Data in relation to the housing circumstances and employment status of individuals released from custody is not available.

Individuals serving short-term sentences are not routinely subject to any form of post-release supervision or monitoring, and those that had supervision or monitoring requirements post-sentence were automatically excluded from both the Coronavirus specific early release process in 2020 and the Emergency Early Release process in 2024.

Pre-release planning, including in relation to housing needs, was a key feature of both of the emergency early release processes (2020 & 2024). The Scottish Prison Service (SPS) worked closely with representatives from Local Government – including housing departments, wider public bodies, and the third sector in the planning and operation of the processes.

I have asked Teresa Medhurst, Chief Executive of the Scottish Prison Service (SPS), to respond. Her response is as follows:

The following table shows the number of prisoners who were released during the last 5 years under early release arrangements. The numbers provided relate to the 2020 COVID 19 Early Release Scheme and the 2024 Emergency Early Release Regulations:

a. Food Standards Scotland liaises extensively with the Food Standards Agency, who are responsible for food safety in England, Wales and Northern Ireland, before advising Scottish Ministers of the need to amend any food safety legislation in Scotland. This is undertaken in line with the provisionally agreed Common Framework for Food Safety and Hygiene.

b. The UK is an active member of the Codex Alimentarius Commission (Codex), the body responsible for developing international food standards, guidelines and codes of practice. Codex standards aim to harmonise national food safety regulations to ensure safety, quality and fairness in international food trade and to protect consumers. Food Standards Scotland and the Food Standards Agency liaise with the Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, the lead UK Government Department for Codex, to represent the UK position in Codex on food safety matters within our remit, such as food hygiene, food additives, methods analysis and sampling, food contaminants and imports import and export certification systems.

Food Standards Scotland (FSS) uses a data-driven approach to measure the effectiveness of its public awareness campaigns, ensuring they drive meaningful change in consumer behaviour and food safety awareness. The evaluation methods include:

Consumer Tracking & Surveys FSS Consumer Tracker: Regular surveys assess consumer awareness, understanding, and trust in FSS. Recent results show 8 in 10 adults in Scotland have heard of FSS.

Pre- and Post-Campaign Research: Evaluates shifts in public perception and behaviour before and after key campaigns.

Social Media Metrics: Engagement rates (likes, shares, comments) and reach help measure the impact of online campaigns.

Website Analytics: Tracking page views, dwell time, and downloads of guidance materials indicates audience interest and information retention.

Media Coverage Analysis: Volume, sentiment, and audience reach of press and broadcast coverage provide insights into campaign effectiveness.

Food Safety & Fraud Reporting: Changes in public reporting of food safety concerns and food crime cases following awareness efforts.

Public Sentiment Analysis: Social listening tools help gauge real-time reactions to food safety incidents and misinformation.

Quarterly Reporting to the Executive Management Board & Finance and Business Committee (FBC): Key performance indicators (KPIs) track campaign success.

Lessons Learned Assessments: Inform future improvements to communications strategy.

Food made from Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO) is classed as a regulated product. Therefore, it must undergo rigorous pre-market safety and risk analysis before sale in Scotland. This analysis will inform Food Standards Scotland (FSS) risk management recommendations to Scottish Ministers who decide whether to authorise a product. The FSS Regulated Products Service monitors all GMO products, and all businesses are legally required to report any new/emerging information that may affect the safety of an authorised product. The FSS Website contains guidelines for GMO’s including labelling and traceability and links to the register of authorised GMO’s.

Food Standards Scotland (FSS) plays a role in supporting food safety education in schools, providing accessible, science-based resources to help young people develop essential food hygiene and nutrition skills. FSS continues to engage with educators, public health partners, and digital platforms to promote food safety awareness among young people albeit on a more reactive basis currently.

FSS also provides free teaching materials and support materials for lesson planning aligned with the Curriculum for Excellence, helping schools integrate food safety into learning. The FSS website hosts interactive educational content and games, offering guidance on foodborne illnesses, allergens, and safe food handling. A supply of physical teaching resources including food flashcards and large printed versions of the Eatwell Guide are available upon request to support classroom learning. FSS has a dedicated Facebook group for teachers, providing direct support, lesson ideas, and food safety resources tailored for school use.

The Scottish Government does not hold this information

The Scottish Government does not hold this information

The Scottish Government does not hold this information

Emergency release regulations have been utilised twice within the last five years (May 2020 & June/July 2024), and on both occasions the same conditions of release were applied for individuals granted emergency early release, as would have been applied at their original scheduled liberation date.

The individuals released in both emergency early release processes were serving short-term prison sentences, and were approaching the end of those short-term sentences. Individuals serving short-term sentences are not routinely subject to additional monitoring of any kind following their release from custody at their earliest date of liberation, and therefore were not subject to such monitoring as part of the two early release processes.

Individuals whose sentence included orders requiring post-release supervision and monitoring requirements were automatically excluded from early release on both occasions.