | 22 | 27 | 32 |
| Highland | 21 | 18 | 13 |
| Inverclyde | 0 | * | * |
| Midlothian | * | * | 0 |
| Moray | 0 | * | * |
| North Ayrshire | 0 | * | 8 |
| North Lanarkshire | * | 9 | 9 |
| Orkney | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perth and Kinross | * | * | * |
| Renfrewshire | * | * | * |
| Scottish Borders | * | * | * |
| Shetland | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| South Ayrshire | * | 6 | * |
| South Lanarkshire | * | * | * |
| Stirling | * | * | * |
| West Dunbartonshire | * | * | * |
| West Lothian | * | 6 | 10 |
| Total | 126 | 160 | 190 |
Notes:1. Information supplied by the Mental Welfare Commission for Scotland.*Number is less than five.With effect from 1 April 2002 guardianship under the Mental Health (Scotland) Act 1984 was replaced by guardianship under the Adults with Incapacity (Scotland) Act 2000. The following table provides information on the number of guardianships sought and granted since 1 April 2002 under the 2000 act.Number
1 of Guardianships Applied for and Granted Under the Adults with Incapacity (Scotland) Act 2000
| | Guardianship Applied For | Guardianship Granted |
| Welfare | Financial | Joint | Welfare | Financial | Joint |
| Aberdeen City | 15 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
| Aberdeenshire | 6 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Angus | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Argyll and Bute | 10 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 1 |
| Clackmannanshire | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Dumfries and Galloway | 5 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 |
| Dundee City | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| East Ayrshire | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| East Dunbartonshire | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| East Lothian | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| East Renfrewshire | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Edinburgh, City of | 7 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 1 |
| Eilean Siar | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Falkirk | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| Fife | 6 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 1 |
| Glasgow City | 14 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 1 |
| Highland | 13 | 2 | 0 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
| Inverclyde | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Midlothian | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Moray | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| North Ayrshire | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| North Lanarkshire | 5 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 0 |
| Orkney | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perth and Kinross | 9 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Renfrewshire | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Scottish Borders | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Shetland | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| South Ayrshire | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| South Lanarkshire | 5 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 |
| Stirling | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| West Dunbartonshire | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| West Lothian | 6 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 135 | 25 | 26 | 89 | 10 | 9 |
Note:1. Information supplied by the Office of the Public Guardian.
- Asked by: Christine Grahame, MSP for South of Scotland, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Wednesday, 09 October 2002
-
Current Status:
Answered by Cathy Jamieson on 28 October 2002
To ask the Scottish Executive what the average case load has been for social workers in (a) 1999-2000, (b) 2000-01, (c) 2001-02 and (d) 2002-03 to date, broken down by local authority.
Answer
This information is not held centrally.