The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1306 contributions
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Jeremy Balfour
My final question to all of you is about the Scottish Government’s promised reform of the legal aid system. Particularly with regard to domestic abuse cases, what changes would you like to see in any reform?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Jeremy Balfour
Good morning, and thank you for coming. My apologies for being late—I was in another committee trying to make law, unsuccessfully.
What is your position on the criticism that section 28 allows tenants to withhold payment if the landlord fails to notify them of their UK address? That is about those who have different addresses.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Jeremy Balfour
I will leave it there, convener.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Jeremy Balfour
What is your view of the argument that the transitional provisions of the bill could lead to uncertainty? Do they need to be altered, removed or strengthened?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Jeremy Balfour
All the views are helpful. What about you, Stacey?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Jeremy Balfour
I have a final question. What is your view on the arguments made that the transitional provisions will lead to uncertainty for partners in a lease during a transition period? Do you have any views on that?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Jeremy Balfour
Can I just push you slightly on that? I am not questioning what you are saying, but are you arguing that, with lots of amendments at stages 2 and 3, the bill could be made to work, or are you saying that it is so flawed that, even with all those amendments, it would not be good law, and we should just vote it down and go away and think again? Can you clarify that for me, please?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Jeremy Balfour
Okay. That is helpful.
We have heard some criticism about section 30(3), which says that landlords should serve an irritancy notice to a tenant’s creditor. What is your position is on whether section 30(3) works for landlords and tenants?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Jeremy Balfour
I have one further question. If you covered this before I arrived, I apologise. We heard from the Faculty of Advocates last week, as you probably have, and ultimately, its view was that the bill should not proceed and that we should go back and rethink it. That was not necessarily the view of the Law Society of Scotland or those in practice. From an academic perspective, should we proceed with the bill, or are you of the view that the Government should go away and think again?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 6 May 2025
Jeremy Balfour
The Law Society has gone a step further, saying that the tenant should have to give notice to the landlord if there is a heritable security over the property. Do you agree with that position?