- Asked by: Adam Harley, MSP for Strathkelvin and Bearsden, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 01 October 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Maree Todd on 29 October 2026
To ask the Scottish Government what assessment it has made of Recommendation 11 of the Thirlwall Inquiry regarding the scrutiny of neonatal deaths, and whether it will review the equivalent arrangements in Scotland to ensure that possible harm and safeguarding concerns are explicitly considered following every neonatal death.
Answer
The Scottish Government is carefully considering the findings and recommendations of the Thirlwall Inquiry.
Recommendation 11 refers to the role of Medical Examiners and the guidance on Sudden Unexpected Death In Infancy and Childhood. Our systems in Scotland differ from those in England in relation to investigation of deaths through the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal service, the guidance on investigation Sudden Unexpected Deaths in Infancy and safeguarding process.
The Scottish Government will consider whether any changes to existing arrangements are required in light of the inquiry's recommendations, including how potential harm and safeguarding concerns are identified and escalated following neonatal deaths. This will be considered alongside existing review processes and wider work to strengthen learning and patient safety across maternity and neonatal services.
- Asked by: Tim Eagle, MSP for Highlands and Islands, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 01 October 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Hannah Mary Goodlad on 29 October 2026
To ask the Scottish Government what assessment it has made of the housing benefits arising from the Badenoch and Strathspey Short-Term Let Control Area, beyond changes in the total number or growth rate of registered short-term lets.
Answer
Any such assessment would be a matter for the Highland Council as the relevant planning authority that designated the control area.
- Asked by: David Barratt, MSP for Cowdenbeath, Scottish National Party
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 08 October 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Neil Gray on 29 October 2026
To ask the Scottish Government what discussions it has had with the Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service (SCTS) and justice agencies concerning what actions, if any, they are taking to ensure that requests for reasonable adjustments made by neurodivergent people are implemented consistently.
Answer
The Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service, Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service and Police Scotland have operational independence to deliver their public service duties in an inclusive and accessible way. A partnership approach is taken to agreeing and delivering a shared Justice vision through the Justice Board and this board has made clear its priorities which include a focus on designing and delivering a trauma-informed justice system that takes account of the needs of all of those who are engaged with it, whether in criminal or civil proceedings and whether they are accused, defenders, witnesses or pursuers.
- Asked by: Stephen Kerr, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 09 October 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Kirsten Oswald on 29 October 2026
To ask the Scottish Government how it will ensure that its proposed anti-strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) legislation protects journalists, whistleblowers, academics and community campaigners, including in cases arising entirely in Scotland.
Answer
In 2025, the Scottish Government consulted on strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs), calling for evidence on the prevalence of SLAPPs in Scotland and seeking views on a draft Model Law prepared by interested stakeholders. This included evidence from journalists and news organisations, legal academics and community campaigners. The Scottish Government is progressing work on the Model Law, including working with a number of stakeholders, and is committed to bringing forward reform to identify and prevent SLAPPS in this Parliamentary term.
- Asked by: Julie MacDougall, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Reform UK
-
Date lodged: Monday, 12 October 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Kirsten Oswald on 29 October 2026
To ask the Scottish Government whether it considers that there are any gaps in the collection of data relating to male and female domestic abuse incidents across Scotland and, if so, whether it will commit to addressing any such gaps, including in relation to Fife.
Answer
The Scottish Government produces a wide range of Official Statistics on domestic abuse in Scotland.
At the broadest level the Scottish Crime and Justice Survey estimates the proportion of adults living in Scotland who have experienced partner abuse, split into male and female victims and whether the latest incident of abuse was reported to the police. The survey has been revamped to include new questions on partner abuse, reflecting the latest legislation and public concern. The first results for these new questions, covering 2023-24 and 2024-25 combined, will be published next year.
Where domestic abuse comes to the attention of police, information is available in the recorded domestic abuse incidents statistics (Domestic abuse: statistics recorded by the police in Scotland, 2024-25 - gov.scot). Further details are provided in the recorded crime official statistics (for crimes recorded under the Domestic Abuse (Scotland) Act 2018 (Recorded Crime in Scotland, 2025-26 - gov.scot – see Table 2A), as well as the homicide statistics for cases involving partners or ex-partners (Homicide in Scotland 2025-26 see Table 8 for relationship between victim and accused). For each of these three products data is available split by male and female victims, and for the Fife council area (either through existing publications or on request). In line with the Code of Practice for Official Statistics, each publication invites feedback on people’s use of our statistics and any suggestions for improvement.
- Asked by: Stephen Kerr, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party
-
Date lodged: Friday, 09 October 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Kirsten Oswald on 29 October 2026
To ask the Scottish Government for what reasons anti-strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) legislation was not included in its Programme for Government.
Answer
The 2026-31 Programme for Government sets out the strategic direction and ambitions of the Scottish Government over the five years of this Parliamentary session. It outlines 11 ambitions the government will drive forward to eradicate child poverty, grow the economy, tackle climate change and improve public services.
The Scottish Government is committed to bringing forward reform to identify and prevent SLAPPS in this Parliamentary term.
- Asked by: Amanda Bland, MSP for Central Scot and Lothians West, Reform UK
-
Date lodged: Monday, 12 October 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Kirsten Oswald on 29 October 2026
To ask the Scottish Government what its response is to comments reportedly made by the Scottish Retail Consortium and published in The Herald on 5 October 2026 that, following a 40 per cent increase in reported thefts since April 2025, funding for Police Scotland’s Retail Crime Taskforce should be increased in the 2027-28 Budget.
Answer
A significant rise in recorded shoplifting, driven by the cost of living, is seen throughout the United Kingdom. As Police Scotland takes steps to make reporting of retail crime easier, it is likely that the number of recorded incidents in Scotland will continue to rise.
The Scottish Government's Programme for Government commits to provide £10 million over the next three years to tackle retail crime through Police Scotland’s Retail Crime Taskforce. An additional £3 million has been provided to Police Scotland in 2026-27 to support this work, which helps to target repeat offenders and to drive enforcement in the most affected areas.
The 2027-28 draft Scottish Budget will be presented to Parliament on Thursday 3 December 2026.
- Asked by: Carol Mochan, MSP for South Scotland, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Friday, 02 October 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Maree Todd on 29 October 2026
To ask the Scottish Government what support is available to families and unpaid carers of people living with alcohol-related brain damage (ARBD), and whether it considers that further provision is necessary.
Answer
Support for families and unpaid carers of people living with alcohol-related brain damage (ARBD) is available through Scotland's carers' support framework, including local carers' services, advocacy and guardianship arrangements, alcohol and drug family support services and, where available, specialist ARBD services. Families and carers also have an important role in assessment, care planning and rehabilitation.
The Scottish Government recognises the significant impact that ARBD can have on individuals, families and carers. National reviews have highlighted variation in the availability of specialist ARBD services across Scotland and identified opportunities to strengthen support pathways. The Scottish Government continues to work with health, social care and third-sector partners to improve outcomes for people affected by ARBD and those who provide care and support to them
- Asked by: Adam Harley, MSP for Strathkelvin and Bearsden, Scottish Liberal Democrats
-
Date lodged: Thursday, 01 October 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Maree Todd on 29 October 2026
To ask the Scottish Government whether every neonatal unit in Scotland has a designated member of staff responsible for regularly reviewing neonatal mortality and other relevant safety data, including identifying concerning trends and reporting these to NHS board level, and, if not, whether it will introduce such a requirement.
Answer
The Scottish Government does not hold information on whether every neonatal unit in Scotland has a designated member of staff responsible for reviewing neonatal mortality and other safety data and reporting concerns to NHS board level.
NHS boards are responsible for the governance and oversight of their neonatal services, including arrangements for monitoring mortality, reviewing adverse events and escalating patient safety concerns.
All neonatal units in Scotland contribute data to the MBRRACE-UK perinatal mortality surveillance programme, and each Board gets a bespoke report on the findings of the surveillance programme in their Board.
The Scottish Government is considering the recommendations of the Thirlwall Inquiry. Any implications for neonatal services in Scotland will be considered through the Maternity and Neonatal Taskforce.
- Asked by: Claire Baker, MSP for Mid Scotland and Fife, Scottish Labour
-
Date lodged: Friday, 02 October 2026
-
Current Status:
Answered by Hannah Mary Goodlad on 29 October 2026
To ask the Scottish Government what assessment it has made of any implications of hyperscale data centre applications already in the planning system on its forthcoming national planning guidance, and whether it expects planning authorities to determine such applications before the guidance is published.
Answer
Before making a decision on a planning application, it is for the planning authority to interpret and implement all relevant planning legislation, policies and guidance as it deems appropriate, given the circumstances in each case, and to ensure that the provisions of the planning system are applied properly.
We do not anticipate any applications will be determined by planning authorities before our planning guidance on data centres is issued later this year. Through the notification direction we issued during the summer we are actively monitoring live applications and their intended timescales for determination.